CIT仓位的极端变化会影响谷物期货市场的价格吗?

IF 1.6 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1017/aae.2022.40
Jiarui Li, S. Irwin, Xiaoli L. Etienne
{"title":"CIT仓位的极端变化会影响谷物期货市场的价格吗?","authors":"Jiarui Li, S. Irwin, Xiaoli L. Etienne","doi":"10.1017/aae.2022.40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Most previous studies reject the basic tenet of the Masters Hypothesis that the influx of financial index investments has pressured agricultural futures prices upwards substantially. However, the impact of index investment activities may be more complicated and nuanced than can be detected by the relatively simple linear Granger causality tests used in many previous studies. Our study applies a new cross-quantilogram (CQ) test to weekly index trader positions and returns in four agricultural futures markets. Overall, we find limited support for a significant relationship between extreme index trader position changes and returns, and even less support that increased index trading activities have pushed commodity prices higher.","PeriodicalId":14970,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics","volume":"54 1","pages":"792 - 814"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Extreme CIT Position Changes Move Prices in Grain Futures Markets?\",\"authors\":\"Jiarui Li, S. Irwin, Xiaoli L. Etienne\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/aae.2022.40\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Most previous studies reject the basic tenet of the Masters Hypothesis that the influx of financial index investments has pressured agricultural futures prices upwards substantially. However, the impact of index investment activities may be more complicated and nuanced than can be detected by the relatively simple linear Granger causality tests used in many previous studies. Our study applies a new cross-quantilogram (CQ) test to weekly index trader positions and returns in four agricultural futures markets. Overall, we find limited support for a significant relationship between extreme index trader position changes and returns, and even less support that increased index trading activities have pushed commodity prices higher.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"792 - 814\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/aae.2022.40\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/aae.2022.40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以往的大多数研究都否定了马斯特斯假设的基本原则,即金融指数投资的涌入大幅推高了农产品期货价格。然而,指数投资活动的影响可能比许多先前研究中使用的相对简单的线性格兰杰因果检验所能检测到的更为复杂和微妙。我们的研究应用了一种新的交叉量化图(CQ)检验,对四个农产品期货市场的周指数交易者头寸和回报进行了检验。总体而言,我们发现极端指数交易者头寸变化与回报之间的显著关系支持有限,指数交易活动增加推高商品价格的支持更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do Extreme CIT Position Changes Move Prices in Grain Futures Markets?
Abstract Most previous studies reject the basic tenet of the Masters Hypothesis that the influx of financial index investments has pressured agricultural futures prices upwards substantially. However, the impact of index investment activities may be more complicated and nuanced than can be detected by the relatively simple linear Granger causality tests used in many previous studies. Our study applies a new cross-quantilogram (CQ) test to weekly index trader positions and returns in four agricultural futures markets. Overall, we find limited support for a significant relationship between extreme index trader position changes and returns, and even less support that increased index trading activities have pushed commodity prices higher.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
39
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the Southern Agricultural Economics Association, the Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics is a forum for creative and scholarly work in agricultural economics and related areas. Contributions on methodology and applications in business, extension, research, and teaching phases of agricultural and applied economics are equally encouraged. As of 2015 (Vol 47), articles are published on an open access basis.
期刊最新文献
Consumer Willingness to Pay for Visually Imperfect Organic Kale Assessing Peer Influence on Farmers’ Climate Adaptations: An Experimental Adoption of Index Insurance and Savings in Uzbekistan How Do Risk Preferences Affect Golf Course Superintendents’ Adoption of Precision Irrigation Technologies? Implications from Prospect Theory – ERRATUM The Drivers of U.S. Meat Goat Prices: A Hedonic Analysis of Goat Auction Data The Alternative Livestock Revolution: Prospects for Consumer Acceptance of Plant-based and Cultured Meat in South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1