模拟微除颤器介导的眼部损伤:内窥镜鼻窦手术的一个警告。

Cameron P Worden, Carly A. Clark, A. Senior, R. Schlosser, A. Kimple, B. Senior
{"title":"模拟微除颤器介导的眼部损伤:内窥镜鼻窦手术的一个警告。","authors":"Cameron P Worden, Carly A. Clark, A. Senior, R. Schlosser, A. Kimple, B. Senior","doi":"10.4193/RHINOL/19.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nThe microdebrider has become nearly universal in the treatment of sinonasal pathology; however, recent case reports have demonstrated the potential for major ophthalmic complications. The goal of this study was twofold: 1) determine the anatomical proximity of ophthalmic structures to the paranasal sinuses, and 2) assess the timeframe at which ophthalmic injury may occur with the use of a microdebrider during FESS utilizing a cadaveric model.\n\n\nMethodology/Principal\nComputed tomography scans from 50 patients were accessed retrospectively. The distances between the lamina papyracea (LP) and orbital structures were determined at varying depths. Seven cadavers (14 sides) were studied using three microdebrider systems operated by otolaryngology residents. Following removal of a window of LP, the time from activation of the microdebrider on the periorbita until transection of the medial rectus (MR), optic nerve (ON), and to aspiration of the globe were measured.\n\n\nResults\nThe mean distance between the LP and MR at the level of the anterior aspect of the anterior ethmoid and basal lamella were 3.59 ±1.2mm and 1.5 ±0.8mm, respectively. The mean distance between the LP and ON at the level of the basal lamella was 8.1 ±2.1mm. Mean transection times for the MR and ON were 13.4 ± 7.3 seconds and 37.3 ± 9.2 seconds, respectively, with minimum times of 4 seconds and 26 seconds.\n\n\nConclusions\nThe proximity of orbital structures to the paranasal sinuses and the rapidity of ophthalmic damage following violation of the periorbita reaffirms the need for cautious use of the microdebrider during FESS.","PeriodicalId":74737,"journal":{"name":"Rhinology online","volume":"2 1","pages":"44-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling Microdebrider-Mediated Ophthalmic Damage: A Word of Caution in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Cameron P Worden, Carly A. Clark, A. Senior, R. Schlosser, A. Kimple, B. Senior\",\"doi\":\"10.4193/RHINOL/19.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background\\nThe microdebrider has become nearly universal in the treatment of sinonasal pathology; however, recent case reports have demonstrated the potential for major ophthalmic complications. The goal of this study was twofold: 1) determine the anatomical proximity of ophthalmic structures to the paranasal sinuses, and 2) assess the timeframe at which ophthalmic injury may occur with the use of a microdebrider during FESS utilizing a cadaveric model.\\n\\n\\nMethodology/Principal\\nComputed tomography scans from 50 patients were accessed retrospectively. The distances between the lamina papyracea (LP) and orbital structures were determined at varying depths. Seven cadavers (14 sides) were studied using three microdebrider systems operated by otolaryngology residents. Following removal of a window of LP, the time from activation of the microdebrider on the periorbita until transection of the medial rectus (MR), optic nerve (ON), and to aspiration of the globe were measured.\\n\\n\\nResults\\nThe mean distance between the LP and MR at the level of the anterior aspect of the anterior ethmoid and basal lamella were 3.59 ±1.2mm and 1.5 ±0.8mm, respectively. The mean distance between the LP and ON at the level of the basal lamella was 8.1 ±2.1mm. Mean transection times for the MR and ON were 13.4 ± 7.3 seconds and 37.3 ± 9.2 seconds, respectively, with minimum times of 4 seconds and 26 seconds.\\n\\n\\nConclusions\\nThe proximity of orbital structures to the paranasal sinuses and the rapidity of ophthalmic damage following violation of the periorbita reaffirms the need for cautious use of the microdebrider during FESS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rhinology online\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"44-49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rhinology online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4193/RHINOL/19.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhinology online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4193/RHINOL/19.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

背景微型ebrider在鼻腔病理学治疗中已几乎普及;然而,最近的病例报告已经证明了重大眼科并发症的可能性。这项研究的目的有两个:1)确定眼科结构与鼻窦的解剖接近程度,2)利用尸体模型评估在FESS期间使用微型接骨板可能发生眼损伤的时间。对50名患者的方法/主要计算机断层扫描进行回顾性分析。在不同的深度测定了丘疹板(LP)和眼眶结构之间的距离。7具尸体(14侧)使用耳鼻喉科住院医师操作的三个微型ebrider系统进行了研究。在移除LP窗口后,测量从眶周上的微型除颤器激活到内直肌(MR)、视神经(on)横断以及眼球抽吸的时间。结果筛前侧面和基底层水平的LP和MR之间的平均距离分别为3.59±1.2mm和1.5±0.8mm。基底层水平上LP和ON之间的平均距离为8.1±2.1mm。MR和ON的平均横切时间分别为13.4±7.3秒和37.3±9.2秒,最短横切时间为4秒和26秒。结论眼眶结构与鼻窦的接近以及侵犯眶周后眼科损伤的快速性,再次证明了在FESS期间谨慎使用微型ebrider的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modeling Microdebrider-Mediated Ophthalmic Damage: A Word of Caution in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.
Background The microdebrider has become nearly universal in the treatment of sinonasal pathology; however, recent case reports have demonstrated the potential for major ophthalmic complications. The goal of this study was twofold: 1) determine the anatomical proximity of ophthalmic structures to the paranasal sinuses, and 2) assess the timeframe at which ophthalmic injury may occur with the use of a microdebrider during FESS utilizing a cadaveric model. Methodology/Principal Computed tomography scans from 50 patients were accessed retrospectively. The distances between the lamina papyracea (LP) and orbital structures were determined at varying depths. Seven cadavers (14 sides) were studied using three microdebrider systems operated by otolaryngology residents. Following removal of a window of LP, the time from activation of the microdebrider on the periorbita until transection of the medial rectus (MR), optic nerve (ON), and to aspiration of the globe were measured. Results The mean distance between the LP and MR at the level of the anterior aspect of the anterior ethmoid and basal lamella were 3.59 ±1.2mm and 1.5 ±0.8mm, respectively. The mean distance between the LP and ON at the level of the basal lamella was 8.1 ±2.1mm. Mean transection times for the MR and ON were 13.4 ± 7.3 seconds and 37.3 ± 9.2 seconds, respectively, with minimum times of 4 seconds and 26 seconds. Conclusions The proximity of orbital structures to the paranasal sinuses and the rapidity of ophthalmic damage following violation of the periorbita reaffirms the need for cautious use of the microdebrider during FESS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 control protocol for rhinologic surgery Trends in dupilumab persistence among patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps Dupilumab as an emerging treatment for refractory allergic fungal rhinosinusitis: a case series and literature review Capturing qualitative olfactory dysfunction with PARPHAIT: the parosmia, phantosmia, and anosmia test Prevalence of smell and taste dysfunction in different clinical severity groups of COVID-19 patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1