同化高频雷达风反演对切萨皮克湾COAMPS预报的影响

IF 2 4区 地球科学 Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Atmospheric Science Letters Pub Date : 2023-05-07 DOI:10.1002/asl.1171
Brian K. Blaylock, Daniel P. Tyndall, Philip A. Muscarella, Kelsey Brunner
{"title":"同化高频雷达风反演对切萨皮克湾COAMPS预报的影响","authors":"Brian K. Blaylock,&nbsp;Daniel P. Tyndall,&nbsp;Philip A. Muscarella,&nbsp;Kelsey Brunner","doi":"10.1002/asl.1171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Wind retrievals from high-frequency radars (HFRs) provide high-density, hourly wind estimates over the ocean near the coast. These wind retrievals are a promising new source of near-surface wind estimates in coastal regions where it is difficult to deploy large networks of buoys and where scatterometers cannot observe because of land contamination. In addition to improving ocean monitoring, these wind retrievals are also useful in numerical weather prediction. The wind estimates are retrieved from the HFR Doppler spectra in conjunction with the Simulating WAves Nearshore (SWAN) model, HFR forward model, and HFR adjoint model. In this work, wind retrievals were generated from three Coastal Ocean Dynamics Applications Radar (CODAR) SeaSonde HFR sites located near the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay in August 2017 and assimilated in the Coupled Ocean/Atmosphere Mesoscale Prediction System® (COAMPS) model. The impact of the assimilated HFR wind retrievals on near-surface weather forecasts is measured with adjoint-derived forecast sensitivity observation impact (FSOI) and a comparison to forecasts from a data-denial observing system experiment (OSE). The FSOI measurement indicates the HFR winds had neutral impact on the 12-h forecast while the OSE comparison suggests a small improvement in the 10-m <i>u</i> and <i>v</i> winds at lead times up to 36 h. Compared to a similar study in the Southern California Bight, the small impact on the forecast seen in this Chesapeake Bay study could be related to there being a smaller number of wind retrievals in a smaller region during a period where the HFR wind retrievals were already similar to the background wind field. We suggest that HFR wind retrievals used for numerical weather prediction may be more beneficial when generated for long swaths of coastlines rather than small, isolated areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":50734,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Science Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/asl.1171","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of assimilating wind retrievals from high-frequency radar on COAMPS forecasts in the Chesapeake Bay\",\"authors\":\"Brian K. Blaylock,&nbsp;Daniel P. Tyndall,&nbsp;Philip A. Muscarella,&nbsp;Kelsey Brunner\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/asl.1171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Wind retrievals from high-frequency radars (HFRs) provide high-density, hourly wind estimates over the ocean near the coast. These wind retrievals are a promising new source of near-surface wind estimates in coastal regions where it is difficult to deploy large networks of buoys and where scatterometers cannot observe because of land contamination. In addition to improving ocean monitoring, these wind retrievals are also useful in numerical weather prediction. The wind estimates are retrieved from the HFR Doppler spectra in conjunction with the Simulating WAves Nearshore (SWAN) model, HFR forward model, and HFR adjoint model. In this work, wind retrievals were generated from three Coastal Ocean Dynamics Applications Radar (CODAR) SeaSonde HFR sites located near the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay in August 2017 and assimilated in the Coupled Ocean/Atmosphere Mesoscale Prediction System® (COAMPS) model. The impact of the assimilated HFR wind retrievals on near-surface weather forecasts is measured with adjoint-derived forecast sensitivity observation impact (FSOI) and a comparison to forecasts from a data-denial observing system experiment (OSE). The FSOI measurement indicates the HFR winds had neutral impact on the 12-h forecast while the OSE comparison suggests a small improvement in the 10-m <i>u</i> and <i>v</i> winds at lead times up to 36 h. Compared to a similar study in the Southern California Bight, the small impact on the forecast seen in this Chesapeake Bay study could be related to there being a smaller number of wind retrievals in a smaller region during a period where the HFR wind retrievals were already similar to the background wind field. We suggest that HFR wind retrievals used for numerical weather prediction may be more beneficial when generated for long swaths of coastlines rather than small, isolated areas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atmospheric Science Letters\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/asl.1171\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atmospheric Science Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asl.1171\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Science Letters","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asl.1171","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高频雷达(HFR)的风力反演提供了海岸附近海洋上空高密度、每小时的风力估计。在沿海地区,这些风的反演是一个很有前途的近地表风估计的新来源,因为沿海地区很难部署大型浮标网络,而且由于土地污染,散射计无法观测。除了改善海洋监测,这些风的反演在数值天气预测中也很有用。风估计值是从HFR多普勒频谱中结合模拟WAves近岸(SWAN)模型、HFR正向模型和HFR伴随模型检索的。在这项工作中,2017年8月,从切萨皮克湾河口附近的三个海岸海洋动力学应用雷达(CODAR)SeaSonde HFR站点生成了风的反演结果,并在海洋/大气中尺度耦合预测系统®(COMPS)模型中进行了同化。同化HFR风反演对近地表天气预报的影响是通过伴随衍生的预测灵敏度观测影响(FSOI)和与数据否认观测系统实验(OSE)的预测进行比较来测量的。FSOI的测量结果表明,HFR风对12小时的预测产生了中性影响,而OSE的比较表明,在36小时之前,10米u和v的风略有改善 h.与南加州湾的一项类似研究相比,切萨皮克湾研究中对预测的影响较小,可能是因为在HFR风场反演已经与背景风场相似的时期,较小区域的风场反演数量较少。我们认为,用于数值天气预测的HFR风反演在长海岸线而不是小的孤立地区生成时可能更有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of assimilating wind retrievals from high-frequency radar on COAMPS forecasts in the Chesapeake Bay

Wind retrievals from high-frequency radars (HFRs) provide high-density, hourly wind estimates over the ocean near the coast. These wind retrievals are a promising new source of near-surface wind estimates in coastal regions where it is difficult to deploy large networks of buoys and where scatterometers cannot observe because of land contamination. In addition to improving ocean monitoring, these wind retrievals are also useful in numerical weather prediction. The wind estimates are retrieved from the HFR Doppler spectra in conjunction with the Simulating WAves Nearshore (SWAN) model, HFR forward model, and HFR adjoint model. In this work, wind retrievals were generated from three Coastal Ocean Dynamics Applications Radar (CODAR) SeaSonde HFR sites located near the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay in August 2017 and assimilated in the Coupled Ocean/Atmosphere Mesoscale Prediction System® (COAMPS) model. The impact of the assimilated HFR wind retrievals on near-surface weather forecasts is measured with adjoint-derived forecast sensitivity observation impact (FSOI) and a comparison to forecasts from a data-denial observing system experiment (OSE). The FSOI measurement indicates the HFR winds had neutral impact on the 12-h forecast while the OSE comparison suggests a small improvement in the 10-m u and v winds at lead times up to 36 h. Compared to a similar study in the Southern California Bight, the small impact on the forecast seen in this Chesapeake Bay study could be related to there being a smaller number of wind retrievals in a smaller region during a period where the HFR wind retrievals were already similar to the background wind field. We suggest that HFR wind retrievals used for numerical weather prediction may be more beneficial when generated for long swaths of coastlines rather than small, isolated areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Atmospheric Science Letters
Atmospheric Science Letters METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.30%
发文量
73
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Atmospheric Science Letters (ASL) is a wholly Open Access electronic journal. Its aim is to provide a fully peer reviewed publication route for new shorter contributions in the field of atmospheric and closely related sciences. Through its ability to publish shorter contributions more rapidly than conventional journals, ASL offers a framework that promotes new understanding and creates scientific debate - providing a platform for discussing scientific issues and techniques. We encourage the presentation of multi-disciplinary work and contributions that utilise ideas and techniques from parallel areas. We particularly welcome contributions that maximise the visualisation capabilities offered by a purely on-line journal. ASL welcomes papers in the fields of: Dynamical meteorology; Ocean-atmosphere systems; Climate change, variability and impacts; New or improved observations from instrumentation; Hydrometeorology; Numerical weather prediction; Data assimilation and ensemble forecasting; Physical processes of the atmosphere; Land surface-atmosphere systems.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Change detection of the Köppen climate zones in Southeastern Europe Issue Information Are convection-permitting climate projections reliable for urban planning over Africa? A case study of Johannesburg Diurnal asymmetry of surface albedo in a semi-arid grassland over the China's Loess Plateau
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1