人工基质与天然基质是否会导致过环虫组合的差异?西地中海盆地的案例研究

IF 2.3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY Mediterranean Marine Science Pub Date : 2023-07-05 DOI:10.12681/mms.31267
Sonia DIAZ-VERGARA, E. López
{"title":"人工基质与天然基质是否会导致过环虫组合的差异?西地中海盆地的案例研究","authors":"Sonia DIAZ-VERGARA, E. López","doi":"10.12681/mms.31267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this investigation was to assess the differences in terms of α-diversity, species composition and trophic structure between peracarid assemblages inhabiting artificial hard substrates and those present on natural ones at two sites in the Western Mediterranean Sea. In each one, samples were collected from natural and artificial substrates, and the extracted peracarids were identified to the species level. Each sample was characterised by its Total Abundance, Species Richness, and 1-D Simpson, Shannon, Margalef and Equitability indices. A cluster plot based on the Bray-Curtis coefficient was conducted to detect the presence of distinct assemblages. In addition, the proportion of individuals belonging to each feeding guild was studied. The ecological indices revealed that assemblages from the artificial substrates at the Villaricos site showed lower values of diversity, while they were more diverse at the Calpe site. These results indicated that artificial hard substrates were not always inadequate ground for these animals. The species composition differed between artificial and natural hard substrates in the two studied sites and the trophic structure was also modified, although, in this case, the changes were similar in both sites. However, the difference in both respects seems to be higher between sites than between substrates, evidencing the importance of local scale processes.","PeriodicalId":51128,"journal":{"name":"Mediterranean Marine Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do artificial vs natural substrates cause a difference in assemblages of peracarids? A case study in the Western Mediterranean basin\",\"authors\":\"Sonia DIAZ-VERGARA, E. López\",\"doi\":\"10.12681/mms.31267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this investigation was to assess the differences in terms of α-diversity, species composition and trophic structure between peracarid assemblages inhabiting artificial hard substrates and those present on natural ones at two sites in the Western Mediterranean Sea. In each one, samples were collected from natural and artificial substrates, and the extracted peracarids were identified to the species level. Each sample was characterised by its Total Abundance, Species Richness, and 1-D Simpson, Shannon, Margalef and Equitability indices. A cluster plot based on the Bray-Curtis coefficient was conducted to detect the presence of distinct assemblages. In addition, the proportion of individuals belonging to each feeding guild was studied. The ecological indices revealed that assemblages from the artificial substrates at the Villaricos site showed lower values of diversity, while they were more diverse at the Calpe site. These results indicated that artificial hard substrates were not always inadequate ground for these animals. The species composition differed between artificial and natural hard substrates in the two studied sites and the trophic structure was also modified, although, in this case, the changes were similar in both sites. However, the difference in both respects seems to be higher between sites than between substrates, evidencing the importance of local scale processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mediterranean Marine Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mediterranean Marine Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12681/mms.31267\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediterranean Marine Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12681/mms.31267","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估西地中海两个地点栖息在人工硬底质上的peracarid组合与自然硬底质中的peracalid组合在α多样性、物种组成和营养结构方面的差异。在每一种情况下,都从天然和人工基质中采集样本,并对提取的过壳进行物种鉴定。每个样本都以其总丰度、物种丰富度和1-D Simpson、Shannon、Margalef和Equitable指数为特征。基于Bray-Curtis系数进行聚类图,以检测不同组合的存在。此外,还研究了每个饲养公会的个体比例。生态指数显示,维拉里科斯遗址人工基质的组合显示出较低的多样性值,而卡尔佩遗址的组合则更具多样性。这些结果表明,人工硬质基质并不总是不适合这些动物。在两个研究地点,人工和天然硬基质的物种组成不同,营养结构也发生了变化,尽管在这种情况下,两个地点的变化相似。然而,位点之间的差异似乎比底物之间的差异更大,这证明了局部规模工艺的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do artificial vs natural substrates cause a difference in assemblages of peracarids? A case study in the Western Mediterranean basin
The aim of this investigation was to assess the differences in terms of α-diversity, species composition and trophic structure between peracarid assemblages inhabiting artificial hard substrates and those present on natural ones at two sites in the Western Mediterranean Sea. In each one, samples were collected from natural and artificial substrates, and the extracted peracarids were identified to the species level. Each sample was characterised by its Total Abundance, Species Richness, and 1-D Simpson, Shannon, Margalef and Equitability indices. A cluster plot based on the Bray-Curtis coefficient was conducted to detect the presence of distinct assemblages. In addition, the proportion of individuals belonging to each feeding guild was studied. The ecological indices revealed that assemblages from the artificial substrates at the Villaricos site showed lower values of diversity, while they were more diverse at the Calpe site. These results indicated that artificial hard substrates were not always inadequate ground for these animals. The species composition differed between artificial and natural hard substrates in the two studied sites and the trophic structure was also modified, although, in this case, the changes were similar in both sites. However, the difference in both respects seems to be higher between sites than between substrates, evidencing the importance of local scale processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mediterranean Marine Science
Mediterranean Marine Science MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
17.90%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Mediterranean Marine Science (MMS), published by the Hellenic Centre for Marine Research (HCMR), issues three volumes annually. The journal welcomes original research articles, short communications, New Mediterranean Biodiversity records, extended reviews, comments, and Theme sections in all fields of Oceanography, Marine Biology, Marine Conservation, Fisheries and Aquaculture in the Mediterranean area and the adjacent regions. All content is peer reviewed.
期刊最新文献
Status, distribution, and threats of the last surviving fan mussel populations in Greece First genetic survey on the invasive rayed pearl oyster Pinctada radiata (Leach, 1814) populations of the Balearic Islands (Western Mediterranean) Quick spreading of the exotic amphipod Laticorophium baconi (Shoemaker, 1934): another small stowaway overlooked? New records of introduced species in the Mediterranean Sea (November 2023) Halimeda incrassata (Bryopsidales, Chlorophyta) in Rhodes, Greece, Eastern Mediterranean
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1