胰岛素敏感性/胰岛素抵抗作为慢性丙型肝炎后食管静脉曲张的预测指标

R. Badawi, M. Watany, Hala Moustafa Elsabagh, W. ElKhalawany
{"title":"胰岛素敏感性/胰岛素抵抗作为慢性丙型肝炎后食管静脉曲张的预测指标","authors":"R. Badawi, M. Watany, Hala Moustafa Elsabagh, W. ElKhalawany","doi":"10.2174/18753183-v12-e2204040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Screening of Esophageal Varices (EV) in liver cirrhosis is highly recommended in all consensus reports. The standard screening procedure is endoscopy. Insulin resistance (IR) and the quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) are reliable predictors of portal hypertension.\n \n \n \n The study aimed to assess and compare the validity of insulin sensitivity/insulin resistance markers and other non-invasive markers for the detection of EVs in post chronic hepatitis C virus cirrhotic patients.\n \n \n \n In this cross-sectional study, 76 patients were screened by esophagogastroduodenoscopy and abdominal ultrasonography. Estimation of fasting serum insulin by ELISA technique was carried out. Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and QUICKI was performed.\n \n \n \n The patients with an advanced grade of EV had higher insulin resistance and lower QUICKI. A cut-off value of HOMA-IR ≥ 3.4 could significantly predict EVs with 72% sensitivity and 80.0% specificity. Spleen diameter and platelet count/spleen diameter ratio (PC/SD) showed a significant difference among groups.\n \n \n \n Lower insulin sensitivity (assessed by QUICKI) and higher insulin resistance (assessed by HOMA IR) were good non-invasive predictors of EVs. In addition, portal vein (PV) diameter, spleen diameter, and PC/SD were also found as predictors of EVs.\n","PeriodicalId":39398,"journal":{"name":"Open Biomarkers Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insulin Sensitivity / Insulin Resistance as Predictors of Esophageal Varices in Post Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Patients\",\"authors\":\"R. Badawi, M. Watany, Hala Moustafa Elsabagh, W. ElKhalawany\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/18753183-v12-e2204040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Screening of Esophageal Varices (EV) in liver cirrhosis is highly recommended in all consensus reports. The standard screening procedure is endoscopy. Insulin resistance (IR) and the quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) are reliable predictors of portal hypertension.\\n \\n \\n \\n The study aimed to assess and compare the validity of insulin sensitivity/insulin resistance markers and other non-invasive markers for the detection of EVs in post chronic hepatitis C virus cirrhotic patients.\\n \\n \\n \\n In this cross-sectional study, 76 patients were screened by esophagogastroduodenoscopy and abdominal ultrasonography. Estimation of fasting serum insulin by ELISA technique was carried out. Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and QUICKI was performed.\\n \\n \\n \\n The patients with an advanced grade of EV had higher insulin resistance and lower QUICKI. A cut-off value of HOMA-IR ≥ 3.4 could significantly predict EVs with 72% sensitivity and 80.0% specificity. Spleen diameter and platelet count/spleen diameter ratio (PC/SD) showed a significant difference among groups.\\n \\n \\n \\n Lower insulin sensitivity (assessed by QUICKI) and higher insulin resistance (assessed by HOMA IR) were good non-invasive predictors of EVs. In addition, portal vein (PV) diameter, spleen diameter, and PC/SD were also found as predictors of EVs.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":39398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Biomarkers Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Biomarkers Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/18753183-v12-e2204040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Biomarkers Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/18753183-v12-e2204040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

所有共识报告都强烈建议筛查肝硬化患者的食管静脉曲张(EV)。标准的筛查程序是内窥镜检查。胰岛素抵抗(IR)和定量胰岛素敏感性检查指数(QUICKI)是门静脉高压的可靠预测指标。该研究旨在评估和比较胰岛素敏感性/胰岛素抵抗标志物和其他非侵入性标志物在慢性丙型肝炎病毒后肝硬化患者中检测EVs的有效性。在这项横断面研究中,76名患者接受了食管胃十二指肠镜和腹部超声检查。采用ELISA法测定空腹血清胰岛素。进行胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)和QUICKI。EV晚期患者胰岛素抵抗较高,QUICKI较低。HOMA-IR的临界值≥3.4可显著预测EVs,敏感性为72%,特异性为80.0%。脾脏直径和血小板计数/脾脏直径比(PC/SD)在各组之间有显著差异。较低的胰岛素敏感性(通过QUICKI评估)和较高的胰岛素抵抗(通过HOMA IR评估)是EVs的良好非侵入性预测因素。此外,门静脉(PV)直径、脾脏直径和PC/SD也被发现是EVs的预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Insulin Sensitivity / Insulin Resistance as Predictors of Esophageal Varices in Post Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Patients
Screening of Esophageal Varices (EV) in liver cirrhosis is highly recommended in all consensus reports. The standard screening procedure is endoscopy. Insulin resistance (IR) and the quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) are reliable predictors of portal hypertension. The study aimed to assess and compare the validity of insulin sensitivity/insulin resistance markers and other non-invasive markers for the detection of EVs in post chronic hepatitis C virus cirrhotic patients. In this cross-sectional study, 76 patients were screened by esophagogastroduodenoscopy and abdominal ultrasonography. Estimation of fasting serum insulin by ELISA technique was carried out. Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and QUICKI was performed. The patients with an advanced grade of EV had higher insulin resistance and lower QUICKI. A cut-off value of HOMA-IR ≥ 3.4 could significantly predict EVs with 72% sensitivity and 80.0% specificity. Spleen diameter and platelet count/spleen diameter ratio (PC/SD) showed a significant difference among groups. Lower insulin sensitivity (assessed by QUICKI) and higher insulin resistance (assessed by HOMA IR) were good non-invasive predictors of EVs. In addition, portal vein (PV) diameter, spleen diameter, and PC/SD were also found as predictors of EVs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Biomarkers Journal
Open Biomarkers Journal Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The Open Biomarkers Journal is an Open Access online journal, which publishes original full-length, short research articles and reviews on biomarkers in clinical, medical and pharmaceutical research. The coverage includes biomarkers of disease, new biomarkers, exposure to drugs, genetic effects, and applications of biomarkers. The Open Biomarkers Journal, a peer reviewed journal, aims to provide the most complete and reliable source of information on current developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality articles rapidly and freely available to researchers worldwide.
期刊最新文献
The Cytoglobin Expression Under Hypoxic Conditions in Covid-19 Cases microRNA-146a: A biomarker for Epileptogenesis, Epilepsy Prognosis, and Treatment Resistance Study of Gender-based Changes in P53 in Preeclampsia A Mini-review on the Effects of (Carbon) Nanoparticles and Oxidative Stress in Animals Diagnostic Accuracy of Red Cell Distribution Width to Platelet Ratio for Detection of Liver Fibrosis Compared with Fibroscan in Chronic Hepatitis B Egyptian patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1