实际汇率与中国制造业

Ping Hua
{"title":"实际汇率与中国制造业","authors":"Ping Hua","doi":"10.13189/aeb.2020.080401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Chinese real manufacturing value added increased at a higher growth rate (17% per year on average) during the strong depreciation period of the renminbi from 1984 to 1993 than that (10%) during the period of the strong appreciation from 1994 to 2016. On contrary, its productivity growth accelerated at an annual average rate of 9.7% during the real appreciation period relative to 3.6% during the real depreciation period. This paper originally argues that real appreciation of exchange rate may improve manufacturing productivity (rarely studied), mitigating its traditional negative effects; its total effect is thus uncertain; only an empirical investigation can reveal it. We propose a manufacturing value added function augmented of real exchange rate able to estimate these two kinds of effects. To this objective, we calculate three renminbi real exchange rates for the Chinese manufacturing at macro, product and sector levels. The obtained results confirm that the renminbi real appreciation exerted traditional negative effects on the size of tradable sector and employment, but positive effects on capital intensity, efficiency improvement of workers and staffs and competitiveness via Schumpeterian “creative destruction,” innovation and high technology industries. The positive effects on manufacturing value added are however still too small to offset the negative ones. These results suggest that China should gradually revalue the renminbi in function of manufacturing productivity improvement to avoid the serious deceleration of manufacturing industry when its negative impacts on the size of tradable sector, resource allocation to non-tradable sector and employment are superior to positive effects of productivity improvement.","PeriodicalId":91438,"journal":{"name":"Advances in economics and business","volume":"8 1","pages":"193-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real Exchange Rates and Manufacturing Industry in China\",\"authors\":\"Ping Hua\",\"doi\":\"10.13189/aeb.2020.080401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Chinese real manufacturing value added increased at a higher growth rate (17% per year on average) during the strong depreciation period of the renminbi from 1984 to 1993 than that (10%) during the period of the strong appreciation from 1994 to 2016. On contrary, its productivity growth accelerated at an annual average rate of 9.7% during the real appreciation period relative to 3.6% during the real depreciation period. This paper originally argues that real appreciation of exchange rate may improve manufacturing productivity (rarely studied), mitigating its traditional negative effects; its total effect is thus uncertain; only an empirical investigation can reveal it. We propose a manufacturing value added function augmented of real exchange rate able to estimate these two kinds of effects. To this objective, we calculate three renminbi real exchange rates for the Chinese manufacturing at macro, product and sector levels. The obtained results confirm that the renminbi real appreciation exerted traditional negative effects on the size of tradable sector and employment, but positive effects on capital intensity, efficiency improvement of workers and staffs and competitiveness via Schumpeterian “creative destruction,” innovation and high technology industries. The positive effects on manufacturing value added are however still too small to offset the negative ones. These results suggest that China should gradually revalue the renminbi in function of manufacturing productivity improvement to avoid the serious deceleration of manufacturing industry when its negative impacts on the size of tradable sector, resource allocation to non-tradable sector and employment are superior to positive effects of productivity improvement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in economics and business\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"193-204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in economics and business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13189/aeb.2020.080401\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in economics and business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13189/aeb.2020.080401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1984 - 1993年人民币强贬值期间,中国实际制造业增加值的年均增长率(17%)高于1994 - 2016年人民币强升值期间的年均增长率(10%)。相反,在实际升值期间,其生产率的年平均增长率为9.7%,而在实际贬值期间为3.6%。本文最初认为,汇率的实际升值可能提高制造业生产率(很少研究),减轻其传统的负面影响;因此,它的总体效果是不确定的;只有实证调查才能揭示这一点。我们提出了一个实际汇率增广的制造业增加值函数来估计这两种效应。为此,我们从宏观、产品和行业三个层面计算了中国制造业的人民币实际汇率。所得结果证实,人民币实际升值对贸易部门规模和就业产生了传统的负面影响,但对资本密集度、工人和员工效率的提高以及通过熊彼特“创造性破坏”、创新和高技术产业的竞争力产生了积极影响。然而,对制造业增加值的正面影响仍然太小,不足以抵消负面影响。这些结果表明,当人民币对贸易部门规模、对非贸易部门资源配置和就业的负面影响大于生产率提升的正面影响时,中国应逐步对人民币的制造业生产率提升功能进行升值,以避免制造业严重减速。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Real Exchange Rates and Manufacturing Industry in China
The Chinese real manufacturing value added increased at a higher growth rate (17% per year on average) during the strong depreciation period of the renminbi from 1984 to 1993 than that (10%) during the period of the strong appreciation from 1994 to 2016. On contrary, its productivity growth accelerated at an annual average rate of 9.7% during the real appreciation period relative to 3.6% during the real depreciation period. This paper originally argues that real appreciation of exchange rate may improve manufacturing productivity (rarely studied), mitigating its traditional negative effects; its total effect is thus uncertain; only an empirical investigation can reveal it. We propose a manufacturing value added function augmented of real exchange rate able to estimate these two kinds of effects. To this objective, we calculate three renminbi real exchange rates for the Chinese manufacturing at macro, product and sector levels. The obtained results confirm that the renminbi real appreciation exerted traditional negative effects on the size of tradable sector and employment, but positive effects on capital intensity, efficiency improvement of workers and staffs and competitiveness via Schumpeterian “creative destruction,” innovation and high technology industries. The positive effects on manufacturing value added are however still too small to offset the negative ones. These results suggest that China should gradually revalue the renminbi in function of manufacturing productivity improvement to avoid the serious deceleration of manufacturing industry when its negative impacts on the size of tradable sector, resource allocation to non-tradable sector and employment are superior to positive effects of productivity improvement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Estimation of Individual Claims Reserves Using K Modes Cluster and Reserving by Detailed Conditioning Research on the Impact of an Immature Market on the Entrepreneurial Orientation and Success of SMEs from the Private Health Sector in the Republic of North Macedonia Exploring Informal Cross-Border Trade and Its Impact on Security Challenges in Nigeria: A Case Study of the Nigeria-Benin Border A New Framework for Fujian's "Double Carbon" Strategy Based on Digital Finance Theory A Study on Pandemic COVID-19 on Indonesia's Consumer Preferences: Input for Business and Government Policies in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1