桡骨远端骨折ORIF术后的康复轨迹

Pub Date : 2023-07-13 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1771045
Gabriel Larose, Darren M Roffey, Henry M Broekhuyse, Pierre Guy, Peter O'Brien, Kelly A Lefaivre
{"title":"桡骨远端骨折ORIF术后的康复轨迹","authors":"Gabriel Larose, Darren M Roffey, Henry M Broekhuyse, Pierre Guy, Peter O'Brien, Kelly A Lefaivre","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1771045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>  Distal radius fractures are commonly seen among the elderly, though studies examining their long-term outcomes are limited. <b>Purpose</b>  The aim of this study was to describe the 5-year trajectory of recovery of distal radius fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). <b>Methods</b>  Patients with distal radius fractures (AO/OTA 23.A-C) treated by ORIF were prospectively studied. Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score was measured at baseline (preinjury recall) and postoperatively at 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years. Clinically relevant change in PRWE score was assessed using the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). <b>Results</b>  A total of 390 patients were included, of which 75% completed 5-year follow-up. Mean baseline PRWE score was 1.25 (standard deviation, SD: 2.9). At 6 months, mean PRWE score was at its highest up to 20.2 (SD: 18.4; <i>p</i>  < 0.01). A significant improvement in mean PRWE score was observed at 1 year down to 15.2 (SD: 17.6; <i>p</i>  < 0.01); 44% of patients were still one MCID outside of their baseline PRWE score at 1 year. Further significant improvement in mean PRWE score occurred at 5 years down to 9.4 (SD: 13.4; <i>p</i>  < 0.01); 29% of patients remained one MCID outside of their baseline PRWE score at 5 years. <b>Conclusion</b>  Recovery after ORIF for distal radius fractures showed significant worsening after surgery, followed by significant improvements up to 1 year and between years 1 and 5, albeit to a lesser extent. Statistically and clinically relevant wrist pain and disability persisted at 5 years. Future research should examine different treatment modalities and include a nonoperative treatment arm for comparison. <b>Level of Evidence</b>  Prognostic level II.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11129881/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trajectory of Recovery following ORIF for Distal Radius Fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Larose, Darren M Roffey, Henry M Broekhuyse, Pierre Guy, Peter O'Brien, Kelly A Lefaivre\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1771045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>  Distal radius fractures are commonly seen among the elderly, though studies examining their long-term outcomes are limited. <b>Purpose</b>  The aim of this study was to describe the 5-year trajectory of recovery of distal radius fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). <b>Methods</b>  Patients with distal radius fractures (AO/OTA 23.A-C) treated by ORIF were prospectively studied. Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score was measured at baseline (preinjury recall) and postoperatively at 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years. Clinically relevant change in PRWE score was assessed using the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). <b>Results</b>  A total of 390 patients were included, of which 75% completed 5-year follow-up. Mean baseline PRWE score was 1.25 (standard deviation, SD: 2.9). At 6 months, mean PRWE score was at its highest up to 20.2 (SD: 18.4; <i>p</i>  < 0.01). A significant improvement in mean PRWE score was observed at 1 year down to 15.2 (SD: 17.6; <i>p</i>  < 0.01); 44% of patients were still one MCID outside of their baseline PRWE score at 1 year. Further significant improvement in mean PRWE score occurred at 5 years down to 9.4 (SD: 13.4; <i>p</i>  < 0.01); 29% of patients remained one MCID outside of their baseline PRWE score at 5 years. <b>Conclusion</b>  Recovery after ORIF for distal radius fractures showed significant worsening after surgery, followed by significant improvements up to 1 year and between years 1 and 5, albeit to a lesser extent. Statistically and clinically relevant wrist pain and disability persisted at 5 years. Future research should examine different treatment modalities and include a nonoperative treatment arm for comparison. <b>Level of Evidence</b>  Prognostic level II.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11129881/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要背景 桡骨远端骨折在老年人中常见,尽管对其长期结果的研究有限。意图 本研究的目的是描述桡骨远端骨折采用切开复位内固定术(ORIF)治疗的5年恢复轨迹。方法 对接受ORIF治疗的桡骨远端骨折(AO/OTA 23.A-C)患者进行前瞻性研究。在基线(损伤前回忆)和术后6个月、1年和5年测量患者评分腕关节评估(PRWE)评分。使用最小临床重要差异(MCID)评估PRWE评分的临床相关变化。后果 共纳入390名患者,其中75%完成了5年随访。平均基线PRWE评分为1.25(标准差,SD:2.9)。6个月时,平均PRWE得分最高,达到20.2(SD:18.4;p < 0.01)。1年时观察到平均PRWE评分显著改善,降至15.2(SD:17.6;p < 0.01);44%的患者在1年时仍有一个MCID超出其基线PRWE评分。平均PRWE评分在5年后进一步显著改善,降至9.4(SD:13.4;p < 0.01);29%的患者在5年时仍有一个MCID超出其基线PRWE评分。结论 桡骨远端骨折ORIF后的恢复情况在手术后明显恶化,随后在1年内和1至5年之间有显著改善,尽管程度较小。统计和临床相关的手腕疼痛和残疾持续了5年。未来的研究应该检查不同的治疗方式,并包括非手术治疗组进行比较。证据级别 预后等级II。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Trajectory of Recovery following ORIF for Distal Radius Fractures.

Background  Distal radius fractures are commonly seen among the elderly, though studies examining their long-term outcomes are limited. Purpose  The aim of this study was to describe the 5-year trajectory of recovery of distal radius fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Methods  Patients with distal radius fractures (AO/OTA 23.A-C) treated by ORIF were prospectively studied. Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score was measured at baseline (preinjury recall) and postoperatively at 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years. Clinically relevant change in PRWE score was assessed using the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Results  A total of 390 patients were included, of which 75% completed 5-year follow-up. Mean baseline PRWE score was 1.25 (standard deviation, SD: 2.9). At 6 months, mean PRWE score was at its highest up to 20.2 (SD: 18.4; p  < 0.01). A significant improvement in mean PRWE score was observed at 1 year down to 15.2 (SD: 17.6; p  < 0.01); 44% of patients were still one MCID outside of their baseline PRWE score at 1 year. Further significant improvement in mean PRWE score occurred at 5 years down to 9.4 (SD: 13.4; p  < 0.01); 29% of patients remained one MCID outside of their baseline PRWE score at 5 years. Conclusion  Recovery after ORIF for distal radius fractures showed significant worsening after surgery, followed by significant improvements up to 1 year and between years 1 and 5, albeit to a lesser extent. Statistically and clinically relevant wrist pain and disability persisted at 5 years. Future research should examine different treatment modalities and include a nonoperative treatment arm for comparison. Level of Evidence  Prognostic level II.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1