反向拉动:供应链决策中供需不确定性的联合考虑

IF 11.2 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of Business Logistics Pub Date : 2022-07-18 DOI:10.1111/jbl.12315
Elliot Bendoly, Ken Boyer, Nate Craig, Somak Paul
{"title":"反向拉动:供应链决策中供需不确定性的联合考虑","authors":"Elliot Bendoly,&nbsp;Ken Boyer,&nbsp;Nate Craig,&nbsp;Somak Paul","doi":"10.1111/jbl.12315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Supply chain inventory management decisions are complicated by the presence of both downstream (demand) and upstream (supply) uncertainties. Prior research shows that each type of uncertainty leads to specific decision biases. Demand uncertainty induces a <i>pull-to-center bias</i>, wherein orders are drawn away from the optimal ordering decision in the direction of expected demand. Supply uncertainty elicits a <i>diversification bias</i>, wherein inventory managers tend to source from multiple suppliers, even when sole sourcing is optimal. Our research employs a controlled laboratory experiment to study these biases when both types of uncertainty—that is, supply and demand uncertainty—are present. Our results show that the presence of both supply and demand uncertainty has a more nuanced effect on decision biases than does either type of uncertainty alone. Demand uncertainty can elicit and influence the diversification bias, even in the absence of supply uncertainty. Moreover, supply uncertainty affects the magnitude of the pull-to-center bias. Our work reveals the need for further attention from supply chain academics and managers on how supply and demand uncertainty jointly affect inventory managers’ decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Logistics","volume":"43 4","pages":"448-471"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jbl.12315","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pulled in opposite directions: A joint consideration of supply and demand uncertainty in supply chain decision-making\",\"authors\":\"Elliot Bendoly,&nbsp;Ken Boyer,&nbsp;Nate Craig,&nbsp;Somak Paul\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jbl.12315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Supply chain inventory management decisions are complicated by the presence of both downstream (demand) and upstream (supply) uncertainties. Prior research shows that each type of uncertainty leads to specific decision biases. Demand uncertainty induces a <i>pull-to-center bias</i>, wherein orders are drawn away from the optimal ordering decision in the direction of expected demand. Supply uncertainty elicits a <i>diversification bias</i>, wherein inventory managers tend to source from multiple suppliers, even when sole sourcing is optimal. Our research employs a controlled laboratory experiment to study these biases when both types of uncertainty—that is, supply and demand uncertainty—are present. Our results show that the presence of both supply and demand uncertainty has a more nuanced effect on decision biases than does either type of uncertainty alone. Demand uncertainty can elicit and influence the diversification bias, even in the absence of supply uncertainty. Moreover, supply uncertainty affects the magnitude of the pull-to-center bias. Our work reveals the need for further attention from supply chain academics and managers on how supply and demand uncertainty jointly affect inventory managers’ decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Logistics\",\"volume\":\"43 4\",\"pages\":\"448-471\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jbl.12315\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Logistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbl.12315\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Logistics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbl.12315","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

由于下游(需求)和上游(供应)的不确定性,供应链库存管理决策变得复杂。先前的研究表明,每种不确定性都会导致特定的决策偏差。需求的不确定性导致了一种拉向中心偏差,在这种偏差中,订单会偏离预期需求方向的最优订购决策。供应的不确定性导致了多样化偏差,库存管理人员倾向于从多个供应商处采购,即使单一采购是最优的。我们的研究采用受控的实验室实验来研究两种不确定性(即供应和需求的不确定性)同时存在时的这些偏差。我们的研究结果表明,供给和需求不确定性的存在对决策偏差的影响比单独的任何一种不确定性都更微妙。即使在没有供应不确定性的情况下,需求不确定性也会引起并影响多元化倾向。此外,供应的不确定性影响拉向中心偏差的大小。我们的研究表明,供应链学者和管理者需要进一步关注供需不确定性如何共同影响库存管理者的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pulled in opposite directions: A joint consideration of supply and demand uncertainty in supply chain decision-making

Supply chain inventory management decisions are complicated by the presence of both downstream (demand) and upstream (supply) uncertainties. Prior research shows that each type of uncertainty leads to specific decision biases. Demand uncertainty induces a pull-to-center bias, wherein orders are drawn away from the optimal ordering decision in the direction of expected demand. Supply uncertainty elicits a diversification bias, wherein inventory managers tend to source from multiple suppliers, even when sole sourcing is optimal. Our research employs a controlled laboratory experiment to study these biases when both types of uncertainty—that is, supply and demand uncertainty—are present. Our results show that the presence of both supply and demand uncertainty has a more nuanced effect on decision biases than does either type of uncertainty alone. Demand uncertainty can elicit and influence the diversification bias, even in the absence of supply uncertainty. Moreover, supply uncertainty affects the magnitude of the pull-to-center bias. Our work reveals the need for further attention from supply chain academics and managers on how supply and demand uncertainty jointly affect inventory managers’ decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Supply chain management and logistics processes play a crucial role in the success of businesses, both in terms of operations, strategy, and finances. To gain a deep understanding of these processes, it is essential to explore academic literature such as The Journal of Business Logistics. This journal serves as a scholarly platform for sharing original ideas, research findings, and effective strategies in the field of logistics and supply chain management. By providing innovative insights and research-driven knowledge, it equips organizations with the necessary tools to navigate the ever-changing business environment.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Product Packaging Characteristics on Order Picking Performance in Grocery Retailing Issue Information Consumer-Centric Supply Chain Management: A Literature Review, Framework, and Research Agenda Supply Chain Plasticity: A Responsive Network Capability to Ensure Resilience Last-Mile Delivery: A Process View, Framework, and Research Agenda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1