为罕见病患者提供孤儿药物和服务:已经做了什么?系统的范围审查

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs Pub Date : 2022-11-29 DOI:10.1080/21678707.2022.2153671
H. Ghiasvand, M. Barnish, Tayebeh Moradi, E. Nikram, S. Naghdi
{"title":"为罕见病患者提供孤儿药物和服务:已经做了什么?系统的范围审查","authors":"H. Ghiasvand, M. Barnish, Tayebeh Moradi, E. Nikram, S. Naghdi","doi":"10.1080/21678707.2022.2153671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objectives Rare diseases are recognized as non-prevalent health disorders. Availability, accessibility, and affordability of Orphan Drugs (ODs), alongside genetic testing, are the major contributors to ensuring no patient is excluded by the health system. Therefore, making ODs available and accessible has been a challenge even for high-income nations. This review aims to summarize the evidence on the availability and accessibility of orphan drugs and other required resources for managing rare diseases. Methods The Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review method was used as the analytical framework. We searched Medline, and Embase through Ovid, and Web of Science. We used Guilford et al. definition and classification of accessibility and its dimensions to synthesize the evidence. Results The majority of the final included evidence is about the financial, and then availability and physical accessibility to ODs. Furthermore, almost all the evidence comes from high-income countries. Conclusion The principal hurdles to the availability and accessibility of ODs and other related services are very high prices, lack of a legal framework, and budgetary impact on public funding. A lack of reimbursement mechanisms and lower availability of other resources are among other problems.","PeriodicalId":12118,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs","volume":"10 1","pages":"55 - 64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making orphan drugs and services available and accessible for people who live with rare diseases: what has been done? a systematic scoping review\",\"authors\":\"H. Ghiasvand, M. Barnish, Tayebeh Moradi, E. Nikram, S. Naghdi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21678707.2022.2153671\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Objectives Rare diseases are recognized as non-prevalent health disorders. Availability, accessibility, and affordability of Orphan Drugs (ODs), alongside genetic testing, are the major contributors to ensuring no patient is excluded by the health system. Therefore, making ODs available and accessible has been a challenge even for high-income nations. This review aims to summarize the evidence on the availability and accessibility of orphan drugs and other required resources for managing rare diseases. Methods The Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review method was used as the analytical framework. We searched Medline, and Embase through Ovid, and Web of Science. We used Guilford et al. definition and classification of accessibility and its dimensions to synthesize the evidence. Results The majority of the final included evidence is about the financial, and then availability and physical accessibility to ODs. Furthermore, almost all the evidence comes from high-income countries. Conclusion The principal hurdles to the availability and accessibility of ODs and other related services are very high prices, lack of a legal framework, and budgetary impact on public funding. A lack of reimbursement mechanisms and lower availability of other resources are among other problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"55 - 64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21678707.2022.2153671\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21678707.2022.2153671","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的罕见病是公认的非流行健康疾病。孤儿药的可得性、可及性和可负担性,以及基因检测,是确保没有患者被卫生系统排除在外的主要因素。因此,即使是对高收入国家来说,使otc可获得和可获得也是一项挑战。这篇综述旨在总结关于孤儿药的可得性和可及性的证据以及管理罕见病所需的其他资源。方法采用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的范围审查法作为分析框架。我们搜索了Medline,通过Ovid和Web of Science搜索了Embase。我们使用Guilford等人对可达性及其维度的定义和分类来综合证据。结果最终纳入的证据主要是关于药品的财务状况,其次是药品的可得性和物质可及性。此外,几乎所有证据都来自高收入国家。ODs和其他相关服务的可用性和可及性的主要障碍是价格过高、缺乏法律框架以及对公共资金的预算影响。其他问题包括缺乏偿还机制和其他资源较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Making orphan drugs and services available and accessible for people who live with rare diseases: what has been done? a systematic scoping review
ABSTRACT Objectives Rare diseases are recognized as non-prevalent health disorders. Availability, accessibility, and affordability of Orphan Drugs (ODs), alongside genetic testing, are the major contributors to ensuring no patient is excluded by the health system. Therefore, making ODs available and accessible has been a challenge even for high-income nations. This review aims to summarize the evidence on the availability and accessibility of orphan drugs and other required resources for managing rare diseases. Methods The Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review method was used as the analytical framework. We searched Medline, and Embase through Ovid, and Web of Science. We used Guilford et al. definition and classification of accessibility and its dimensions to synthesize the evidence. Results The majority of the final included evidence is about the financial, and then availability and physical accessibility to ODs. Furthermore, almost all the evidence comes from high-income countries. Conclusion The principal hurdles to the availability and accessibility of ODs and other related services are very high prices, lack of a legal framework, and budgetary impact on public funding. A lack of reimbursement mechanisms and lower availability of other resources are among other problems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs
Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs is an international, peer-reviewed journal that covers all aspects of R&D on rare diseases and orphan drugs.
期刊最新文献
Emerging therapies against Naegleria fowleri Current and emerging therapies for the treatment of leishmaniasis The Orphan Drug Act and rare cancers: a retrospective analysis of oncologic orphan drug designations and associated approvals from 1983-2022 Orphan drugs approved in Canada: health technology assessment, price negotiation, and government formulary listing Overview of genetic testing in Prader-willi syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1