作为认知结构的古物种:“弗洛勒斯人”的模因

Q2 Social Sciences Anthropological Review Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.2478/anre-2021-0023
R. Eckhardt, M. Henneberg
{"title":"作为认知结构的古物种:“弗洛勒斯人”的模因","authors":"R. Eckhardt, M. Henneberg","doi":"10.2478/anre-2021-0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Creation and subsequent abandonment of a number of earlier species considered human ancestors: Eoanthropus dawsoni, Hesperopithecus haroldcooki, Homo gardarensis and Ramapithecus punjabicus is presented using cases from the history of science. This review indicates that the fossil evidence for these species has been questionable from the beginning but that mental images – memes – they invoked were attractive to students of human evolution and as such persisted even if not confirmed by further finds, with new research still being disputed. Against this background the status of the recent construction of the hominin species “Homo floresiensis” is discussed showing that despite dubious interpretations of the objective data and a relatively long time of non-confirmation due to paucity of newly discovered skeletal remains, the “species” still exists in minds of scholars and in the scientific literature extending into textbooks.","PeriodicalId":39218,"journal":{"name":"Anthropological Review","volume":"84 1","pages":"317 - 336"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paleospecies as cognitive construct: The meme of “Homo floresiensis”\",\"authors\":\"R. Eckhardt, M. Henneberg\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/anre-2021-0023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Creation and subsequent abandonment of a number of earlier species considered human ancestors: Eoanthropus dawsoni, Hesperopithecus haroldcooki, Homo gardarensis and Ramapithecus punjabicus is presented using cases from the history of science. This review indicates that the fossil evidence for these species has been questionable from the beginning but that mental images – memes – they invoked were attractive to students of human evolution and as such persisted even if not confirmed by further finds, with new research still being disputed. Against this background the status of the recent construction of the hominin species “Homo floresiensis” is discussed showing that despite dubious interpretations of the objective data and a relatively long time of non-confirmation due to paucity of newly discovered skeletal remains, the “species” still exists in minds of scholars and in the scientific literature extending into textbooks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropological Review\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"317 - 336\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropological Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2021-0023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropological Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2021-0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要利用科学史上的案例介绍了一些被认为是人类祖先的早期物种的创造和随后的遗弃:dawsoni始人、haroldcooki Hesperophecus、gardarensis人和punjabicus Ramapithecus。这篇综述表明,这些物种的化石证据从一开始就值得怀疑,但他们所引用的心理图像——模因——对人类进化的学生很有吸引力,因此即使没有得到进一步的发现的证实,这种图像仍然存在,新的研究仍存在争议。在这种背景下,对人类物种“弗洛雷斯人”的最新构建状况进行了讨论,表明尽管对客观数据的解释令人怀疑,而且由于缺乏新发现的骨骼遗骸,经过相对较长的时间没有得到证实,但“物种”仍然存在于学者的脑海中,并存在于延伸到教科书中的科学文献中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Paleospecies as cognitive construct: The meme of “Homo floresiensis”
Abstract Creation and subsequent abandonment of a number of earlier species considered human ancestors: Eoanthropus dawsoni, Hesperopithecus haroldcooki, Homo gardarensis and Ramapithecus punjabicus is presented using cases from the history of science. This review indicates that the fossil evidence for these species has been questionable from the beginning but that mental images – memes – they invoked were attractive to students of human evolution and as such persisted even if not confirmed by further finds, with new research still being disputed. Against this background the status of the recent construction of the hominin species “Homo floresiensis” is discussed showing that despite dubious interpretations of the objective data and a relatively long time of non-confirmation due to paucity of newly discovered skeletal remains, the “species” still exists in minds of scholars and in the scientific literature extending into textbooks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anthropological Review
Anthropological Review Social Sciences-Anthropology
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
The anatomical bases of the 3D digital facial approximation of the Zlatý kůň 1 woman (ca. 43,000 BP) A review on association between menopausal symptoms and cardiovascular risk factors Hominin musical sound production: palaeoecological contexts and self domestication Association between expression level of the miR-320, miR-182, miR-223 and miR-486 and body composition among young Polish female volleyball players Revisiting the cranial variability of the Dmanisi hominins
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1