文章:欧洲宪法视野中的利益限制规则

Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI:10.54648/ecta2022006
Caroline Heber
{"title":"文章:欧洲宪法视野中的利益限制规则","authors":"Caroline Heber","doi":"10.54648/ecta2022006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the European level, the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD) introduced an interest limitation rule. The European legislature followed the recommendations of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), according to which interest limitation rules are a suitable instrument to address schemes that aim to shift profits to other jurisdictions and thereby erode tax bases of Member States. The existing German interest limitation rule and the case law of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) had a tremendous impact on the drafting of the European rule and thus the European legislature decided to expose both cross-border and purely domestic interest payments to the interest barrier. The article shows that the extension of the interest limitation rule to purely domestic situations violates the European principle of equal treatment. Against this background, the article proves that the European internal market allows the application of a European interest limitation rule only in cross-border situations.\nInterest limitation rule, principle of equal treatment, ATAD, internal market, fundamental freedoms, ability-to-pay principle, market neutrality, economic efficiency, principle of subsidiarity, internal market competence","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Article: The Interest Limitation Rule in the Light of European Constitutional Law\",\"authors\":\"Caroline Heber\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/ecta2022006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At the European level, the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD) introduced an interest limitation rule. The European legislature followed the recommendations of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), according to which interest limitation rules are a suitable instrument to address schemes that aim to shift profits to other jurisdictions and thereby erode tax bases of Member States. The existing German interest limitation rule and the case law of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) had a tremendous impact on the drafting of the European rule and thus the European legislature decided to expose both cross-border and purely domestic interest payments to the interest barrier. The article shows that the extension of the interest limitation rule to purely domestic situations violates the European principle of equal treatment. Against this background, the article proves that the European internal market allows the application of a European interest limitation rule only in cross-border situations.\\nInterest limitation rule, principle of equal treatment, ATAD, internal market, fundamental freedoms, ability-to-pay principle, market neutrality, economic efficiency, principle of subsidiarity, internal market competence\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2022006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2022006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在欧洲层面,《反避税指令》引入了一项利息限制规则。欧洲立法机构遵循了经济合作与发展组织(经合组织)的建议,根据该组织的建议,利息限制规则是解决旨在将利润转移到其他司法管辖区从而侵蚀成员国税基的计划的合适工具。德国现行的利息限制规则和欧洲法院(ECJ)的判例法对欧洲规则的起草产生了巨大影响,因此欧洲立法机构决定将跨境和纯国内利息支付置于利息壁垒之下。文章表明,将利益限制规则扩展到纯粹的国内情况违反了欧洲平等待遇原则。在此背景下,本文证明,欧洲内部市场只允许在跨境情况下适用欧洲利益限制规则。利益限制规则、平等待遇原则、ATAD、内部市场、基本自由、支付能力原则、市场中立性、经济效率、辅助性原则、内部市场竞争力
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Article: The Interest Limitation Rule in the Light of European Constitutional Law
At the European level, the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD) introduced an interest limitation rule. The European legislature followed the recommendations of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), according to which interest limitation rules are a suitable instrument to address schemes that aim to shift profits to other jurisdictions and thereby erode tax bases of Member States. The existing German interest limitation rule and the case law of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) had a tremendous impact on the drafting of the European rule and thus the European legislature decided to expose both cross-border and purely domestic interest payments to the interest barrier. The article shows that the extension of the interest limitation rule to purely domestic situations violates the European principle of equal treatment. Against this background, the article proves that the European internal market allows the application of a European interest limitation rule only in cross-border situations. Interest limitation rule, principle of equal treatment, ATAD, internal market, fundamental freedoms, ability-to-pay principle, market neutrality, economic efficiency, principle of subsidiarity, internal market competence
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1