南非集体诉讼的发展:我们通过判例法在哪里?

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q3 LAW South African Journal on Human Rights Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI:10.1080/02587203.2021.1974313
Moses Retselisitsoe Phooko
{"title":"南非集体诉讼的发展:我们通过判例法在哪里?","authors":"Moses Retselisitsoe Phooko","doi":"10.1080/02587203.2021.1974313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article analyses selected jurisprudence of various courts in South Africa on class actions. It traces the development of class actions since 1994 to date. The selected cases have been chosen because they demonstrate progression from courts’ initial narrow approach – where class actions were confined to cases involving violation of the rights contained in the Constitution to now extending them to claims outside the Bill of Rights. To a limited extent, the article borrows good practices from the developed Canadian law detailing their procedure for class actions as a comparison with the position in South Africa. The conclusion reached is that there has been a fair progress in the development of class actions.","PeriodicalId":44989,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal on Human Rights","volume":"37 1","pages":"7 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The development of class actions in South Africa: Where are we through case law?\",\"authors\":\"Moses Retselisitsoe Phooko\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02587203.2021.1974313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article analyses selected jurisprudence of various courts in South Africa on class actions. It traces the development of class actions since 1994 to date. The selected cases have been chosen because they demonstrate progression from courts’ initial narrow approach – where class actions were confined to cases involving violation of the rights contained in the Constitution to now extending them to claims outside the Bill of Rights. To a limited extent, the article borrows good practices from the developed Canadian law detailing their procedure for class actions as a comparison with the position in South Africa. The conclusion reached is that there has been a fair progress in the development of class actions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal on Human Rights\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"7 - 20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal on Human Rights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2021.1974313\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal on Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2021.1974313","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文分析了南非各法院关于集体诉讼的判例。它追溯了自1994年以来集体诉讼的发展。之所以选择这些案例,是因为它们表明法院从最初的狭隘做法——集体诉讼仅限于涉及侵犯《宪法》所载权利的案件——到现在将其扩展到《权利法案》以外的索赔——取得了进展。本文在一定程度上借鉴了加拿大发达法律的良好做法,详细介绍了其集体诉讼程序,并与南非的情况进行了比较。得出的结论是,集体诉讼的发展已经取得了相当大的进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The development of class actions in South Africa: Where are we through case law?
Abstract This article analyses selected jurisprudence of various courts in South Africa on class actions. It traces the development of class actions since 1994 to date. The selected cases have been chosen because they demonstrate progression from courts’ initial narrow approach – where class actions were confined to cases involving violation of the rights contained in the Constitution to now extending them to claims outside the Bill of Rights. To a limited extent, the article borrows good practices from the developed Canadian law detailing their procedure for class actions as a comparison with the position in South Africa. The conclusion reached is that there has been a fair progress in the development of class actions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
77.80%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Consulting citizens: Addressing the deficits in participatory democracy Ubuntu, human rights and sustainable development: Lessons from the African Arbitration Academy’s Model Bilateral Investment Treaty Research handbook on economic, social and cultural rights Augmentative and alternative communication in the South African justice system: Potential and pitfalls The importance of litigating the right to access sufficient food: Equal Education v Minister of Basic Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1