氮源不会改变粘土上玉米的形态生理特性

Rafael André Mergener, L. Sangoi, A. Coelho
{"title":"氮源不会改变粘土上玉米的形态生理特性","authors":"Rafael André Mergener, L. Sangoi, A. Coelho","doi":"10.18512/rbms2021vol20e1220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different nitrogen fertilizer sources and rates on the morphophysiological characteristics and nitrogen use efficiency of maize. The experiment was set in Campos Novos, Santa Catarina State, Brazil, during the 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 growing seasons. The experimental design was a randomized block with treatments arranged in split plots. Four nitrogen sources were evaluated in the main plots: conventional urea, protected urea, nitrification inhibitor-treated urea, and urease inhibitor-treated urea. Four nitrogen rates were assessed in the split plots: 0 (control), 140, 280, and 420 kg N ha-1..Nitrogen source did not affect ear height, leaf area index, stem diameter, or number of senescent leaves. Increments in nitrogen rate increased plant height, ear height, stem diameter, and grain nitrogen content but decreased nitrogen use efficiency. Stabilized (nitrification/urease inhibitor-treated) or protected N sources did not influence morphophysiological characteristics or improve nitrogen use efficiency of maize compared with conventional urea.","PeriodicalId":34859,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NITROGEN SOURCE DOES NOT CHANGE THE MORPHOPHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MAIZE ON A CLAY SOIL\",\"authors\":\"Rafael André Mergener, L. Sangoi, A. Coelho\",\"doi\":\"10.18512/rbms2021vol20e1220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different nitrogen fertilizer sources and rates on the morphophysiological characteristics and nitrogen use efficiency of maize. The experiment was set in Campos Novos, Santa Catarina State, Brazil, during the 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 growing seasons. The experimental design was a randomized block with treatments arranged in split plots. Four nitrogen sources were evaluated in the main plots: conventional urea, protected urea, nitrification inhibitor-treated urea, and urease inhibitor-treated urea. Four nitrogen rates were assessed in the split plots: 0 (control), 140, 280, and 420 kg N ha-1..Nitrogen source did not affect ear height, leaf area index, stem diameter, or number of senescent leaves. Increments in nitrogen rate increased plant height, ear height, stem diameter, and grain nitrogen content but decreased nitrogen use efficiency. Stabilized (nitrification/urease inhibitor-treated) or protected N sources did not influence morphophysiological characteristics or improve nitrogen use efficiency of maize compared with conventional urea.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34859,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18512/rbms2021vol20e1220\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18512/rbms2021vol20e1220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本试验旨在探讨不同氮肥来源和施氮量对玉米形态生理特性和氮素利用效率的影响。实验于2016/2017和2017/2018生长季节在巴西圣卡塔琳娜州坎波斯诺沃斯进行。试验设计为随机分组,将处理安排在分割区中。在主要样地评价了4种氮源:常规尿素、保护性尿素、硝化抑制剂处理尿素和脲酶抑制剂处理尿素。4种施氮量分别为0(对照)、140、280和420 kg N ha-1。氮源对穗高、叶面积指数、茎粗和衰老叶数无显著影响。施氮量的增加增加了株高、穗高、茎粗和籽粒含氮量,但降低了氮素利用效率。与常规尿素相比,稳定(硝化/脲酶抑制剂处理)或保护氮素源不影响玉米的形态生理特性或提高氮素利用效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NITROGEN SOURCE DOES NOT CHANGE THE MORPHOPHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MAIZE ON A CLAY SOIL
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different nitrogen fertilizer sources and rates on the morphophysiological characteristics and nitrogen use efficiency of maize. The experiment was set in Campos Novos, Santa Catarina State, Brazil, during the 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 growing seasons. The experimental design was a randomized block with treatments arranged in split plots. Four nitrogen sources were evaluated in the main plots: conventional urea, protected urea, nitrification inhibitor-treated urea, and urease inhibitor-treated urea. Four nitrogen rates were assessed in the split plots: 0 (control), 140, 280, and 420 kg N ha-1..Nitrogen source did not affect ear height, leaf area index, stem diameter, or number of senescent leaves. Increments in nitrogen rate increased plant height, ear height, stem diameter, and grain nitrogen content but decreased nitrogen use efficiency. Stabilized (nitrification/urease inhibitor-treated) or protected N sources did not influence morphophysiological characteristics or improve nitrogen use efficiency of maize compared with conventional urea.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
ISOLATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF BROAD-SPECTRUM ANTAGONIST BACTERIA AGAINST PATHOGENIC FUNGI OF MAIZE CROP PRODUÇÃO DE MILHO CULTIVADO COM APLICAÇÃO DE COMPOSTO DE ESTÁBULO Leaf appearance rate and phyllochron on millet sowing dates Early fertilization during winter cultivation and its residual effect on silage maize grown sequentially COMPARAÇÃO DE PROTOCOLOS PARA DUPLICAÇÃO CROMOSSÔMICA EM HAPLOIDES DE MILHO
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1