{"title":"从自在到惰性","authors":"Kimberly S. Engels","doi":"10.3167/SSI.2018.240105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on Sartre’s concept of the practicoinert\nin his major work A Critique of Dialectical Reason, Vol. 1\n(CDR). I first show the progression from Sartre’s previous conception\nof in-itself to his concept of practico-inert. I identify five different\nlayers of the practico-inert: human-made objects, language,\nideas, social objects and class being. I show how these practico-inert\nlayers form the possibilities for our subjectivity and how this represents\na change from Sartre’s view of in-itself in Being and Nothingness.\nI then explore the relationship of freedom to the practico-inert\nand how Sartre argues that the practico-inert places limits on our\nfreedom. Lastly, I argue that despite the pessimistic picture Sartre\npaints in CDR, the practico-inert has the potential to both limit and\nenhance our freedom. I appeal to Sartre’s post-CDR essay ‘A Plea\nfor Intellectuals’ to argue that a Sartrean account of progress\nrequires the utilisation of the practico-inert.","PeriodicalId":41680,"journal":{"name":"Sartre Studies International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3167/SSI.2018.240105","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From In-Itself to Practico-Inert\",\"authors\":\"Kimberly S. Engels\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/SSI.2018.240105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article focuses on Sartre’s concept of the practicoinert\\nin his major work A Critique of Dialectical Reason, Vol. 1\\n(CDR). I first show the progression from Sartre’s previous conception\\nof in-itself to his concept of practico-inert. I identify five different\\nlayers of the practico-inert: human-made objects, language,\\nideas, social objects and class being. I show how these practico-inert\\nlayers form the possibilities for our subjectivity and how this represents\\na change from Sartre’s view of in-itself in Being and Nothingness.\\nI then explore the relationship of freedom to the practico-inert\\nand how Sartre argues that the practico-inert places limits on our\\nfreedom. Lastly, I argue that despite the pessimistic picture Sartre\\npaints in CDR, the practico-inert has the potential to both limit and\\nenhance our freedom. I appeal to Sartre’s post-CDR essay ‘A Plea\\nfor Intellectuals’ to argue that a Sartrean account of progress\\nrequires the utilisation of the practico-inert.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sartre Studies International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3167/SSI.2018.240105\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sartre Studies International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/SSI.2018.240105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sartre Studies International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/SSI.2018.240105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
This article focuses on Sartre’s concept of the practicoinert
in his major work A Critique of Dialectical Reason, Vol. 1
(CDR). I first show the progression from Sartre’s previous conception
of in-itself to his concept of practico-inert. I identify five different
layers of the practico-inert: human-made objects, language,
ideas, social objects and class being. I show how these practico-inert
layers form the possibilities for our subjectivity and how this represents
a change from Sartre’s view of in-itself in Being and Nothingness.
I then explore the relationship of freedom to the practico-inert
and how Sartre argues that the practico-inert places limits on our
freedom. Lastly, I argue that despite the pessimistic picture Sartre
paints in CDR, the practico-inert has the potential to both limit and
enhance our freedom. I appeal to Sartre’s post-CDR essay ‘A Plea
for Intellectuals’ to argue that a Sartrean account of progress
requires the utilisation of the practico-inert.