{"title":"通过动态评估的教学强化计划发展第二语言写作能力","authors":"Lu Yu, Matthew E. Poehner","doi":"10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Adopting the framework of Dynamic Assessment (DA), this study investigates the effectiveness of a DA-informed writing enrichment program in promoting L2 English learners’ academic writing development. Thirteen ESL students recruited from a U.S. university were randomly assigned to a DA-informed enrichment program group (n = 6) or a standard writing instruction group (n = 7). Prior to and following the 5-week instructional programs (Time 1 and Time 2), each participant completed a source-based essay independently, engaged in interactionist DA with a mediator to jointly review the writing while referencing an analytic rubric, and then revised their essay. All drafts were blindly scored by independent raters. Results revealed that the enrichment group outperformed the standard instruction group in the independent writing performed at Time 2, indicating their differential level of development. Although both groups showed enhanced writing performance following the DA procedures at both Time 1 and Time 2, the enrichment learners responded more favorably to mediation during DA at Time 2, indicating their greater emerging abilities. Implications for tying DA results to an instructional program targeting learner emerging writing abilities are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Second Language Writing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing L2 writing abilities through an instructional enrichment program informed by dynamic assessment\",\"authors\":\"Lu Yu, Matthew E. Poehner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Adopting the framework of Dynamic Assessment (DA), this study investigates the effectiveness of a DA-informed writing enrichment program in promoting L2 English learners’ academic writing development. Thirteen ESL students recruited from a U.S. university were randomly assigned to a DA-informed enrichment program group (n = 6) or a standard writing instruction group (n = 7). Prior to and following the 5-week instructional programs (Time 1 and Time 2), each participant completed a source-based essay independently, engaged in interactionist DA with a mediator to jointly review the writing while referencing an analytic rubric, and then revised their essay. All drafts were blindly scored by independent raters. Results revealed that the enrichment group outperformed the standard instruction group in the independent writing performed at Time 2, indicating their differential level of development. Although both groups showed enhanced writing performance following the DA procedures at both Time 1 and Time 2, the enrichment learners responded more favorably to mediation during DA at Time 2, indicating their greater emerging abilities. Implications for tying DA results to an instructional program targeting learner emerging writing abilities are discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Second Language Writing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Second Language Writing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374323000516\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Second Language Writing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374323000516","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Developing L2 writing abilities through an instructional enrichment program informed by dynamic assessment
Adopting the framework of Dynamic Assessment (DA), this study investigates the effectiveness of a DA-informed writing enrichment program in promoting L2 English learners’ academic writing development. Thirteen ESL students recruited from a U.S. university were randomly assigned to a DA-informed enrichment program group (n = 6) or a standard writing instruction group (n = 7). Prior to and following the 5-week instructional programs (Time 1 and Time 2), each participant completed a source-based essay independently, engaged in interactionist DA with a mediator to jointly review the writing while referencing an analytic rubric, and then revised their essay. All drafts were blindly scored by independent raters. Results revealed that the enrichment group outperformed the standard instruction group in the independent writing performed at Time 2, indicating their differential level of development. Although both groups showed enhanced writing performance following the DA procedures at both Time 1 and Time 2, the enrichment learners responded more favorably to mediation during DA at Time 2, indicating their greater emerging abilities. Implications for tying DA results to an instructional program targeting learner emerging writing abilities are discussed.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Second Language Writing is devoted to publishing theoretically grounded reports of research and discussions that represent a significant contribution to current understandings of central issues in second and foreign language writing and writing instruction. Some areas of interest are personal characteristics and attitudes of L2 writers, L2 writers'' composing processes, features of L2 writers'' texts, readers'' responses to L2 writing, assessment/evaluation of L2 writing, contexts (cultural, social, political, institutional) for L2 writing, and any other topic clearly relevant to L2 writing theory, research, or instruction.