风对带有护墙的大型低斜山墙屋顶建筑产生的压力

IF 1.8 3区 艺术学 N/A ARCHITECTURE Architectural Science Review Pub Date : 2023-02-06 DOI:10.1080/00038628.2023.2174066
A. Aly, M. Thomas
{"title":"风对带有护墙的大型低斜山墙屋顶建筑产生的压力","authors":"A. Aly, M. Thomas","doi":"10.1080/00038628.2023.2174066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper experimentally investigates how parapets with varying heights can alter the flow pattern around a large aspect-ratio low-sloped gable roof building. We examine the benefits and challenges of existing methods and utilize an open-jet wind test section, to accurately simulate real-world atmospheric boundary layer conditions. A model of a low-rise building was fitted with solid parapets of varying heights and tested in a comparative study to understand their impact on roof pressures. The study compares the standard approach to the experimental results and suggests improvements to wind zones and pressure coefficients. The parapet of fourteen percent of the building height is the most efficient at reducing mean, peak, and area-averaged wind loads compared to other sizes. However, the standard provisions underestimate roof pressures for components and cladding design.","PeriodicalId":47295,"journal":{"name":"Architectural Science Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wind induced pressures on a large low-sloped gable roof building with parapet\",\"authors\":\"A. Aly, M. Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00038628.2023.2174066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper experimentally investigates how parapets with varying heights can alter the flow pattern around a large aspect-ratio low-sloped gable roof building. We examine the benefits and challenges of existing methods and utilize an open-jet wind test section, to accurately simulate real-world atmospheric boundary layer conditions. A model of a low-rise building was fitted with solid parapets of varying heights and tested in a comparative study to understand their impact on roof pressures. The study compares the standard approach to the experimental results and suggests improvements to wind zones and pressure coefficients. The parapet of fourteen percent of the building height is the most efficient at reducing mean, peak, and area-averaged wind loads compared to other sizes. However, the standard provisions underestimate roof pressures for components and cladding design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Architectural Science Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Architectural Science Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2023.2174066\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architectural Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2023.2174066","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过实验研究了不同高度的护墙如何改变大纵横比低坡山墙屋顶建筑周围的流动模式。我们研究了现有方法的优点和挑战,并利用开放式喷气风试验段来准确模拟真实世界的大气边界层条件。一个低层建筑模型安装了不同高度的实心护墙,并在一项比较研究中进行了测试,以了解它们对屋顶压力的影响。该研究将标准方法与实验结果进行了比较,并建议改进风区和压力系数。与其他尺寸相比,建筑高度14%的女儿墙在降低平均、峰值和面积平均风荷载方面最有效。然而,标准规定低估了构件和覆层设计的屋顶压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Wind induced pressures on a large low-sloped gable roof building with parapet
This paper experimentally investigates how parapets with varying heights can alter the flow pattern around a large aspect-ratio low-sloped gable roof building. We examine the benefits and challenges of existing methods and utilize an open-jet wind test section, to accurately simulate real-world atmospheric boundary layer conditions. A model of a low-rise building was fitted with solid parapets of varying heights and tested in a comparative study to understand their impact on roof pressures. The study compares the standard approach to the experimental results and suggests improvements to wind zones and pressure coefficients. The parapet of fourteen percent of the building height is the most efficient at reducing mean, peak, and area-averaged wind loads compared to other sizes. However, the standard provisions underestimate roof pressures for components and cladding design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Founded at the University of Sydney in 1958 by Professor Henry Cowan to promote continued professional development, Architectural Science Review presents a balanced collection of papers on a wide range of topics. From its first issue over 50 years ago the journal documents the profession’s interest in environmental issues, covering topics such as thermal comfort, lighting, and sustainable architecture, contributing to this extensive field of knowledge by seeking papers from a broad geographical area. The journal is supported by an international editorial advisory board of the leading international academics and its reputation has increased globally with individual and institutional subscribers and contributors from around the world. As a result, Architectural Science Review continues to be recognised as not only one of the first, but the leading journal devoted to architectural science, technology and the built environment. Architectural Science Review publishes original research papers, shorter research notes, and abstracts of PhD dissertations and theses in all areas of architectural science including: -building science and technology -environmental sustainability -structures and materials -audio and acoustics -illumination -thermal systems -building physics -building services -building climatology -building economics -ergonomics -history and theory of architectural science -the social sciences of architecture
期刊最新文献
Adopting smart technologies to encourage active transportation: a survey of pedestrians and cyclists in Perth, Western Australia Comparison of design education documents and the disconnect between designer priorities, tools, and occupant assumptions Questioning the appropriate angle of view to represent the visual perception of streets: possible answers from a preliminary study Professional architects’ design trade-offs in reinforcement learning-powered agent-based simulation Emergence of eye-tracking in architectural research: a review of studies 1976–2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1