物质与非物质:舞蹈与非物质文化遗产保护

IF 0.3 3区 艺术学 0 DANCE Dance Research Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.3366/drs.2023.0390
J. Carr
{"title":"物质与非物质:舞蹈与非物质文化遗产保护","authors":"J. Carr","doi":"10.3366/drs.2023.0390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article returns to issues raised in the pages of this journal regarding dance in the context of UNESCO's 2003 adoption of the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. 1 Bakka and Karoblis' article published in 2021 2 refuted the proposal made by Iacono and Brown in 2016 3 to replace the Convention's term ‘Intangible Cultural Heritage’ (ICH) with the concept of ‘living cultural heritage’. However, Bakka and Karoblis' response was written in the spirit of ‘a discursive unity’ 4 and, sharing in this spirit, I aim to consider both articles with the aim of highlighting how the discourses surrounding safeguarding ICH and those that consider dance as a significant part of culture might inform one another.","PeriodicalId":42392,"journal":{"name":"Dance Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Tangible and Intangible: Dance and the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage\",\"authors\":\"J. Carr\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/drs.2023.0390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article returns to issues raised in the pages of this journal regarding dance in the context of UNESCO's 2003 adoption of the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. 1 Bakka and Karoblis' article published in 2021 2 refuted the proposal made by Iacono and Brown in 2016 3 to replace the Convention's term ‘Intangible Cultural Heritage’ (ICH) with the concept of ‘living cultural heritage’. However, Bakka and Karoblis' response was written in the spirit of ‘a discursive unity’ 4 and, sharing in this spirit, I aim to consider both articles with the aim of highlighting how the discourses surrounding safeguarding ICH and those that consider dance as a significant part of culture might inform one another.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dance Research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dance Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/drs.2023.0390\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"DANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dance Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/drs.2023.0390","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"DANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章回到了本杂志在2003年联合国教科文组织通过《保护非物质文化遗产公约》的背景下提出的关于舞蹈的问题。1 Bakka和Karoblis在2021年发表的文章2驳斥了Iacono和Brown在2016年提出的用“活文化遗产”的概念取代公约中“非物质文化遗产”(ICH)一词的建议。然而,Bakka和Karoblis的回应是本着“话语统一”的精神写的,本着这种精神,我打算考虑这两篇文章,目的是强调围绕保护非物质文化遗产的话语和那些将舞蹈视为文化重要组成部分的话语如何相互交流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Tangible and Intangible: Dance and the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage
This article returns to issues raised in the pages of this journal regarding dance in the context of UNESCO's 2003 adoption of the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. 1 Bakka and Karoblis' article published in 2021 2 refuted the proposal made by Iacono and Brown in 2016 3 to replace the Convention's term ‘Intangible Cultural Heritage’ (ICH) with the concept of ‘living cultural heritage’. However, Bakka and Karoblis' response was written in the spirit of ‘a discursive unity’ 4 and, sharing in this spirit, I aim to consider both articles with the aim of highlighting how the discourses surrounding safeguarding ICH and those that consider dance as a significant part of culture might inform one another.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Bruce Baird, A History of Butô Performing for Napoleon: Production Quarrels at the Paris Opéra Ecosystemic Practice-Research (for the Benefit of Others) Grace Barnes, National Identity and the British Musical So Revealing: Ballerinas on Antebellum US Stages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1