Marilyn Cochran-Smith, C. Craig, L. Orland‐Barak, Chelsea Cole, Valerie Hill-Jackson
{"title":"代理人、代理和教师教育","authors":"Marilyn Cochran-Smith, C. Craig, L. Orland‐Barak, Chelsea Cole, Valerie Hill-Jackson","doi":"10.1177/00224871221123724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Goodlad believed that teachers played a central role in schooling, which was a moral enterprise that shaped our changing democratic society. However, in visits to colleges and universities across the nation, Goodlad and his colleagues found that almost no teacher education programs included preparing teachers to be agents of change as part of their purpose. He lamented, “Somehow, the idea that we are our own best agents of change and the will to act have taken a second seat to quiescence” (p. 398). Perhaps times have not changed so much in terms of excoriating critiques of teacher education from both insiders and outsiders. But they have changed in terms of teacher education and agency. Today, many topics related to teacher agency are of central interest in teacher education research, practice, and policy, including conceptualizing teacher agency; preparing agentic educators across the lifespan; the role of teacher agency in curriculum change, social justice agendas, and school reform; and, teacher agency in the face of restrictive performativity and other policies.1 In this editorial, we consider three key ideas related to teacher agency that we think are especially important for teacher education.","PeriodicalId":17162,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Teacher Education","volume":"73 1","pages":"445 - 448"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agents, Agency, and Teacher Education\",\"authors\":\"Marilyn Cochran-Smith, C. Craig, L. Orland‐Barak, Chelsea Cole, Valerie Hill-Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00224871221123724\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Goodlad believed that teachers played a central role in schooling, which was a moral enterprise that shaped our changing democratic society. However, in visits to colleges and universities across the nation, Goodlad and his colleagues found that almost no teacher education programs included preparing teachers to be agents of change as part of their purpose. He lamented, “Somehow, the idea that we are our own best agents of change and the will to act have taken a second seat to quiescence” (p. 398). Perhaps times have not changed so much in terms of excoriating critiques of teacher education from both insiders and outsiders. But they have changed in terms of teacher education and agency. Today, many topics related to teacher agency are of central interest in teacher education research, practice, and policy, including conceptualizing teacher agency; preparing agentic educators across the lifespan; the role of teacher agency in curriculum change, social justice agendas, and school reform; and, teacher agency in the face of restrictive performativity and other policies.1 In this editorial, we consider three key ideas related to teacher agency that we think are especially important for teacher education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Teacher Education\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"445 - 448\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871221123724\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871221123724","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Goodlad believed that teachers played a central role in schooling, which was a moral enterprise that shaped our changing democratic society. However, in visits to colleges and universities across the nation, Goodlad and his colleagues found that almost no teacher education programs included preparing teachers to be agents of change as part of their purpose. He lamented, “Somehow, the idea that we are our own best agents of change and the will to act have taken a second seat to quiescence” (p. 398). Perhaps times have not changed so much in terms of excoriating critiques of teacher education from both insiders and outsiders. But they have changed in terms of teacher education and agency. Today, many topics related to teacher agency are of central interest in teacher education research, practice, and policy, including conceptualizing teacher agency; preparing agentic educators across the lifespan; the role of teacher agency in curriculum change, social justice agendas, and school reform; and, teacher agency in the face of restrictive performativity and other policies.1 In this editorial, we consider three key ideas related to teacher agency that we think are especially important for teacher education.
期刊介绍:
The mission of the Journal of Teacher Education, the flagship journal of AACTE, is to serve as a research forum for a diverse group of scholars who are invested in the preparation and continued support of teachers and who can have a significant voice in discussions and decision-making around issues of teacher education. One of the fundamental goals of the journal is the use of evidence from rigorous investigation to identify and address the increasingly complex issues confronting teacher education at the national and global levels. These issues include but are not limited to preparing teachers to effectively address the needs of marginalized youth, their families and communities; program design and impact; selection, recruitment and retention of teachers from underrepresented groups; local and national policy; accountability; and routes to certification. JTE does not publish book reviews, program evaluations or articles solely describing programs, program components, courses or personal experiences. In addition, JTE does not accept manuscripts that are solely about the development or validation of an instrument unless the use of that instrument yields data providing new insights into issues of relevance to teacher education (MSU, February 2016).