以善变恶:组织公民行为与被煽动的不文明行为关系的道德许可观

IF 2.9 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Human Performance Pub Date : 2023-08-20 DOI:10.1080/08959285.2023.2248961
Ian M. Hughes, Zachary J. Levey, Juseob Lee, S. Jex
{"title":"以善变恶:组织公民行为与被煽动的不文明行为关系的道德许可观","authors":"Ian M. Hughes, Zachary J. Levey, Juseob Lee, S. Jex","doi":"10.1080/08959285.2023.2248961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The present research examines the relations between OCB and interpersonal mistreatment from the lens of the Moral Balance Model, wherein good deeds provide moral credits that enable immoral behavior. We suggest that OCB may license engagement in morally equivalent forms of interpersonal mistreatment, such as instigated incivility, and not more immoral forms of mistreatment, such as interpersonally targeted counterproductive work behavior (CWB-I). Moreover, we posit that the licensing effects of OCB likely occur quickly, such as across a typical work week. Across two studies (N Study 1 = 209, N Study 2 = 192), we largely find support for our propositions. In our first study, using a rating task, we find that certain forms of instigated incivility are more theoretically suited for tests of OCB-related moral licensing when compared to CWB-I. Then, in our second study using a within-week time-lagged sample of service employees, we find that OCB at the beginning of the week relates to two kinds of instigated incivility (i.e. privacy invasion and exclusionary behavior) at the end of the week through moral credits gained at the middle of the week. As anticipated, these moral credits did not license engagement in CWB-I. Implications for research and practice are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47825,"journal":{"name":"Human Performance","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Doing Good to Be (Subtly) Bad: A Moral Licensing View on the Relations Between Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Instigated Incivility\",\"authors\":\"Ian M. Hughes, Zachary J. Levey, Juseob Lee, S. Jex\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08959285.2023.2248961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The present research examines the relations between OCB and interpersonal mistreatment from the lens of the Moral Balance Model, wherein good deeds provide moral credits that enable immoral behavior. We suggest that OCB may license engagement in morally equivalent forms of interpersonal mistreatment, such as instigated incivility, and not more immoral forms of mistreatment, such as interpersonally targeted counterproductive work behavior (CWB-I). Moreover, we posit that the licensing effects of OCB likely occur quickly, such as across a typical work week. Across two studies (N Study 1 = 209, N Study 2 = 192), we largely find support for our propositions. In our first study, using a rating task, we find that certain forms of instigated incivility are more theoretically suited for tests of OCB-related moral licensing when compared to CWB-I. Then, in our second study using a within-week time-lagged sample of service employees, we find that OCB at the beginning of the week relates to two kinds of instigated incivility (i.e. privacy invasion and exclusionary behavior) at the end of the week through moral credits gained at the middle of the week. As anticipated, these moral credits did not license engagement in CWB-I. Implications for research and practice are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47825,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Performance\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2023.2248961\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Performance","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2023.2248961","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Doing Good to Be (Subtly) Bad: A Moral Licensing View on the Relations Between Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Instigated Incivility
ABSTRACT The present research examines the relations between OCB and interpersonal mistreatment from the lens of the Moral Balance Model, wherein good deeds provide moral credits that enable immoral behavior. We suggest that OCB may license engagement in morally equivalent forms of interpersonal mistreatment, such as instigated incivility, and not more immoral forms of mistreatment, such as interpersonally targeted counterproductive work behavior (CWB-I). Moreover, we posit that the licensing effects of OCB likely occur quickly, such as across a typical work week. Across two studies (N Study 1 = 209, N Study 2 = 192), we largely find support for our propositions. In our first study, using a rating task, we find that certain forms of instigated incivility are more theoretically suited for tests of OCB-related moral licensing when compared to CWB-I. Then, in our second study using a within-week time-lagged sample of service employees, we find that OCB at the beginning of the week relates to two kinds of instigated incivility (i.e. privacy invasion and exclusionary behavior) at the end of the week through moral credits gained at the middle of the week. As anticipated, these moral credits did not license engagement in CWB-I. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Performance
Human Performance PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Human Performance publishes research investigating the nature and role of performance in the workplace and in organizational settings and offers a rich variety of information going beyond the study of traditional job behavior. Dedicated to presenting original research, theory, and measurement methods, the journal investigates individual, team, and firm level performance factors that influence work and organizational effectiveness. Human Performance is a respected forum for behavioral scientists interested in variables that motivate and promote high-level human performance, particularly in organizational and occupational settings. The journal seeks to identify and stimulate relevant research, communication, and theory concerning human capabilities and effectiveness. It serves as a valuable intellectual link between such disciplines as industrial-organizational psychology, individual differences, work physiology, organizational behavior, human resource management, and human factors.
期刊最新文献
The Normative Judgment Test of Honesty-Humility: An Implicit Instrument for Organizational Contexts Mechanisms Underlying the Use of Power-Creativity Relationship in the Military: Achievement Motivation and Identification Authentic Leadership’s Impact on Follower Psychological Capital and Performance Through Organizational Identification and Role Clarity Doing Good to Be (Subtly) Bad: A Moral Licensing View on the Relations Between Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Instigated Incivility Toxic Triads: Supervisor Characteristics, Subordinate Self-Esteem, and Supervisor Stressors in Relation to Perceptions of Abusive Supervision
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1