叙事权威的游戏:《斯坦利寓言》中的颠覆性徘徊与不可靠叙事

IF 0.7 Q3 COMMUNICATION Journal of Gaming and Virtual Worlds Pub Date : 2020-03-01 DOI:10.1386/jgvw_00002_1
Sarah E. Beyvers
{"title":"叙事权威的游戏:《斯坦利寓言》中的颠覆性徘徊与不可靠叙事","authors":"Sarah E. Beyvers","doi":"10.1386/jgvw_00002_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores how players’ attempts at subversive wandering in The Stanley Parable (2013) render the game’s narration unreliable and thus reveal its comments on the nature of ‘agency’ in video games. Unreliability brings the act of narration itself\n to the fore and exposes its mechanisms of manipulation. Players of The Stanley Parable may seek to contradict the voice-over narration subversively. They must find out, however, that, even though the narrator’s authorial omniscience and power are an illusion, they cannot break\n away from the predetermined path the game lays out. The narrator and the player are constantly fighting over who gets to tell the story and who therefore wins the game of narrative authority. Subversive wandering, as will be theorized in this article, exposes the impossibility of true player\n agency in the game’s set structure and comments on how player movement and interaction construct parts of a game’s narrative.","PeriodicalId":43635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gaming and Virtual Worlds","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The game of narrative authority: Subversive wandering and unreliable narration in The Stanley Parable\",\"authors\":\"Sarah E. Beyvers\",\"doi\":\"10.1386/jgvw_00002_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores how players’ attempts at subversive wandering in The Stanley Parable (2013) render the game’s narration unreliable and thus reveal its comments on the nature of ‘agency’ in video games. Unreliability brings the act of narration itself\\n to the fore and exposes its mechanisms of manipulation. Players of The Stanley Parable may seek to contradict the voice-over narration subversively. They must find out, however, that, even though the narrator’s authorial omniscience and power are an illusion, they cannot break\\n away from the predetermined path the game lays out. The narrator and the player are constantly fighting over who gets to tell the story and who therefore wins the game of narrative authority. Subversive wandering, as will be theorized in this article, exposes the impossibility of true player\\n agency in the game’s set structure and comments on how player movement and interaction construct parts of a game’s narrative.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gaming and Virtual Worlds\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gaming and Virtual Worlds\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1386/jgvw_00002_1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gaming and Virtual Worlds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/jgvw_00002_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了玩家在《斯坦利寓言》(2013)中的颠覆性漫游尝试如何使游戏的叙述变得不可靠,从而揭示了其对电子游戏中“代理”性质的评论。不可靠性使叙述行为本身凸显出来,并暴露出其操纵机制。《斯坦利寓言》的玩家可能会试图颠覆性地反驳画外音的叙述。然而,他们必须发现,即使叙述者的作者全知性和力量是一种幻觉,他们也无法脱离游戏所设定的预定路径。叙述者和玩家不断地为谁能讲述故事以及谁因此赢得叙事权威的游戏而争吵。颠覆性徘徊,正如本文所理论的那样,揭示了在游戏的设定结构中真正的玩家代理的不可能,并评论了玩家的运动和互动如何构成游戏叙事的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The game of narrative authority: Subversive wandering and unreliable narration in The Stanley Parable
This article explores how players’ attempts at subversive wandering in The Stanley Parable (2013) render the game’s narration unreliable and thus reveal its comments on the nature of ‘agency’ in video games. Unreliability brings the act of narration itself to the fore and exposes its mechanisms of manipulation. Players of The Stanley Parable may seek to contradict the voice-over narration subversively. They must find out, however, that, even though the narrator’s authorial omniscience and power are an illusion, they cannot break away from the predetermined path the game lays out. The narrator and the player are constantly fighting over who gets to tell the story and who therefore wins the game of narrative authority. Subversive wandering, as will be theorized in this article, exposes the impossibility of true player agency in the game’s set structure and comments on how player movement and interaction construct parts of a game’s narrative.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
25.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Board Games as Media, Paul Booth (2021) Continual creation: Idealism, metaphor and the representation of spatio-temporality Playing farmer: At the intersections of neo-liberal capitalism and ecocriticism in Stardew Valley Digital games and the category of auteur: The case of Muriel Tramis Cyberpunk Culture and Psychology: Seeing through the Mirrorshades, Anna Mcfarlane (2022)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1