ICU出院时的FSS-ICU评分因急症后护理处置而异

IF 0.5 Q4 REHABILITATION Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2021-06-28 DOI:10.1097/JAT.0000000000000177
J. Skrzat, Michael Pechulis, Marcel DiFiore, Amanda Fink, George Fischer, Marian Jordan, Erika M Lebron, Alyssa Rieger
{"title":"ICU出院时的FSS-ICU评分因急症后护理处置而异","authors":"J. Skrzat, Michael Pechulis, Marcel DiFiore, Amanda Fink, George Fischer, Marian Jordan, Erika M Lebron, Alyssa Rieger","doi":"10.1097/JAT.0000000000000177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To determine whether Functional Status Score for the Intensive Care Unit (FSS-ICU) scores acquired within 24 hours of medical-surgical intensive care unit (MSICU) discharge differ among postacute care discharge dispositions in a nonsurgical patient population. Methods: A retrospective medical record review for data collection was conducted over 12 months for patients in an MSICU. FSS-ICU scores were collected within 24 hours of MSICU discharge. Subjects were categorized into 4 postacute care discharge dispositions: home, subacute rehabilitation (SAR), inpatient rehabilitation (IP), or other. A 1-way analysis of variance and post hoc analyses were performed. Results: One hundred fifteen subjects were included. FSS-ICU scores acquired within 24 hours of MSICU discharge were significantly different (P < .001) between postacute care discharge dispositions. Post hoc analysis showed a statistically significant difference between home and SAR (P < .001), home and IP (P < .001), and home and other (P = .005). Conclusions: A difference was found in FSS-ICU scores acquired within 24 hours of MSICU discharge between home and all other postacute care discharge dispositions in a nonsurgical patient population. An FSS-ICU score less than 27 at MSICU discharge indicates that discharge planning to a postacute care discharge disposition other than home may be warranted.","PeriodicalId":42472,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FSS-ICU Scores at ICU Discharge Differ Across Postacute Care Dispositions\",\"authors\":\"J. Skrzat, Michael Pechulis, Marcel DiFiore, Amanda Fink, George Fischer, Marian Jordan, Erika M Lebron, Alyssa Rieger\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JAT.0000000000000177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To determine whether Functional Status Score for the Intensive Care Unit (FSS-ICU) scores acquired within 24 hours of medical-surgical intensive care unit (MSICU) discharge differ among postacute care discharge dispositions in a nonsurgical patient population. Methods: A retrospective medical record review for data collection was conducted over 12 months for patients in an MSICU. FSS-ICU scores were collected within 24 hours of MSICU discharge. Subjects were categorized into 4 postacute care discharge dispositions: home, subacute rehabilitation (SAR), inpatient rehabilitation (IP), or other. A 1-way analysis of variance and post hoc analyses were performed. Results: One hundred fifteen subjects were included. FSS-ICU scores acquired within 24 hours of MSICU discharge were significantly different (P < .001) between postacute care discharge dispositions. Post hoc analysis showed a statistically significant difference between home and SAR (P < .001), home and IP (P < .001), and home and other (P = .005). Conclusions: A difference was found in FSS-ICU scores acquired within 24 hours of MSICU discharge between home and all other postacute care discharge dispositions in a nonsurgical patient population. An FSS-ICU score less than 27 at MSICU discharge indicates that discharge planning to a postacute care discharge disposition other than home may be warranted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JAT.0000000000000177\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JAT.0000000000000177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定在非手术患者群体中,在医疗外科重症监护室(MSICU)出院后24小时内获得的重症监护室功能状态评分(FSS-ICU)评分在急性护理出院后的处理方式之间是否存在差异。方法:对MSICU中的患者进行为期12个月的数据收集回顾性医疗记录审查。在MSICU出院后24小时内收集FSS-ICU评分。受试者被分为4种急性后护理出院处置:家庭、亚急性康复(SAR)、住院康复(IP)或其他。进行了单向方差分析和事后分析。结果:115名受试者被纳入研究。MSICU出院后24小时内获得的FSS-ICU评分在急性护理出院后处理之间存在显著差异(P<.001)。事后分析显示,家庭和SAR(P<.001)、家庭和IP(P<.001)以及家庭和其他(P=.005)之间存在统计学显著差异。结论:在非手术患者群体中,家庭和所有其他急性护理出院后处置之间,MSICU出院后24小时内获得的FSS-ICU评分存在差异。MSICU出院时FSS-ICU评分低于27表明,可能有必要对非家庭的急性后护理出院处置进行出院计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FSS-ICU Scores at ICU Discharge Differ Across Postacute Care Dispositions
Purpose: To determine whether Functional Status Score for the Intensive Care Unit (FSS-ICU) scores acquired within 24 hours of medical-surgical intensive care unit (MSICU) discharge differ among postacute care discharge dispositions in a nonsurgical patient population. Methods: A retrospective medical record review for data collection was conducted over 12 months for patients in an MSICU. FSS-ICU scores were collected within 24 hours of MSICU discharge. Subjects were categorized into 4 postacute care discharge dispositions: home, subacute rehabilitation (SAR), inpatient rehabilitation (IP), or other. A 1-way analysis of variance and post hoc analyses were performed. Results: One hundred fifteen subjects were included. FSS-ICU scores acquired within 24 hours of MSICU discharge were significantly different (P < .001) between postacute care discharge dispositions. Post hoc analysis showed a statistically significant difference between home and SAR (P < .001), home and IP (P < .001), and home and other (P = .005). Conclusions: A difference was found in FSS-ICU scores acquired within 24 hours of MSICU discharge between home and all other postacute care discharge dispositions in a nonsurgical patient population. An FSS-ICU score less than 27 at MSICU discharge indicates that discharge planning to a postacute care discharge disposition other than home may be warranted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
40.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Creating Value Together: A Triad of Clinicians, Administrators, and Researchers Overcoming Barriers to Unique Valuation of Acute Care Physical Therapy Where Do We Go From Here? An Editor's Update on the Journal Exploring the Addition of Simulation-Based Learning Experiences to Prepare Student Physical Therapist Assistants for Inpatient Clinical Experience Mobility Checklist for Patients With Advanced Heart Failure and a Femoral Intra-aortic Balloon Pump
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1