印尼行政法院绝对权限延伸后有障碍吗?

Kadek Agus Sudiarawan, I. G. N. Wairocana, Bagus Hermanto
{"title":"印尼行政法院绝对权限延伸后有障碍吗?","authors":"Kadek Agus Sudiarawan, I. G. N. Wairocana, Bagus Hermanto","doi":"10.31603/VARIAJUSTICIA.V16I2.3590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The enactment of the Law Number 30 Year 2014 regarding Government Administration with the expansion of Administrative Court competence stimulate confusion and obstacles in norms and theoretical also practical obstacles for the justice enforcers especially Administrative Court Judges. On the other hand, this law is contrary and potentially conflict with Government Administration Law. To resolve this legal problem, Indonesia Supreme Court issuing several Supreme Court Regulation and Circular Letter of Supreme Court for each expansion of Administrative Court competence otherwise the confusion and obstacle in theoretical and practical spheres still conducted the problem for the justice enforcers. This study has aims to analyze and discuss concerning confusion and obstacles faced by enforcers especially Administrative Court Judges and the attitude or solution towards those obstacles. This study is using normative and empirical method with qualitative types as a descriptive analysis article.","PeriodicalId":31904,"journal":{"name":"Varia Justicia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are there Obstacles after the Administrative Court Absolute Competence Extension of Indonesia?\",\"authors\":\"Kadek Agus Sudiarawan, I. G. N. Wairocana, Bagus Hermanto\",\"doi\":\"10.31603/VARIAJUSTICIA.V16I2.3590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The enactment of the Law Number 30 Year 2014 regarding Government Administration with the expansion of Administrative Court competence stimulate confusion and obstacles in norms and theoretical also practical obstacles for the justice enforcers especially Administrative Court Judges. On the other hand, this law is contrary and potentially conflict with Government Administration Law. To resolve this legal problem, Indonesia Supreme Court issuing several Supreme Court Regulation and Circular Letter of Supreme Court for each expansion of Administrative Court competence otherwise the confusion and obstacle in theoretical and practical spheres still conducted the problem for the justice enforcers. This study has aims to analyze and discuss concerning confusion and obstacles faced by enforcers especially Administrative Court Judges and the attitude or solution towards those obstacles. This study is using normative and empirical method with qualitative types as a descriptive analysis article.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Varia Justicia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Varia Justicia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31603/VARIAJUSTICIA.V16I2.3590\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Varia Justicia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31603/VARIAJUSTICIA.V16I2.3590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

随着行政法院权限的扩大,2014年颁布了关于政府行政的第30号法律,这给执法者特别是行政法院法官带来了规范上的混乱和障碍,以及理论和实践上的障碍。另一方面,该法律与《政府行政法》相悖,并可能与之相冲突。为了解决这一法律问题,印度尼西亚最高法院为每一次行政法院权限的扩大发布了几项最高法院条例和最高法院通函,否则理论和实践领域的混乱和障碍仍然困扰着执法者。本研究旨在分析和讨论执法者,特别是行政法院法官所面临的困惑和障碍,以及对这些障碍的态度或解决方案。本研究采用规范与实证相结合的定性分析方法作为描述性分析文章。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are there Obstacles after the Administrative Court Absolute Competence Extension of Indonesia?
The enactment of the Law Number 30 Year 2014 regarding Government Administration with the expansion of Administrative Court competence stimulate confusion and obstacles in norms and theoretical also practical obstacles for the justice enforcers especially Administrative Court Judges. On the other hand, this law is contrary and potentially conflict with Government Administration Law. To resolve this legal problem, Indonesia Supreme Court issuing several Supreme Court Regulation and Circular Letter of Supreme Court for each expansion of Administrative Court competence otherwise the confusion and obstacle in theoretical and practical spheres still conducted the problem for the justice enforcers. This study has aims to analyze and discuss concerning confusion and obstacles faced by enforcers especially Administrative Court Judges and the attitude or solution towards those obstacles. This study is using normative and empirical method with qualitative types as a descriptive analysis article.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Police Brutality as Human Rights Violation: A Study Case of Black Lives Matter Legal Reconstruction of Indonesian Banking Laws: Challenges and Opportunities for Digital Bank Regulation Government Capacity to Guarantee Halal Product from Micro, Small, And Medium Enterprises in Kebumen Environmental Court and Principle of Good Environmental Governance in Enforcing Environmental Law Technology Company Merger and Acquisition: a Study of Indonesian and European Union Competition Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1