M. Maldaner, F. Vaz-de-Mello, D. Takiya, D. C. Ferreira
{"title":"金翅金龟科金翅金龟科金翅金龟科金翅金龟科金翅金龟科金翅金龟科金翅金龟科金翅金龟科金翅金龟科金翅金龟的分子系统学研究","authors":"M. Maldaner, F. Vaz-de-Mello, D. Takiya, D. C. Ferreira","doi":"10.1163/1876312X-00002198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coprophanaeus ( Megaphanaeus ) d’Olsoufieff, 1924 has four valid species: C. lancifer (Linne, 1767), C. ensifer (Germar, 1821), C. bonariensis (Gory, 1844) and C. bellicosus (Olivier, 1789). However, authors disagree about the placement of C. bellicosus . Thus, our aims were (I) to test if Megaphanaeus is a monophyletic group and (II) verify to which subgenus C. bellicosus belongs. We sequenced three mitochondrial and one nuclear marker for ten Phanaeini species: COI (672bp), COI-II (1326bp), 16S (527bp) and 28S (994bp). For fifteen species we sequenced two markers, COI (681pb) and 16S (532pb). Both matrices were analyzed under three methods of phylogenetic inference: Maximum Parsimony, Maximum Likelihood, and Bayesian Inference. Megaphanaeus is here considered monophyletic including C. bellicosus as sister-group to ( C. bonariensis ( C. lancifer + C. ensifer )). All analyses recovered the non-monophyly of both C. lancifer and C. ensifer , because of a population of C. lancifer grouped with C. ensifer specimens.","PeriodicalId":54975,"journal":{"name":"Insect Systematics & Evolution","volume":"-1 1","pages":"241-255"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/1876312X-00002198","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Molecular Phylogeny of Coprophanaeus (Megaphanaeus) d’Olsoufieff, 1924 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) and the position of C. bellicosus\",\"authors\":\"M. Maldaner, F. Vaz-de-Mello, D. Takiya, D. C. Ferreira\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/1876312X-00002198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Coprophanaeus ( Megaphanaeus ) d’Olsoufieff, 1924 has four valid species: C. lancifer (Linne, 1767), C. ensifer (Germar, 1821), C. bonariensis (Gory, 1844) and C. bellicosus (Olivier, 1789). However, authors disagree about the placement of C. bellicosus . Thus, our aims were (I) to test if Megaphanaeus is a monophyletic group and (II) verify to which subgenus C. bellicosus belongs. We sequenced three mitochondrial and one nuclear marker for ten Phanaeini species: COI (672bp), COI-II (1326bp), 16S (527bp) and 28S (994bp). For fifteen species we sequenced two markers, COI (681pb) and 16S (532pb). Both matrices were analyzed under three methods of phylogenetic inference: Maximum Parsimony, Maximum Likelihood, and Bayesian Inference. Megaphanaeus is here considered monophyletic including C. bellicosus as sister-group to ( C. bonariensis ( C. lancifer + C. ensifer )). All analyses recovered the non-monophyly of both C. lancifer and C. ensifer , because of a population of C. lancifer grouped with C. ensifer specimens.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insect Systematics & Evolution\",\"volume\":\"-1 1\",\"pages\":\"241-255\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/1876312X-00002198\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insect Systematics & Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/1876312X-00002198\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insect Systematics & Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/1876312X-00002198","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Molecular Phylogeny of Coprophanaeus (Megaphanaeus) d’Olsoufieff, 1924 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) and the position of C. bellicosus
Coprophanaeus ( Megaphanaeus ) d’Olsoufieff, 1924 has four valid species: C. lancifer (Linne, 1767), C. ensifer (Germar, 1821), C. bonariensis (Gory, 1844) and C. bellicosus (Olivier, 1789). However, authors disagree about the placement of C. bellicosus . Thus, our aims were (I) to test if Megaphanaeus is a monophyletic group and (II) verify to which subgenus C. bellicosus belongs. We sequenced three mitochondrial and one nuclear marker for ten Phanaeini species: COI (672bp), COI-II (1326bp), 16S (527bp) and 28S (994bp). For fifteen species we sequenced two markers, COI (681pb) and 16S (532pb). Both matrices were analyzed under three methods of phylogenetic inference: Maximum Parsimony, Maximum Likelihood, and Bayesian Inference. Megaphanaeus is here considered monophyletic including C. bellicosus as sister-group to ( C. bonariensis ( C. lancifer + C. ensifer )). All analyses recovered the non-monophyly of both C. lancifer and C. ensifer , because of a population of C. lancifer grouped with C. ensifer specimens.
期刊介绍：
Insect Systematics & Evolution (ISE) publishes original papers on all aspects of systematic entomology and the evolutionary history of both extant and extinct insects and related groups. Priority is given to taxonomic revisions and phylogenetic studies employing morphological and molecular data. ISE also welcomes reviews and syntheses that can appeal to a wide community of systematic entomologists. Single species descriptions, regional checklists, and phylogenetic studies based on few taxa or single molecular markers will generally not be accepted.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
