葡萄牙的欧洲双国籍婚姻与欧盟社会融合

IF 0.2 Q3 Social Sciences Portuguese Journal of Social Science Pub Date : 2017-09-01 DOI:10.1386/PJSS.16.3.393_1
Sofia Gaspar, Ana Ferreira, Madalena Ramos
{"title":"葡萄牙的欧洲双国籍婚姻与欧盟社会融合","authors":"Sofia Gaspar, Ana Ferreira, Madalena Ramos","doi":"10.1386/PJSS.16.3.393_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some scholars have hypothesized that social integration in the European Union (EU) is a trigger for bi-national European marriages. Although this idea has been the motivation behind some research, empirical evidence shows that the effect of accession to the EU has had a limited effect on partner choice. This study aims to add to the knowledge on this issue by analysing the trends and patterns of marriages between Portuguese and non-Portuguese citizens between 1997 and 2011. We conducted bivariate and multivariate analyses using official data on marriages that took place in Portugal, with the results showing that bi-national European marriages remained stable throughout the period, although some nuances are evident depending on the type of marriage. While Portuguese-EU15 marriages declined over time, those between native Portuguese and other Europeans increased. Gender differences determined the development and composition of these marriages. This article also notes the existence of three distinct types of bi-national union: labour, recomposed and highly educated couples. The final part of the article seeks to explain and interpret the findings, specifically by focusing on the increase in cohabitation as a functional substitute for bi-national European marriage, the need to compare and combine the number of marriages in both spouses’ countries, and changes in the structure of the Portuguese matrimonial market due to the arrival of new social groups (e.g. Brazilian and Eastern European).","PeriodicalId":51963,"journal":{"name":"Portuguese Journal of Social Science","volume":"16 1","pages":"393-410"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"European bi-national marriages in Portugal and EU social integration\",\"authors\":\"Sofia Gaspar, Ana Ferreira, Madalena Ramos\",\"doi\":\"10.1386/PJSS.16.3.393_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Some scholars have hypothesized that social integration in the European Union (EU) is a trigger for bi-national European marriages. Although this idea has been the motivation behind some research, empirical evidence shows that the effect of accession to the EU has had a limited effect on partner choice. This study aims to add to the knowledge on this issue by analysing the trends and patterns of marriages between Portuguese and non-Portuguese citizens between 1997 and 2011. We conducted bivariate and multivariate analyses using official data on marriages that took place in Portugal, with the results showing that bi-national European marriages remained stable throughout the period, although some nuances are evident depending on the type of marriage. While Portuguese-EU15 marriages declined over time, those between native Portuguese and other Europeans increased. Gender differences determined the development and composition of these marriages. This article also notes the existence of three distinct types of bi-national union: labour, recomposed and highly educated couples. The final part of the article seeks to explain and interpret the findings, specifically by focusing on the increase in cohabitation as a functional substitute for bi-national European marriage, the need to compare and combine the number of marriages in both spouses’ countries, and changes in the structure of the Portuguese matrimonial market due to the arrival of new social groups (e.g. Brazilian and Eastern European).\",\"PeriodicalId\":51963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Portuguese Journal of Social Science\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"393-410\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Portuguese Journal of Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1386/PJSS.16.3.393_1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Portuguese Journal of Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/PJSS.16.3.393_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

一些学者假设,欧盟的社会融合是欧洲双国籍婚姻的导火索。尽管这一想法是一些研究背后的动机,但经验证据表明,加入欧盟对伙伴选择的影响有限。本研究旨在通过分析1997年至2011年间葡萄牙公民和非葡萄牙公民婚姻的趋势和模式,增加对这一问题的了解。我们使用葡萄牙婚姻的官方数据进行了双变量和多变量分析,结果显示,在这一时期,欧洲双国籍婚姻保持稳定,尽管根据婚姻类型的不同,一些细微差别是明显的。虽然葡萄牙与欧盟15国的婚姻随着时间的推移而减少,但葡萄牙本土与其他欧洲人之间的婚姻却有所增加。性别差异决定了这些婚姻的发展和组成。这篇文章还注意到存在三种不同类型的两国联盟:劳动、重组和受过高等教育的夫妇。文章的最后一部分试图解释和解释调查结果,特别是通过关注同居作为欧洲双国籍婚姻的功能替代品的增加,比较和合并配偶双方国家婚姻数量的必要性,以及由于新的社会群体(如巴西和东欧)的到来,葡萄牙婚姻市场结构发生了变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
European bi-national marriages in Portugal and EU social integration
Some scholars have hypothesized that social integration in the European Union (EU) is a trigger for bi-national European marriages. Although this idea has been the motivation behind some research, empirical evidence shows that the effect of accession to the EU has had a limited effect on partner choice. This study aims to add to the knowledge on this issue by analysing the trends and patterns of marriages between Portuguese and non-Portuguese citizens between 1997 and 2011. We conducted bivariate and multivariate analyses using official data on marriages that took place in Portugal, with the results showing that bi-national European marriages remained stable throughout the period, although some nuances are evident depending on the type of marriage. While Portuguese-EU15 marriages declined over time, those between native Portuguese and other Europeans increased. Gender differences determined the development and composition of these marriages. This article also notes the existence of three distinct types of bi-national union: labour, recomposed and highly educated couples. The final part of the article seeks to explain and interpret the findings, specifically by focusing on the increase in cohabitation as a functional substitute for bi-national European marriage, the need to compare and combine the number of marriages in both spouses’ countries, and changes in the structure of the Portuguese matrimonial market due to the arrival of new social groups (e.g. Brazilian and Eastern European).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Portuguese Journal of Social Science is a peer-reviewed cross-disciplinary journal focusing on research about Portuguese society by scholars of any nationality. However, the journal takes a broad view and accepts articles that are not exclusively devoted to the Portuguese case. We particularly welcome comparative studies. While the journal concentrates on research articles it operates a flexible policy in respect of other types of submission, including book reviews.
期刊最新文献
João Ferreira de Ameida (12 June 1941 – 16 June 2022) Ageing with a twist: Intimacy and care amongst LGB older adults in Portugal Gender (trans)formations in Europe and beyond: Trans lives and politics from a transnational perspective LGBTQI+ in democratic Portugal: An overview essay Somewhere under the rainbow: LGBTQ youth and school climate in Portugal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1