允许英国电力消费者选择供应商:值得吗?

IF 3.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC IEEE Power & Energy Magazine Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1109/MPE.2023.3269543
Steve Thomas
{"title":"允许英国电力消费者选择供应商:值得吗?","authors":"Steve Thomas","doi":"10.1109/MPE.2023.3269543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1990, britain was a pioneer of the package of measures for the electricity industry, variously described as privatization, liberalization, and marketization: in short, the British model. Britain has often been seen as the example other countries should follow. The vision of the proponents of this package of measures was that, in a competitive system, electricity could be bought and sold efficiently in the same way as other products, with no need for sector-specific regulations. However, 30 years later, this vision seems no nearer to being achieved. The current dominance in this sector of climate change considerations over economic efficiency means the market cannot be left alone to function. So, this vision will not be achieved in the short- to medium-term.","PeriodicalId":55020,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Power & Energy Magazine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Allowing British Electricity Consumers to Choose Their Supplier: Was it Worth It?\",\"authors\":\"Steve Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MPE.2023.3269543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1990, britain was a pioneer of the package of measures for the electricity industry, variously described as privatization, liberalization, and marketization: in short, the British model. Britain has often been seen as the example other countries should follow. The vision of the proponents of this package of measures was that, in a competitive system, electricity could be bought and sold efficiently in the same way as other products, with no need for sector-specific regulations. However, 30 years later, this vision seems no nearer to being achieved. The current dominance in this sector of climate change considerations over economic efficiency means the market cannot be left alone to function. So, this vision will not be achieved in the short- to medium-term.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Power & Energy Magazine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Power & Energy Magazine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MPE.2023.3269543\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Power & Energy Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MPE.2023.3269543","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1990年,英国率先对电力行业采取了一揽子措施,这些措施被称为私有化、自由化和市场化:简而言之,就是英国模式。英国经常被视为其他国家应该效仿的榜样。这一系列措施的支持者的愿景是,在一个竞争体系中,电力可以像其他产品一样有效地买卖,而不需要针对特定部门的规定。然而,30年后,这一愿景似乎没有接近实现。目前,气候变化方面的考虑凌驾于经济效率之上,这意味着不能让市场独自发挥作用。因此,这一愿景在短期到中期是无法实现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Allowing British Electricity Consumers to Choose Their Supplier: Was it Worth It?
In 1990, britain was a pioneer of the package of measures for the electricity industry, variously described as privatization, liberalization, and marketization: in short, the British model. Britain has often been seen as the example other countries should follow. The vision of the proponents of this package of measures was that, in a competitive system, electricity could be bought and sold efficiently in the same way as other products, with no need for sector-specific regulations. However, 30 years later, this vision seems no nearer to being achieved. The current dominance in this sector of climate change considerations over economic efficiency means the market cannot be left alone to function. So, this vision will not be achieved in the short- to medium-term.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Power & Energy Magazine
IEEE Power & Energy Magazine 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
145
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: IEEE Power & Energy Magazine is dedicated to disseminating information on all matters of interest to electric power engineers and other professionals involved in the electric power industry with a focus on advanced concepts, technologies, and practices associated with all aspects of electric power from a technical perspective in synergy with nontechnical areas such as business, environmental, and social concerns. IEEE Power & Energy Magazine keeps its readers up-to-date on the latest technological advancements, industry news, business trends and strategies, products, and publications. Important newsworthy items concerning the worldwide activities and achievements of IEEE Power & Energy Society (PES), its organizational units, and its individual members are also included.
期刊最新文献
Customer-Centric Electric Vehicle Orchestration in New Zealand: How Residential Smart Charging Can Deliver Affordability and Customer Satisfaction Utility Planning for Distribution-Optimized Electric Vehicle Charging: A Case Study in the United States Pacific Northwest A Grid-Friendly Electric Vehicle Infrastructure: The Korean Approach PES meetings: For more information, www.ieee-pes.org [Calendar] 2023 IEEE PES Awards: Accolades to the 2023 recipients [Awards]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1