{"title":"非刑事化之外:从相对透明到故意模糊的转变","authors":"Golan Luzon","doi":"10.1080/20508840.2019.1696082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article explores the phenomenon of decriminalisation. Although there is no comprehensive definition of decriminaliszation, common descriptions reduce it to cases in which a certain conduct no longer deserves to be criminalised. This article argues that decriminalisation is a broad phenomenon, which can be found in various places in criminal law, and should be examined from the perspective of the law in transition from relative transparency to deliberate ambiguity. To this end, I analyze several legal approaches: pure decriminalisation, de facto decriminalisation, de-prioritization, substitution, reclassification, and types of camouflaged decriminalisation (restorative justice and plea bargaining).","PeriodicalId":42455,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice of Legislation","volume":"7 1","pages":"47 - 65"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20508840.2019.1696082","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond decriminalization: the transition from relative transparency to deliberate ambiguity\",\"authors\":\"Golan Luzon\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20508840.2019.1696082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article explores the phenomenon of decriminalisation. Although there is no comprehensive definition of decriminaliszation, common descriptions reduce it to cases in which a certain conduct no longer deserves to be criminalised. This article argues that decriminalisation is a broad phenomenon, which can be found in various places in criminal law, and should be examined from the perspective of the law in transition from relative transparency to deliberate ambiguity. To this end, I analyze several legal approaches: pure decriminalisation, de facto decriminalisation, de-prioritization, substitution, reclassification, and types of camouflaged decriminalisation (restorative justice and plea bargaining).\",\"PeriodicalId\":42455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theory and Practice of Legislation\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"47 - 65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20508840.2019.1696082\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theory and Practice of Legislation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2019.1696082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice of Legislation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2019.1696082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
Beyond decriminalization: the transition from relative transparency to deliberate ambiguity
ABSTRACT This article explores the phenomenon of decriminalisation. Although there is no comprehensive definition of decriminaliszation, common descriptions reduce it to cases in which a certain conduct no longer deserves to be criminalised. This article argues that decriminalisation is a broad phenomenon, which can be found in various places in criminal law, and should be examined from the perspective of the law in transition from relative transparency to deliberate ambiguity. To this end, I analyze several legal approaches: pure decriminalisation, de facto decriminalisation, de-prioritization, substitution, reclassification, and types of camouflaged decriminalisation (restorative justice and plea bargaining).
期刊介绍:
The Theory and Practice of Legislation aims to offer an international and interdisciplinary forum for the examination of legislation. The focus of the journal, which succeeds the former title Legisprudence, remains with legislation in its broadest sense. Legislation is seen as both process and product, reflection of theoretical assumptions and a skill. The journal addresses formal legislation, and its alternatives (such as covenants, regulation by non-state actors etc.). The editors welcome articles on systematic (as opposed to historical) issues, including drafting techniques, the introduction of open standards, evidence-based drafting, pre- and post-legislative scrutiny for effectiveness and efficiency, the utility and necessity of codification, IT in legislation, the legitimacy of legislation in view of fundamental principles and rights, law and language, and the link between legislator and judge. Comparative and interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged. But dogmatic descriptions of positive law are outside the scope of the journal. The journal offers a combination of themed issues and general issues. All articles are submitted to double blind review.