事前交易结果与事后投资组合风险:以台湾证券商为例

IF 2 0 ECONOMICS Annals of Financial Economics Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.1142/s2010495220500128
Yong-Chin Liu, Hsiang-Ju Chen, W. Hsu
{"title":"事前交易结果与事后投资组合风险:以台湾证券商为例","authors":"Yong-Chin Liu, Hsiang-Ju Chen, W. Hsu","doi":"10.1142/s2010495220500128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines whether the investment behavior of securities dealers is consistent with the predictions of the house money and break-even effects. Using the stock portfolios, dealers hold in Taiwan from 1996 to 2013 as a sample, we test the relationship between trading gains/losses and subsequent changes in portfolio risk. The results show that only gains with low risks, not all gaining situations, cause subsequent risk preferences, and regardless of the size of the trading loss, there is not a significant change in subsequent risk. Controlling dealers’ characteristics, industry competition, and the stock market condition, the evidence shows that the house money effect on dealer behavior exists after earning low-risk profits and does not support the break-even effect. These results are qualitatively unchanged after robustness checks that primarily exclude dealer overconfidence effect and ensure that the risk-taking behavior under low risks results in a decrease in gains and thus not a rational behavior.","PeriodicalId":43570,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Financial Economics","volume":"15 1","pages":"2050012"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PRIOR TRADING OUTCOMES AND SUBSEQUENT PORTFOLIO RISKS: USING SECURITIES DEALER IN TAIWAN AS AN EXAMPLE\",\"authors\":\"Yong-Chin Liu, Hsiang-Ju Chen, W. Hsu\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/s2010495220500128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines whether the investment behavior of securities dealers is consistent with the predictions of the house money and break-even effects. Using the stock portfolios, dealers hold in Taiwan from 1996 to 2013 as a sample, we test the relationship between trading gains/losses and subsequent changes in portfolio risk. The results show that only gains with low risks, not all gaining situations, cause subsequent risk preferences, and regardless of the size of the trading loss, there is not a significant change in subsequent risk. Controlling dealers’ characteristics, industry competition, and the stock market condition, the evidence shows that the house money effect on dealer behavior exists after earning low-risk profits and does not support the break-even effect. These results are qualitatively unchanged after robustness checks that primarily exclude dealer overconfidence effect and ensure that the risk-taking behavior under low risks results in a decrease in gains and thus not a rational behavior.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Financial Economics\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"2050012\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Financial Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2010495220500128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Financial Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2010495220500128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察证券交易商的投资行为是否与房屋资金及盈亏平衡效应的预测一致。本研究以台湾证券商1996 - 2013年持有的股票组合为样本,检验交易损益与投资组合风险变动之间的关系。结果表明,只有低风险的收益,而不是所有的收益情况,才会引起后续风险偏好,并且无论交易损失的大小,后续风险都不会发生显著变化。在控制经销商特征、行业竞争和股票市场条件的情况下,证据表明,在获得低风险利润后,经销商行为存在房屋资金效应,不支持盈亏平衡效应。经过稳健性检验,这些结果在本质上没有变化。稳健性检验主要排除了交易商过度自信效应,并确保低风险下的冒险行为导致收益减少,因此不是理性行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PRIOR TRADING OUTCOMES AND SUBSEQUENT PORTFOLIO RISKS: USING SECURITIES DEALER IN TAIWAN AS AN EXAMPLE
This study examines whether the investment behavior of securities dealers is consistent with the predictions of the house money and break-even effects. Using the stock portfolios, dealers hold in Taiwan from 1996 to 2013 as a sample, we test the relationship between trading gains/losses and subsequent changes in portfolio risk. The results show that only gains with low risks, not all gaining situations, cause subsequent risk preferences, and regardless of the size of the trading loss, there is not a significant change in subsequent risk. Controlling dealers’ characteristics, industry competition, and the stock market condition, the evidence shows that the house money effect on dealer behavior exists after earning low-risk profits and does not support the break-even effect. These results are qualitatively unchanged after robustness checks that primarily exclude dealer overconfidence effect and ensure that the risk-taking behavior under low risks results in a decrease in gains and thus not a rational behavior.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
55.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
How Do Remittance Inflows Cause the Dutch Disease in the Financial Sector? The Role of Financial Risk and Human Capital Factors Affecting the Crude Oil Prices Volatility: A Case Study of the USA, China, Japan, Germany and India The Emerging Stock Markets and Their Asymmetric Response to Infectious Disease Equity Market Volatility (ID-EMV) Index Greenhouse Gas Emissions and the Rising Effects of Renewable Energy Consumption and Climate Risk Development Finance: Evidence from BRICS Countries Potential Welfare Gains from Optimal Macro Hedging for Oil Exporters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1