正畸治疗中影响牙合失败率的位置因素:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Orthodontic Waves Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.odw.2019.06.001
Ömer Hatipoğlu , Abdurahman Küçükönder , Ekrem Oral
{"title":"正畸治疗中影响牙合失败率的位置因素:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Ömer Hatipoğlu ,&nbsp;Abdurahman Küçükönder ,&nbsp;Ekrem Oral","doi":"10.1016/j.odw.2019.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to make a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies investigated the effects of positional factors on the bonding failure of brackets.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Electronic databases (PubMed, Web of science, Scopus) were searched by 3 independent researchers. Randomized studies comparing maxilla-mandibular region, anterior–posterior segments, and right-left arch were included in the meta-analysis. The odds ratio was used as the effect size. A two-tailed test was performed to compare the factors. Heterogeneity was calculated with the Cochran Q test and I<sup>2</sup> statistics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Association was found between bonding failure and dental regions (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.24, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.46) (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.009) and between bonding failure and anterior–posterior segments, too (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.96, 95% CI: 1.58, 2.45) (p<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). But, no association was found bonding failure and arch sides (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.11, 95% CI: 0.96, 1.29) (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.26).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Clinicians should more care, especially when operating in the mandibular region and posterior segment. However, there is no difference between the left and right arch in terms of the loss of the bracket.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43169,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontic Waves","volume":"78 3","pages":"Pages 93-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.odw.2019.06.001","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Positional factors affecting the bond failure rates in orthodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Ömer Hatipoğlu ,&nbsp;Abdurahman Küçükönder ,&nbsp;Ekrem Oral\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.odw.2019.06.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to make a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies investigated the effects of positional factors on the bonding failure of brackets.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Electronic databases (PubMed, Web of science, Scopus) were searched by 3 independent researchers. Randomized studies comparing maxilla-mandibular region, anterior–posterior segments, and right-left arch were included in the meta-analysis. The odds ratio was used as the effect size. A two-tailed test was performed to compare the factors. Heterogeneity was calculated with the Cochran Q test and I<sup>2</sup> statistics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Association was found between bonding failure and dental regions (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.24, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.46) (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.009) and between bonding failure and anterior–posterior segments, too (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.96, 95% CI: 1.58, 2.45) (p<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). But, no association was found bonding failure and arch sides (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.11, 95% CI: 0.96, 1.29) (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.26).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Clinicians should more care, especially when operating in the mandibular region and posterior segment. However, there is no difference between the left and right arch in terms of the loss of the bracket.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthodontic Waves\",\"volume\":\"78 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 93-101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.odw.2019.06.001\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthodontic Waves\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1344024119300044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontic Waves","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1344024119300044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的本研究的目的是系统回顾和荟萃分析研究的位置因素对托槽粘接失效的影响。方法3名独立研究者对PubMed、Web of science、Scopus等电子数据库进行检索。meta分析包括比较上颌区、前后节段和左右弓的随机研究。采用优势比作为效应量。采用双侧检验对各因素进行比较。采用Cochran Q检验和I2统计量计算异质性。结果粘接失败与牙区相关(OR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.46) (p = 0.009),粘接失败与前后牙段相关(OR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.58, 2.45) (p <0.001)。但是,未发现粘接失败与弓侧相关(OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.96, 1.29) (p = 0.26)。结论临床医生尤其在下颌骨及后段手术时应多加小心。然而,就支架的丢失而言,左右弓之间没有区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Positional factors affecting the bond failure rates in orthodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to make a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies investigated the effects of positional factors on the bonding failure of brackets.

Methods

Electronic databases (PubMed, Web of science, Scopus) were searched by 3 independent researchers. Randomized studies comparing maxilla-mandibular region, anterior–posterior segments, and right-left arch were included in the meta-analysis. The odds ratio was used as the effect size. A two-tailed test was performed to compare the factors. Heterogeneity was calculated with the Cochran Q test and I2 statistics.

Results

Association was found between bonding failure and dental regions (OR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.46) (p = 0.009) and between bonding failure and anterior–posterior segments, too (OR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.58, 2.45) (p < 0.001). But, no association was found bonding failure and arch sides (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.96, 1.29) (p = 0.26).

Conclusion

Clinicians should more care, especially when operating in the mandibular region and posterior segment. However, there is no difference between the left and right arch in terms of the loss of the bracket.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthodontic Waves
Orthodontic Waves DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Orthodontic Waves is the official publication of the Japanese Orthodontic Society. The aim of this journal is to foster the advancement of orthodontic research and practice. The journal seeks to publish original articles (i) definitive reports of wide interest to the orthodontic community, (ii) Case Reports and (iii) Short Communications. Research papers stand on the scientific basis of orthodontics. Clinical topics covered include all techniques and approaches to treatment planning. All submissions are subject to peer review.
期刊最新文献
Condylectomy as a treatment approach to condylar hyperplasia Effectiveness of a fluoride-releasing orthodontic primer in reducing demineralization around brackets – a systematic review Updates on periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics Incidence of impacted teeth requiring fenestration, traction, and orthodontic treatment in Japan Bond strength of orthodontic buttons on clear aligner materials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1