达达主义、新达达主义和劳森伯格

Q4 Arts and Humanities Art in Translation Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.1080/17561310.2021.1876727
Françoise Choay, Richard Elliott
{"title":"达达主义、新达达主义和劳森伯格","authors":"Françoise Choay, Richard Elliott","doi":"10.1080/17561310.2021.1876727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Written in response to Robert Rauschenberg’s first solo exhibition in Paris, this article describes some of the works on show and seeks to differentiate Rauschenberg’s work from that of Marcel Duchamp and Neo-Dada, and also from the production of the French Assemblage/Nouveau Réaliste artists. It predates Rauschenberg’s controversial success at the 1964 Venice Biennale, where he won the Grand Prize for the best foreign painting.","PeriodicalId":53629,"journal":{"name":"Art in Translation","volume":"12 1","pages":"293 - 301"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17561310.2021.1876727","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dada, Neo-Dada, and Rauschenberg\",\"authors\":\"Françoise Choay, Richard Elliott\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17561310.2021.1876727\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Written in response to Robert Rauschenberg’s first solo exhibition in Paris, this article describes some of the works on show and seeks to differentiate Rauschenberg’s work from that of Marcel Duchamp and Neo-Dada, and also from the production of the French Assemblage/Nouveau Réaliste artists. It predates Rauschenberg’s controversial success at the 1964 Venice Biennale, where he won the Grand Prize for the best foreign painting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Art in Translation\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"293 - 301\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17561310.2021.1876727\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Art in Translation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17561310.2021.1876727\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art in Translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17561310.2021.1876727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为对罗伯特·劳森伯格在巴黎的首次个展的回应,这篇文章描述了展出的一些作品,并试图将劳森伯格的作品与马塞尔·杜尚和新达达主义的作品区分开来,也与法国组装/新革命艺术家的作品区分开来。这要早于劳森伯格在1964年威尼斯双年展上备受争议的成功,在那里他获得了最佳外国绘画大奖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dada, Neo-Dada, and Rauschenberg
Abstract Written in response to Robert Rauschenberg’s first solo exhibition in Paris, this article describes some of the works on show and seeks to differentiate Rauschenberg’s work from that of Marcel Duchamp and Neo-Dada, and also from the production of the French Assemblage/Nouveau Réaliste artists. It predates Rauschenberg’s controversial success at the 1964 Venice Biennale, where he won the Grand Prize for the best foreign painting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Art in Translation
Art in Translation Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
The Prospects or the End of Neo-Dadaism The Black Flowers of Robert Mapplethorpe Roy Lichtenstein Imagination Put on Bread and Water Pollock Exhibition: A Myth Arrives from America
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1