慈善行业的盈余管理:加拿大研究

IF 0.5 Q4 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research Pub Date : 2023-04-20 DOI:10.29173/cjnser587
D. Cyr, S. Landry, Anne Fortin
{"title":"慈善行业的盈余管理:加拿大研究","authors":"D. Cyr, S. Landry, Anne Fortin","doi":"10.29173/cjnser587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines whether charitable organizations use discretionary accruals to manage their surplus or deficit. Linear regression was used to analyze the financial data of a broad sample of Canadian charitable organizations. Results showed that discretionary accruals were used to manage these income figures. This approach is compounded by the magnitude of grants, public benefit, and leverage. The results hold whether the charity anticipates a surplus or a deficit, but not if it displays a high level of public benefit. In that case, charities with an anticipated surplus increase their use of discretionary accruals to decrease earnings, whereas charities that anticipate a deficit are not inclined to manage their deficit toward zero. This study complements prior literature on nonprofits and shows that even though tax laws differ among countries, charity managers in various contexts are motivated to manage earnings and are influenced by various factors in doing so.","PeriodicalId":42673,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Earnings Management in the Charitable Sector: A Canadian Study\",\"authors\":\"D. Cyr, S. Landry, Anne Fortin\",\"doi\":\"10.29173/cjnser587\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines whether charitable organizations use discretionary accruals to manage their surplus or deficit. Linear regression was used to analyze the financial data of a broad sample of Canadian charitable organizations. Results showed that discretionary accruals were used to manage these income figures. This approach is compounded by the magnitude of grants, public benefit, and leverage. The results hold whether the charity anticipates a surplus or a deficit, but not if it displays a high level of public benefit. In that case, charities with an anticipated surplus increase their use of discretionary accruals to decrease earnings, whereas charities that anticipate a deficit are not inclined to manage their deficit toward zero. This study complements prior literature on nonprofits and shows that even though tax laws differ among countries, charity managers in various contexts are motivated to manage earnings and are influenced by various factors in doing so.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29173/cjnser587\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/cjnser587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了慈善组织是否使用可自由支配的应计项目来管理其盈余或赤字。线性回归用于分析加拿大慈善组织的广泛样本的财务数据。结果显示,可自由支配的应计项目被用来管理这些收入数字。拨款、公共利益和杠杆作用的大小使这种方法更加复杂。无论慈善机构预计会出现盈余还是赤字,结果都成立,但如果它表现出高水平的公共利益,则不成立。在这种情况下,预期盈余的慈善机构会增加使用可自由支配的应计项目来减少收入,而预期赤字的慈善机构则不倾向于将赤字控制在零。这项研究补充了先前关于非营利组织的文献,并表明尽管各国的税法不同,但不同背景下的慈善管理者都有动机管理收入,并在管理收入时受到各种因素的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Earnings Management in the Charitable Sector: A Canadian Study
This article examines whether charitable organizations use discretionary accruals to manage their surplus or deficit. Linear regression was used to analyze the financial data of a broad sample of Canadian charitable organizations. Results showed that discretionary accruals were used to manage these income figures. This approach is compounded by the magnitude of grants, public benefit, and leverage. The results hold whether the charity anticipates a surplus or a deficit, but not if it displays a high level of public benefit. In that case, charities with an anticipated surplus increase their use of discretionary accruals to decrease earnings, whereas charities that anticipate a deficit are not inclined to manage their deficit toward zero. This study complements prior literature on nonprofits and shows that even though tax laws differ among countries, charity managers in various contexts are motivated to manage earnings and are influenced by various factors in doing so.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
20
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Tipping Point for Advanced Capitalism: Class, Class Consciousness and Activism in the "Knowledge Economy" New Avenues for Public Value Management and the Role of Nonprofit Policy Innovation Labs: Co-Experience and Social Mediavation Labs, and Twitter The Limits of Nonprofit Sector Resilience: Evidence from Canadian Nonprofit Sector Surveys During the Pandemic Social Housing with Community Support in Québec: A Sociopolitical Perspective Les organismes d’habitation au Québec vivent la fin des ententes de subventions fédérales : une adaptabilité sans renouvellement ?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1