真正的解释与强极简主义命题

IF 0.5 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Cognitive Semantics Pub Date : 2023-01-25 DOI:10.1163/23526416-bja10040
Noam Chomsky
{"title":"真正的解释与强极简主义命题","authors":"Noam Chomsky","doi":"10.1163/23526416-bja10040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe goal of theoretical inquiry is explanation: Why this, and not that? In the study of language, search for explanatory theory proceeds at two levels: for individual languages (a generative grammar in the broad sense) and for the general faculty of language fl (ug), the latter apparently a true species property, common to humans and without significant analogue in the animal world. ug must meet several conditions: learnability, evolvability, coverage. These conditions appear to conflict, and are far more severe than had earlier been supposed. A solution to the conundrum would be satisfaction of smt for ug combined with recourse to language-independent principles of computational efficiency, with diversity sequestered in components of language subject to simple algorithmic search. For the first time, hopes for such an outcome seem to be on the horizon, with significant implications if the hopes can be realized. I will outline some current work on these topics.","PeriodicalId":52227,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Semantics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genuine Explanation and the Strong Minimalist Thesis\",\"authors\":\"Noam Chomsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/23526416-bja10040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThe goal of theoretical inquiry is explanation: Why this, and not that? In the study of language, search for explanatory theory proceeds at two levels: for individual languages (a generative grammar in the broad sense) and for the general faculty of language fl (ug), the latter apparently a true species property, common to humans and without significant analogue in the animal world. ug must meet several conditions: learnability, evolvability, coverage. These conditions appear to conflict, and are far more severe than had earlier been supposed. A solution to the conundrum would be satisfaction of smt for ug combined with recourse to language-independent principles of computational efficiency, with diversity sequestered in components of language subject to simple algorithmic search. For the first time, hopes for such an outcome seem to be on the horizon, with significant implications if the hopes can be realized. I will outline some current work on these topics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Semantics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Semantics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/23526416-bja10040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Semantics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/23526416-bja10040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

理论探究的目标是解释:为什么是这个,而不是那个?在语言研究中,对解释性理论的探索在两个层面上进行:个体语言(广义上的生成语法)和语言的一般能力(ug),后者显然是真正的物种属性,人类共有,在动物世界中没有明显的相似之处。Ug必须满足几个条件:易学性、可进化性、覆盖范围。这些条件似乎是相互冲突的,而且远比先前设想的要严重得多。解决这个难题的一个办法是满足ug的smt,并结合使用与语言无关的计算效率原则,将多样性隔离在受简单算法搜索约束的语言组件中。这是第一次出现对这种结果的希望,如果这种希望能够实现,将产生重大影响。我将概述当前在这些主题上的一些工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Genuine Explanation and the Strong Minimalist Thesis
The goal of theoretical inquiry is explanation: Why this, and not that? In the study of language, search for explanatory theory proceeds at two levels: for individual languages (a generative grammar in the broad sense) and for the general faculty of language fl (ug), the latter apparently a true species property, common to humans and without significant analogue in the animal world. ug must meet several conditions: learnability, evolvability, coverage. These conditions appear to conflict, and are far more severe than had earlier been supposed. A solution to the conundrum would be satisfaction of smt for ug combined with recourse to language-independent principles of computational efficiency, with diversity sequestered in components of language subject to simple algorithmic search. For the first time, hopes for such an outcome seem to be on the horizon, with significant implications if the hopes can be realized. I will outline some current work on these topics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Semantics
Cognitive Semantics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Overhauling Collostructional Analysis: Towards More Descriptive Simplicity and More Explanatory Adequacy Radial Representations of the Semantics of Reduplicative Constructions in Nigerian Pidgin (Naija) Words of Wonder: The Cognitive and Semantic Dimension of the Literal and Figurative Denominators for wonder in Old English Sources Inconsistency in Conceptual Metaphor Theory Speakers’ Gestures and Semantic Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1