Kaare Aagaard, S. Haase, David Mayntz
{"title":"Institutionalisering af ansvarlig forskningspraksis i professionshøjskole­ sektoren","authors":"Kaare Aagaard, S. Haase, David Mayntz","doi":"10.7146/tfp.v17i33.129166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the latest decade ‘research integrity’ has become a major theme on the Danish research policy agenda. However, the national initiatives are broad and abstract and require specific organizational translations. Hence, in this study we ask how the university college sector has responded to the increasing political demands of organizational research integrity policies based on a theoretical framework focusing on organizational translation. The framework highlights that policies seldom are implemented straightforward in classical top down processes, but rather are translated and adjusted selectively to specific organizational contexts in complex and dynamic processes. In an empirical analysis of two selected Danish university colleges we then show that the implementation processes not only have required years of preparation but also have unfolded quite differently across the two organizations. Overall, we find that elements related to explicit requirements and risks of sanctions appear to have been prioritized over more culture-oriented efforts. Based on these findings we discuss challenges and dilemmas in coping with research integrity within the university college sector and round off by highlighting future potentials related to the broader ‘Responsible research and innovation’ agenda.","PeriodicalId":32373,"journal":{"name":"Tidsskrift for Professionsstudier","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tidsskrift for Professionsstudier","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/tfp.v17i33.129166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在最近的十年里,“研究诚信”已成为丹麦研究政策议程上的一个主要主题。然而,国家举措是宽泛和抽象的,需要具体的组织翻译。因此,在本研究中,我们询问大学学院部门如何在专注于组织翻译的理论框架下应对组织研究诚信政策日益增长的政治需求。该框架强调,在传统的自上而下的过程中,政策很少直接实施,而是在复杂和动态的过程中根据具体的组织背景进行选择性的翻译和调整。在对两所选定的丹麦大学学院的实证分析中,我们发现实施过程不仅需要多年的准备,而且在这两个组织中的表现也截然不同。总的来说,我们发现,与明确要求和制裁风险有关的要素似乎优先于更注重文化的努力。基于这些发现,我们讨论了大学学院部门在应对研究诚信方面的挑战和困境,并通过强调与更广泛的“负责任的研究和创新”议程相关的未来潜力来进行总结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Institutionalisering af ansvarlig forskningspraksis i professionshøjskole­ sektoren
Over the latest decade ‘research integrity’ has become a major theme on the Danish research policy agenda. However, the national initiatives are broad and abstract and require specific organizational translations. Hence, in this study we ask how the university college sector has responded to the increasing political demands of organizational research integrity policies based on a theoretical framework focusing on organizational translation. The framework highlights that policies seldom are implemented straightforward in classical top down processes, but rather are translated and adjusted selectively to specific organizational contexts in complex and dynamic processes. In an empirical analysis of two selected Danish university colleges we then show that the implementation processes not only have required years of preparation but also have unfolded quite differently across the two organizations. Overall, we find that elements related to explicit requirements and risks of sanctions appear to have been prioritized over more culture-oriented efforts. Based on these findings we discuss challenges and dilemmas in coping with research integrity within the university college sector and round off by highlighting future potentials related to the broader ‘Responsible research and innovation’ agenda.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Lege- og børnekulturer i praksis Professionsidentitet blandt ergoterapeutstuderende Janne Østergaard Hagelquist: Mentalisering i mødet med udsatte børn Sanne Faber, Andreas Kopp og Kirsten Lauta: Det meningsfulde historiefag Frivilliges samarbejde med medarbejdere i kirken - med hvilket engagement?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1