出院教育计划对韩国家庭护理人员照顾家庭机械通气患者的影响:一项试点试验

H. Kim, Gwang Suk Kim, Hyangkyu Lee, Jiyeon Choi, Y. S. Kim, E. Oh
{"title":"出院教育计划对韩国家庭护理人员照顾家庭机械通气患者的影响:一项试点试验","authors":"H. Kim, Gwang Suk Kim, Hyangkyu Lee, Jiyeon Choi, Y. S. Kim, E. Oh","doi":"10.1177/10848223221096344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patients on home ventilators rely on mechanical ventilation until their death; hence, family caregivers should perform additional caregiving, including tracheostomy, equipment management, and positive pressure ventilation by ambu-bag in emergencies. Therefore, a systematic discharge education program and evaluation of actual caregiver performance are necessary for safe home management. The program consists of suction and tracheostomy management, home ventilator management, emergency management, fundamental caregiving, and video material. To test clinical validity, family caregivers of patients about to be discharged to their homes from S hospital in Seoul, Korea, were selected by convenience sampling with a non-equivalent control group design. Of 18 participants, one refused, one died, and two became unstable after their agreement; therefore, 14 participants were finally included. To compare caregiving performance scores between the groups, we ran repeated measures ANOVA. Intergroup and period interaction of suction (F = 6.08, p = .001) and tracheostomy management (F = 3.00, p = .038) crucial for airway management, showed significant statistical differences. In short, the intervention group showed a faster increase in suction and tracheostomy management than the control group. Home ventilator management (F = 22.53, p < .001), emergency management (F = 12.01, p < .001), and fundamental caregiving (F = 7.88, p < .001) showed significant differences within the group regarding the period. According to the results of the clinical validity test, the discharge education program increased the family caregiver’s suction and tracheostomy management performance scores. Further research is needed to demonstrate long-term effects of the program with a larger sample.","PeriodicalId":45762,"journal":{"name":"Home Health Care Management and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of the Discharge Education Program on Family Caregivers Caring for Patients on Mechanical Home Ventilation in Korea: A Pilot Test\",\"authors\":\"H. Kim, Gwang Suk Kim, Hyangkyu Lee, Jiyeon Choi, Y. S. Kim, E. Oh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10848223221096344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Patients on home ventilators rely on mechanical ventilation until their death; hence, family caregivers should perform additional caregiving, including tracheostomy, equipment management, and positive pressure ventilation by ambu-bag in emergencies. Therefore, a systematic discharge education program and evaluation of actual caregiver performance are necessary for safe home management. The program consists of suction and tracheostomy management, home ventilator management, emergency management, fundamental caregiving, and video material. To test clinical validity, family caregivers of patients about to be discharged to their homes from S hospital in Seoul, Korea, were selected by convenience sampling with a non-equivalent control group design. Of 18 participants, one refused, one died, and two became unstable after their agreement; therefore, 14 participants were finally included. To compare caregiving performance scores between the groups, we ran repeated measures ANOVA. Intergroup and period interaction of suction (F = 6.08, p = .001) and tracheostomy management (F = 3.00, p = .038) crucial for airway management, showed significant statistical differences. In short, the intervention group showed a faster increase in suction and tracheostomy management than the control group. Home ventilator management (F = 22.53, p < .001), emergency management (F = 12.01, p < .001), and fundamental caregiving (F = 7.88, p < .001) showed significant differences within the group regarding the period. According to the results of the clinical validity test, the discharge education program increased the family caregiver’s suction and tracheostomy management performance scores. Further research is needed to demonstrate long-term effects of the program with a larger sample.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Home Health Care Management and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Home Health Care Management and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10848223221096344\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Home Health Care Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10848223221096344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

使用家用呼吸机的患者依赖机械通气直到死亡;因此,家庭护理人员应进行额外的护理,包括气管造口术、设备管理和紧急情况下使用ambu袋进行正压通气。因此,系统的出院教育计划和对实际护理人员表现的评估对于安全家庭管理是必要的。该项目包括抽吸和气管造口术管理、家庭呼吸机管理、应急管理、基本护理和视频材料。为了检验临床有效性,采用非等效对照组设计,通过方便抽样的方式选择了韩国首尔S医院即将出院的患者的家庭护理人员。在18名参与者中,一人拒绝,一人死亡,两人在达成协议后变得不稳定;因此,最终纳入了14名参与者。为了比较两组之间的护理表现得分,我们进行了重复测量ANOVA。吸力的组间和周期相互作用(F = 6.08,p = .001)和气管造口术管理(F = 3.00,p = .038)显示出显著的统计学差异。简言之,干预组在抽吸和气管造口术管理方面比对照组增加得更快。家用呼吸机管理(F = 22.53,p < .001),应急管理(F = 12.01,第页 < .001)和基本护理(F = 7.88,p < .001)显示出组内关于该时期的显著差异。根据临床有效性测试的结果,出院教育计划提高了家庭护理人员的抽吸和气管造口术管理绩效得分。还需要进一步的研究来用更大的样本来证明该计划的长期效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of the Discharge Education Program on Family Caregivers Caring for Patients on Mechanical Home Ventilation in Korea: A Pilot Test
Patients on home ventilators rely on mechanical ventilation until their death; hence, family caregivers should perform additional caregiving, including tracheostomy, equipment management, and positive pressure ventilation by ambu-bag in emergencies. Therefore, a systematic discharge education program and evaluation of actual caregiver performance are necessary for safe home management. The program consists of suction and tracheostomy management, home ventilator management, emergency management, fundamental caregiving, and video material. To test clinical validity, family caregivers of patients about to be discharged to their homes from S hospital in Seoul, Korea, were selected by convenience sampling with a non-equivalent control group design. Of 18 participants, one refused, one died, and two became unstable after their agreement; therefore, 14 participants were finally included. To compare caregiving performance scores between the groups, we ran repeated measures ANOVA. Intergroup and period interaction of suction (F = 6.08, p = .001) and tracheostomy management (F = 3.00, p = .038) crucial for airway management, showed significant statistical differences. In short, the intervention group showed a faster increase in suction and tracheostomy management than the control group. Home ventilator management (F = 22.53, p < .001), emergency management (F = 12.01, p < .001), and fundamental caregiving (F = 7.88, p < .001) showed significant differences within the group regarding the period. According to the results of the clinical validity test, the discharge education program increased the family caregiver’s suction and tracheostomy management performance scores. Further research is needed to demonstrate long-term effects of the program with a larger sample.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Home Health Care Management & Practice is a comprehensive resource for clinicians, case managers, and administrators providing home and community based health care. Articles address diverse issues, ranging from individual patient care and case management to the human resource management and organizational operations management and administration of organizations and agencies. Regular columns focus on research, legal issues, psychosocial perspectives, accreditation and licensing, compliance, management, and cultural diversity. Specific topics include treatment, care and therapeutic techniques, cultural competence, family caregivers, equipment management, human resources, home health center.
期刊最新文献
Inter-Organizational Home Care Nursing Teams: A Comparison of a Region Wide Organizational Change Initiative With Success Factors Identified by Forerunners and Team Theory Is Palliative Care Cost-Effective? A Systematic Review of the Literature “They Are Lost Souls”: Medicare Home Care Nurses’ Perceptions of Medicare’s Inadequate Coverage of Homebound Persons With Alzheimer’s Disease An Online, Self-Report Version of the Home Falls and Accidents Screening Tool (HOME FAST-SR) to Identify Fall-Related Hazards in the Homes of Older People The Effect on Home Caregivers of a Family Support Program Based on a Nurse-Led Case Management Model: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1