{"title":"大学生阅读自我效能感来源量表(SOURSES‐C)的编制和初步验证","authors":"Yalian Pei, Katy H. O'Brien","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>To examine levels of reading self-efficacy in college students and further understand sources that foster reading self-efficacy at the postsecondary level, there is a need for a valid scale that can be used for college student populations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In Phase 1, 160 items were generated and reviewed by a panel of experts and a group of undergraduate students. Of these, 48 items reached consensus for acceptance and were retained for Phase 2 pilot testing. Pilot results were analysed with principal component analysis to identify the scale structure and remove items not strongly associated with components. Phase 3 finalised the scale and confirmed construct validity using confirmatory factor analysis as well as internal reliability with Cronbach's α. Phase 4 further assessed construct validity through sensitivity analyses that control for age, gender, education level, ethnicity and grade point average (GPA) to evaluate the potential impact of these covariates on model fit. In addition, Phase 4 assessed the relationships between reading self-efficacy and similar constructs (i.e., academic self-efficacy and reading performance) to evaluate convergent validity of the final scale.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Based on Phase 2 principal component analysis, three components were retained: ‘effort’, ‘enjoyment’, and ‘processing’. After removing items with high covariance indicated by the Phase 3 testing, the final scale included 15 items. The Sources of Reading Self-Efficacy Scale for College and University Students (SOURSES-C) was significantly correlated with reading performance, GPA and general academic self-efficacy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>SOURSES-C is a valid and reliable tool to describe sources of reading self-efficacy in college students. Understanding of reading self-efficacy profiles may inform further investigations to improve motivation and persistence, self-regulation and strategy use during reading.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Reading","volume":"46 3","pages":"225-246"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and initial validation of the Sources of Reading Self-Efficacy Scale for College and University Students (SOURSES-C)\",\"authors\":\"Yalian Pei, Katy H. O'Brien\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-9817.12422\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>To examine levels of reading self-efficacy in college students and further understand sources that foster reading self-efficacy at the postsecondary level, there is a need for a valid scale that can be used for college student populations.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>In Phase 1, 160 items were generated and reviewed by a panel of experts and a group of undergraduate students. Of these, 48 items reached consensus for acceptance and were retained for Phase 2 pilot testing. Pilot results were analysed with principal component analysis to identify the scale structure and remove items not strongly associated with components. Phase 3 finalised the scale and confirmed construct validity using confirmatory factor analysis as well as internal reliability with Cronbach's α. Phase 4 further assessed construct validity through sensitivity analyses that control for age, gender, education level, ethnicity and grade point average (GPA) to evaluate the potential impact of these covariates on model fit. In addition, Phase 4 assessed the relationships between reading self-efficacy and similar constructs (i.e., academic self-efficacy and reading performance) to evaluate convergent validity of the final scale.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Based on Phase 2 principal component analysis, three components were retained: ‘effort’, ‘enjoyment’, and ‘processing’. After removing items with high covariance indicated by the Phase 3 testing, the final scale included 15 items. The Sources of Reading Self-Efficacy Scale for College and University Students (SOURSES-C) was significantly correlated with reading performance, GPA and general academic self-efficacy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>SOURSES-C is a valid and reliable tool to describe sources of reading self-efficacy in college students. Understanding of reading self-efficacy profiles may inform further investigations to improve motivation and persistence, self-regulation and strategy use during reading.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Reading\",\"volume\":\"46 3\",\"pages\":\"225-246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Reading\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9817.12422\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Reading","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9817.12422","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development and initial validation of the Sources of Reading Self-Efficacy Scale for College and University Students (SOURSES-C)
Background
To examine levels of reading self-efficacy in college students and further understand sources that foster reading self-efficacy at the postsecondary level, there is a need for a valid scale that can be used for college student populations.
Methods
In Phase 1, 160 items were generated and reviewed by a panel of experts and a group of undergraduate students. Of these, 48 items reached consensus for acceptance and were retained for Phase 2 pilot testing. Pilot results were analysed with principal component analysis to identify the scale structure and remove items not strongly associated with components. Phase 3 finalised the scale and confirmed construct validity using confirmatory factor analysis as well as internal reliability with Cronbach's α. Phase 4 further assessed construct validity through sensitivity analyses that control for age, gender, education level, ethnicity and grade point average (GPA) to evaluate the potential impact of these covariates on model fit. In addition, Phase 4 assessed the relationships between reading self-efficacy and similar constructs (i.e., academic self-efficacy and reading performance) to evaluate convergent validity of the final scale.
Results
Based on Phase 2 principal component analysis, three components were retained: ‘effort’, ‘enjoyment’, and ‘processing’. After removing items with high covariance indicated by the Phase 3 testing, the final scale included 15 items. The Sources of Reading Self-Efficacy Scale for College and University Students (SOURSES-C) was significantly correlated with reading performance, GPA and general academic self-efficacy.
Conclusions
SOURSES-C is a valid and reliable tool to describe sources of reading self-efficacy in college students. Understanding of reading self-efficacy profiles may inform further investigations to improve motivation and persistence, self-regulation and strategy use during reading.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Research in Reading provides an international forum for researchers into literacy. It is a refereed journal, principally devoted to reports of empirical studies in reading and related fields, and to informed reviews of relevant literature. The journal welcomes papers researching issues related to the learning, teaching and use of literacy in a variety of contexts; papers on the history and development of literacy; papers about policy and strategy for literacy as related to children and adults. Journal of Research in Reading encourages papers within any research paradigm and from researchers in any relevant field such as anthropology, cultural studies, education, history of education, language and linguistics, philosophy, psychology and sociology.