{"title":"内镜联合手术改良俯卧劈腿位治疗复杂肾结石伴同侧输尿管结石的临床应用","authors":"Daming Wang, Dexin Yu, Dongdong Xie, Demao Ding, Lei Chen, Zhi-qiang Zhang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6702.2019.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the feasibility and safety of endoscopic combined simultaneous surgery in the modified prone split-leg position for complex renal calculi with ipsilateral ureteral calculi. \n \n \nMethods \nThe clinical data of 56 cases patients with simultaneous renal and ureteral stones admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 2016 to March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. A retrospective analysis was performed on 56 cases of patients with simultaneous renal and ureteral stones who received surgical treatment between January 2016 and March 2019. According to different surgical methods, 56 cases were divided into the modified prone split-leg position group (observation group) and the traditional pre-lithotomy position followed by prone position group (control group). In observation group, the average age of 11 males and 17 females was (54.1±10.2)years. The mean body mass index was (23.8±2.9) kg/m2. The location of stones were left in 14 cases and right in 14 cases. The average kidney involvement calyces number was 2.4±0.7.The mean kidney stones maximum cross-sectional area was (870.9±157.7)m2. According to the Guy′s classification system, there were 3 cases of grade Ⅰ, 11 case of grade Ⅱ and 14 case of grade Ⅲ in the observation group. The kidney stones S. T.O.N.E scores was 8.7±1.3 and ureteral calculi S. T.O.N.E scores were 13.1± 1.6.In the control group, the average age was (57.0±8.3)years old. The mean body mass index was (24.4±2.9)kg/m2. The average kidney involvement calyces number was 2.1±0.7 and the mean kidney stones maximum cross-sectional area was (808.8±189.6)mm2. To the kidney stones Guy′s classification, there were 5 cases of grade Ⅰ, 15 case of grade Ⅱ, 7 case of grade Ⅲ and 1case of grade Ⅳ in the control group. The kidney stones S. T.O.N.E scores were 8.5±0.6 and the ureteral calculi S. T.O.N.E scores were 12.4±1.7. The operation time, calculus clearance rate, postoperative hospitalization days, reoperation rate and severity of complications of Clavien-Dindo were statistically compared between the two groups. \n \n \nResults \nThe study found that the average operation time in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group [(77.8±27.3)min vs.(94.4±22.8)min](P 0.05). In observation group, one case accepted the DSA embolization therapy due to the severe bleeding. One case accepted the puncture drainage due to the perinephric effusion. There was no difference in average postoperative hospital stay between the two groups [(6.5±1.2)d vs.(7.0±2.1)d, P>0.05]. \n \n \nConclusions \nIt is safe and feasible to treat complex renal calculi with ipsilateral ureteral calculi by endoscopic combined simultaneous surgery in the modified prone split-leg position. One position can solve many problems simultaneously, which can significantly reduce the operation time, increase the stone free rates, reduce the reoperation rate and improve the effectiveness of the operation. \n \n \nKey words: \nKidney calculi; Prone split-leg position; Endoscopic combined surgery; Complex","PeriodicalId":10343,"journal":{"name":"中华泌尿外科杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical application of endoscopic combined simultaneous surgery in the modified prone split-leg position for complex renal calculi with ipsilateral ureteral calculi\",\"authors\":\"Daming Wang, Dexin Yu, Dongdong Xie, Demao Ding, Lei Chen, Zhi-qiang Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6702.2019.09.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo investigate the feasibility and safety of endoscopic combined simultaneous surgery in the modified prone split-leg position for complex renal calculi with ipsilateral ureteral calculi. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nThe clinical data of 56 cases patients with simultaneous renal and ureteral stones admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 2016 to March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. A retrospective analysis was performed on 56 cases of patients with simultaneous renal and ureteral stones who received surgical treatment between January 2016 and March 2019. According to different surgical methods, 56 cases were divided into the modified prone split-leg position group (observation group) and the traditional pre-lithotomy position followed by prone position group (control group). In observation group, the average age of 11 males and 17 females was (54.1±10.2)years. The mean body mass index was (23.8±2.9) kg/m2. The location of stones were left in 14 cases and right in 14 cases. The average kidney involvement calyces number was 2.4±0.7.The mean kidney stones maximum cross-sectional area was (870.9±157.7)m2. According to the Guy′s classification system, there were 3 cases of grade Ⅰ, 11 case of grade Ⅱ and 14 case of grade Ⅲ in the observation group. The kidney stones S. T.O.N.E scores was 8.7±1.3 and ureteral calculi S. T.O.N.E scores were 13.1± 1.6.In the control group, the average age was (57.0±8.3)years old. The mean body mass index was (24.4±2.9)kg/m2. The average kidney involvement calyces number was 2.1±0.7 and the mean kidney stones maximum cross-sectional area was (808.8±189.6)mm2. To the kidney stones Guy′s classification, there were 5 cases of grade Ⅰ, 15 case of grade Ⅱ, 7 case of grade Ⅲ and 1case of grade Ⅳ in the control group. The kidney stones S. T.O.N.E scores were 8.5±0.6 and the ureteral calculi S. T.O.N.E scores were 12.4±1.7. The operation time, calculus clearance rate, postoperative hospitalization days, reoperation rate and severity of complications of Clavien-Dindo were statistically compared between the two groups. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThe study found that the average operation time in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group [(77.8±27.3)min vs.(94.4±22.8)min](P 0.05). In observation group, one case accepted the DSA embolization therapy due to the severe bleeding. One case accepted the puncture drainage due to the perinephric effusion. There was no difference in average postoperative hospital stay between the two groups [(6.5±1.2)d vs.(7.0±2.1)d, P>0.05]. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nIt is safe and feasible to treat complex renal calculi with ipsilateral ureteral calculi by endoscopic combined simultaneous surgery in the modified prone split-leg position. One position can solve many problems simultaneously, which can significantly reduce the operation time, increase the stone free rates, reduce the reoperation rate and improve the effectiveness of the operation. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nKidney calculi; Prone split-leg position; Endoscopic combined surgery; Complex\",\"PeriodicalId\":10343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华泌尿外科杂志\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华泌尿外科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6702.2019.09.009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华泌尿外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6702.2019.09.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical application of endoscopic combined simultaneous surgery in the modified prone split-leg position for complex renal calculi with ipsilateral ureteral calculi
Objective
To investigate the feasibility and safety of endoscopic combined simultaneous surgery in the modified prone split-leg position for complex renal calculi with ipsilateral ureteral calculi.
Methods
The clinical data of 56 cases patients with simultaneous renal and ureteral stones admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 2016 to March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. A retrospective analysis was performed on 56 cases of patients with simultaneous renal and ureteral stones who received surgical treatment between January 2016 and March 2019. According to different surgical methods, 56 cases were divided into the modified prone split-leg position group (observation group) and the traditional pre-lithotomy position followed by prone position group (control group). In observation group, the average age of 11 males and 17 females was (54.1±10.2)years. The mean body mass index was (23.8±2.9) kg/m2. The location of stones were left in 14 cases and right in 14 cases. The average kidney involvement calyces number was 2.4±0.7.The mean kidney stones maximum cross-sectional area was (870.9±157.7)m2. According to the Guy′s classification system, there were 3 cases of grade Ⅰ, 11 case of grade Ⅱ and 14 case of grade Ⅲ in the observation group. The kidney stones S. T.O.N.E scores was 8.7±1.3 and ureteral calculi S. T.O.N.E scores were 13.1± 1.6.In the control group, the average age was (57.0±8.3)years old. The mean body mass index was (24.4±2.9)kg/m2. The average kidney involvement calyces number was 2.1±0.7 and the mean kidney stones maximum cross-sectional area was (808.8±189.6)mm2. To the kidney stones Guy′s classification, there were 5 cases of grade Ⅰ, 15 case of grade Ⅱ, 7 case of grade Ⅲ and 1case of grade Ⅳ in the control group. The kidney stones S. T.O.N.E scores were 8.5±0.6 and the ureteral calculi S. T.O.N.E scores were 12.4±1.7. The operation time, calculus clearance rate, postoperative hospitalization days, reoperation rate and severity of complications of Clavien-Dindo were statistically compared between the two groups.
Results
The study found that the average operation time in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group [(77.8±27.3)min vs.(94.4±22.8)min](P 0.05). In observation group, one case accepted the DSA embolization therapy due to the severe bleeding. One case accepted the puncture drainage due to the perinephric effusion. There was no difference in average postoperative hospital stay between the two groups [(6.5±1.2)d vs.(7.0±2.1)d, P>0.05].
Conclusions
It is safe and feasible to treat complex renal calculi with ipsilateral ureteral calculi by endoscopic combined simultaneous surgery in the modified prone split-leg position. One position can solve many problems simultaneously, which can significantly reduce the operation time, increase the stone free rates, reduce the reoperation rate and improve the effectiveness of the operation.
Key words:
Kidney calculi; Prone split-leg position; Endoscopic combined surgery; Complex
期刊介绍:
Chinese Journal of Urology (monthly) was founded in 1980. It is a publicly issued academic journal supervised by the China Association for Science and Technology and sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association. It mainly publishes original research papers, reviews and comments in this field. This journal mainly reports on the latest scientific research results and clinical diagnosis and treatment experience in the professional field of urology at home and abroad, as well as basic theoretical research results closely related to clinical practice.
The journal has columns such as treatises, abstracts of treatises, experimental studies, case reports, experience exchanges, reviews, reviews, lectures, etc.
Chinese Journal of Urology has been included in well-known databases such as Peking University Journal (Chinese Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences), CSCD Chinese Science Citation Database Source Journal (including extended version), and also included in American Chemical Abstracts (CA). The journal has been rated as a quality journal by the Association for Science and Technology and as an excellent journal by the Chinese Medical Association.