社论

Q2 Social Sciences Evaluation Journal of Australasia Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI:10.1177/1035719X21990117
Bronwyn Rossingh
{"title":"社论","authors":"Bronwyn Rossingh","doi":"10.1177/1035719X21990117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Welcome to the first issue of the EJA for 2021. The EJA like any business or organisation is in a cycle of continuous improvement with a keen focus on developing strategies and opportunities to increase the number of submissions. We endeavour to inspire and attract articles of professional merit on any subject connected with evaluation including information of professional interest. The EJA aims to position itself as a quality journal that enjoys a growing national and international readership to ensure that the practice and theory of evaluation continue to be stimulated, expanded and strengthened while providing a platform of professional learning. This March 2021 issue encapsulates a representation of the work, history and thinking of a diverse range of evaluators who demonstrate and bring to life exactly what the EJA strives to achieve in keeping with its vision and purpose. A further platform of professional development and learning is the annual International Evaluation Conference conducted by the Australian Evaluation Society (AES) to be held in late September this year in Brisbane. The theme for the 2021 conference is Through the Lens. This theme invites prospective attendees to consider the way we reflect on the wisdom of our elders; to refract our knowledge and learning in ways that enable us to embrace diversity in our communities: as well as to refocus on the future and create shared visions that resonate. This issue provides an early introduction to some of the subthemes of the conference by offering an alternative thinking under the Refract subtheme to continually evolve and diversify our evaluative thinking and practice to be relevant. These articles also do justice to the Refocus subtheme to push the boundaries, practising on the edge and therefore expanding and strengthening knowledge within the evaluation field. It is hoped that these articles will inspire readers to submit their own articles to the EJA as early preparation for conference presentations. The peer-reviewing process supports authors to improve their submissions for eventual publication. In this issue, we have three very unique articles offering different ways of thinking in the evaluation field as the authors seek to strengthen and inform evaluation theory and practice by extending evaluative thinking through tools and knowledge sharing. In the first article for this issue, John Guenther and Ian Falk formulate a model to enable an approach to generalise from qualitative evaluation (GQE). The article titled ‘Generalising from qualitative evaluation’ commences with discussion of the definitions of generalisability in a research context, then seeks to find the differentiation 990117 EVJ0010.1177/1035719X21990117Evaluation Journal of AustralasiaEditorial editorial2021","PeriodicalId":37231,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","volume":"21 1","pages":"3 - 6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1035719X21990117","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial\",\"authors\":\"Bronwyn Rossingh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1035719X21990117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Welcome to the first issue of the EJA for 2021. The EJA like any business or organisation is in a cycle of continuous improvement with a keen focus on developing strategies and opportunities to increase the number of submissions. We endeavour to inspire and attract articles of professional merit on any subject connected with evaluation including information of professional interest. The EJA aims to position itself as a quality journal that enjoys a growing national and international readership to ensure that the practice and theory of evaluation continue to be stimulated, expanded and strengthened while providing a platform of professional learning. This March 2021 issue encapsulates a representation of the work, history and thinking of a diverse range of evaluators who demonstrate and bring to life exactly what the EJA strives to achieve in keeping with its vision and purpose. A further platform of professional development and learning is the annual International Evaluation Conference conducted by the Australian Evaluation Society (AES) to be held in late September this year in Brisbane. The theme for the 2021 conference is Through the Lens. This theme invites prospective attendees to consider the way we reflect on the wisdom of our elders; to refract our knowledge and learning in ways that enable us to embrace diversity in our communities: as well as to refocus on the future and create shared visions that resonate. This issue provides an early introduction to some of the subthemes of the conference by offering an alternative thinking under the Refract subtheme to continually evolve and diversify our evaluative thinking and practice to be relevant. These articles also do justice to the Refocus subtheme to push the boundaries, practising on the edge and therefore expanding and strengthening knowledge within the evaluation field. It is hoped that these articles will inspire readers to submit their own articles to the EJA as early preparation for conference presentations. The peer-reviewing process supports authors to improve their submissions for eventual publication. In this issue, we have three very unique articles offering different ways of thinking in the evaluation field as the authors seek to strengthen and inform evaluation theory and practice by extending evaluative thinking through tools and knowledge sharing. In the first article for this issue, John Guenther and Ian Falk formulate a model to enable an approach to generalise from qualitative evaluation (GQE). The article titled ‘Generalising from qualitative evaluation’ commences with discussion of the definitions of generalisability in a research context, then seeks to find the differentiation 990117 EVJ0010.1177/1035719X21990117Evaluation Journal of AustralasiaEditorial editorial2021\",\"PeriodicalId\":37231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation Journal of Australasia\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"3 - 6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1035719X21990117\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation Journal of Australasia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X21990117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X21990117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欢迎收看2021年的第一期EJA。EJA与任何企业或组织一样,正处于持续改进的周期中,专注于制定战略和增加提交数量的机会。我们努力激发和吸引与评估相关的任何主题的专业文章,包括专业兴趣的信息。EJA的目标是将自己定位为一份拥有越来越多的国内和国际读者的高质量期刊,以确保在提供专业学习平台的同时,继续激发、扩大和加强评估的实践和理论。2021年3月的这期杂志概括了各种评估人员的工作、历史和思想,他们展示并实现了EJA根据其愿景和目的所努力实现的目标。另一个专业发展和学习的平台是澳大利亚评估协会将于今年9月底在布里斯班举行的年度国际评估会议。2021年大会的主题是“透过镜头”。这个主题邀请潜在的与会者思考我们反思长辈智慧的方式;以使我们能够在社区中拥抱多样性的方式折射我们的知识和学习:以及重新关注未来,创造产生共鸣的共同愿景。这个问题通过在Refract分主题下提供一种替代思维,为会议的一些分主题提供了早期介绍,以不断发展和多样化我们的评估思维和实践,使其具有相关性。这些文章也公正地对待了重新聚焦的子主题,以突破界限,在边缘实践,从而扩大和加强评估领域的知识。希望这些文章能激励读者向EJA提交自己的文章,作为会议演示的早期准备。同行评审过程支持作者改进提交的材料,以便最终出版。在本期中,我们有三篇非常独特的文章,提供了评估领域的不同思维方式,作者试图通过工具和知识共享来扩展评估思维,从而加强和告知评估理论和实践。在本期的第一篇文章中,John Guenther和Ian Falk制定了一个模型,以实现从定性评估(GQE)进行概括的方法。这篇题为“从定性评估中概括”的文章首先讨论了研究背景下概括性的定义,然后试图找到区别990117 EVJ0010.1177/1035719X21990117《澳大利亚评估杂志》编辑社论2021
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Editorial
Welcome to the first issue of the EJA for 2021. The EJA like any business or organisation is in a cycle of continuous improvement with a keen focus on developing strategies and opportunities to increase the number of submissions. We endeavour to inspire and attract articles of professional merit on any subject connected with evaluation including information of professional interest. The EJA aims to position itself as a quality journal that enjoys a growing national and international readership to ensure that the practice and theory of evaluation continue to be stimulated, expanded and strengthened while providing a platform of professional learning. This March 2021 issue encapsulates a representation of the work, history and thinking of a diverse range of evaluators who demonstrate and bring to life exactly what the EJA strives to achieve in keeping with its vision and purpose. A further platform of professional development and learning is the annual International Evaluation Conference conducted by the Australian Evaluation Society (AES) to be held in late September this year in Brisbane. The theme for the 2021 conference is Through the Lens. This theme invites prospective attendees to consider the way we reflect on the wisdom of our elders; to refract our knowledge and learning in ways that enable us to embrace diversity in our communities: as well as to refocus on the future and create shared visions that resonate. This issue provides an early introduction to some of the subthemes of the conference by offering an alternative thinking under the Refract subtheme to continually evolve and diversify our evaluative thinking and practice to be relevant. These articles also do justice to the Refocus subtheme to push the boundaries, practising on the edge and therefore expanding and strengthening knowledge within the evaluation field. It is hoped that these articles will inspire readers to submit their own articles to the EJA as early preparation for conference presentations. The peer-reviewing process supports authors to improve their submissions for eventual publication. In this issue, we have three very unique articles offering different ways of thinking in the evaluation field as the authors seek to strengthen and inform evaluation theory and practice by extending evaluative thinking through tools and knowledge sharing. In the first article for this issue, John Guenther and Ian Falk formulate a model to enable an approach to generalise from qualitative evaluation (GQE). The article titled ‘Generalising from qualitative evaluation’ commences with discussion of the definitions of generalisability in a research context, then seeks to find the differentiation 990117 EVJ0010.1177/1035719X21990117Evaluation Journal of AustralasiaEditorial editorial2021
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation Journal of Australasia
Evaluation Journal of Australasia Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Utilising existing data for a pilot social return on investment analysis of the family wellbeing empowerment program: A justification and framework Evaluation at the cutting edge: Driving innovation and quality The best medicine: Lessons from health for policy randomistas Evaluator perspective: Meet an Australian Evaluation Society Fellow – Nan Wehipeihana Meta-evaluation: Validating program evaluation standards through the United Nations Evaluation Quality Assessment (EQAs)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1