话语转向后回归经验主义?

Q2 Arts and Humanities Zeitschrift fur Religionswissenschaft Pub Date : 2021-09-13 DOI:10.1515/zfr-2021-0026

C. Becker

{"title":"话语转向后回归经验主义?","authors":"C. Becker","doi":"10.1515/zfr-2021-0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Roy ... you admit that it is existentially intransitive with respect to discourse, but then want to take it back to the level of the signifier or signified and say that this object only exists in my discursive constructions. In other words, you are contradicting yourself to say, ‘Here, that thing has a reference independently of human beings’, but at the same time you are not having a rigorous enough concept of reference, you are pulling the referent back to the level of transitive, to its constitution in discourse. (Laclau and Bhaskar 1998, 14).","PeriodicalId":38422,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Religionswissenschaft","volume":"29 1","pages":"275 - 280"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Returning to the Empirical after the Discursive Turn?\",\"authors\":\"C. Becker\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/zfr-2021-0026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Roy ... you admit that it is existentially intransitive with respect to discourse, but then want to take it back to the level of the signifier or signified and say that this object only exists in my discursive constructions. In other words, you are contradicting yourself to say, ‘Here, that thing has a reference independently of human beings’, but at the same time you are not having a rigorous enough concept of reference, you are pulling the referent back to the level of transitive, to its constitution in discourse. (Laclau and Bhaskar 1998, 14).\",\"PeriodicalId\":38422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Religionswissenschaft\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"275 - 280\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Religionswissenschaft\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/zfr-2021-0026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Religionswissenschaft","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zfr-2021-0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

罗伊。。。你承认它在话语方面是存在的不及物的，但你想把它带回能指或所指的层面，并说这个对象只存在于我的话语结构中。换言之，你自相矛盾地说，“在这里，这个东西有一个独立于人类的参照物”，但与此同时，你没有足够严格的参照物概念，你把参照物拉回到了及物性的水平，回到了它在话语中的构成。（Laclau和Bhaskar，1998年，14）。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Returning to the Empirical after the Discursive Turn?

Roy ... you admit that it is existentially intransitive with respect to discourse, but then want to take it back to the level of the signifier or signified and say that this object only exists in my discursive constructions. In other words, you are contradicting yourself to say, ‘Here, that thing has a reference independently of human beings’, but at the same time you are not having a rigorous enough concept of reference, you are pulling the referent back to the level of transitive, to its constitution in discourse. (Laclau and Bhaskar 1998, 14).

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Zeitschrift fur Religionswissenschaft Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量