从1997年《刑法》看剥夺公民权的先决条件

Cezary Kąkol
{"title":"从1997年《刑法》看剥夺公民权的先决条件","authors":"Cezary Kąkol","doi":"10.26399/iusnovum.v16.4.2022.34-c.kakol","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary The main scientific aim of the article is to present and analyse the amendment of 14 October 2021 to the prerequisites of disfranchisement laid down in Article 40 § 2 CC. The initial considerations focus on the essence and significance of the aforementioned penal measure in the system of penal measures determined in Criminal Code. The article presents the legal state before the amendment and the reasons for the amendment presented by the authors of the bill. As concerns the change of law within the scope of prerequisites of disfranchisement, the article tries to confront the mutual relationships of the present prerequisites. The considerations made it possible to formulate a series of critical conclusions concerning the legislative changes introduced and constituted and impulse to put forward a proposal de lege ferenda.","PeriodicalId":33501,"journal":{"name":"Ius Novum","volume":"16 1","pages":"7 - 22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Approach to the Prerequisites of Disfranchisement in the Light of Criminal Code of 1997\",\"authors\":\"Cezary Kąkol\",\"doi\":\"10.26399/iusnovum.v16.4.2022.34-c.kakol\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary The main scientific aim of the article is to present and analyse the amendment of 14 October 2021 to the prerequisites of disfranchisement laid down in Article 40 § 2 CC. The initial considerations focus on the essence and significance of the aforementioned penal measure in the system of penal measures determined in Criminal Code. The article presents the legal state before the amendment and the reasons for the amendment presented by the authors of the bill. As concerns the change of law within the scope of prerequisites of disfranchisement, the article tries to confront the mutual relationships of the present prerequisites. The considerations made it possible to formulate a series of critical conclusions concerning the legislative changes introduced and constituted and impulse to put forward a proposal de lege ferenda.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ius Novum\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"7 - 22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ius Novum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26399/iusnovum.v16.4.2022.34-c.kakol\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ius Novum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26399/iusnovum.v16.4.2022.34-c.kakol","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文的主要科学目的是介绍和分析2021年10月14日对《刑法典》第40条第2款规定的剥夺选举权的先决条件的修正案。初步考虑的重点是上述刑事措施在《刑法》确定的刑事措施体系中的本质和意义。该条介绍了修正前的法律状况以及法案作者提出的修正理由。关于剥夺选举权先决条件范围内的法律变更,本文试图正视当前先决条件之间的相互关系。考虑到这些因素,就提出和构成的立法修改以及提出拟议法提案的冲动,得出了一系列关键结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
New Approach to the Prerequisites of Disfranchisement in the Light of Criminal Code of 1997
Summary The main scientific aim of the article is to present and analyse the amendment of 14 October 2021 to the prerequisites of disfranchisement laid down in Article 40 § 2 CC. The initial considerations focus on the essence and significance of the aforementioned penal measure in the system of penal measures determined in Criminal Code. The article presents the legal state before the amendment and the reasons for the amendment presented by the authors of the bill. As concerns the change of law within the scope of prerequisites of disfranchisement, the article tries to confront the mutual relationships of the present prerequisites. The considerations made it possible to formulate a series of critical conclusions concerning the legislative changes introduced and constituted and impulse to put forward a proposal de lege ferenda.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Paradox of Democratic Strengthening: Criminalisation of Political Terrorism as a Legal Discrediting Mechanism The Attack on the Protected Legal Interest: A Criminalisation Principle and an Element of the Criminal Offence? Amendment to the Rights and Obligations of a Journalist in Act: Press Law from the Perspective of Conscience Clause Key Elements of the Criminal Law Conflict System, with Special Reference to Spanish Criminal Law On the Concept of an Appellate Measure in a Criminal Proceeding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1