土地变化科学中的定位、“领域”及其对知识生产和研究伦理的影响

IF 2.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Land Use Science Pub Date : 2021-12-09 DOI:10.1080/1747423X.2021.2015000
H. Hausermann, J. Adomako
{"title":"土地变化科学中的定位、“领域”及其对知识生产和研究伦理的影响","authors":"H. Hausermann, J. Adomako","doi":"10.1080/1747423X.2021.2015000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Fieldwork is often framed as an individualistic rite of passage, wherein the researcher is a ‘neutral’ observer, thereby obscuring gender, racial and citizenship hierarchies. Feminist scholars have pushed against this assumption, leading to insights on researchers’ roles in fieldwork relations and knowledge production. We combine feminist perspectives and land change science (LCS) approaches to examine interactions between researcher positoinality and knowledge production. While ‘the field’ is a critical component in LCS research, there is a dearth of critical work on positionality. We examine how our positionalities – as a black, Ghanaian graduate student and a white, tenured professor – produce differential fieldwork relations. We link our experiences and relations to methods, results and ethics, revealing important implications for LCS researchers. We conclude by suggesting validation of self-reflection on positionality, as well as disruption of white hetero-patriarchism, create inclusive spaces, in terms of social differences, epistemology and methodology.","PeriodicalId":56005,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Land Use Science","volume":"17 1","pages":"211 - 225"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Positionality, ‘the field,’ and implications for knowledge production and research ethics in land change science\",\"authors\":\"H. Hausermann, J. Adomako\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1747423X.2021.2015000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Fieldwork is often framed as an individualistic rite of passage, wherein the researcher is a ‘neutral’ observer, thereby obscuring gender, racial and citizenship hierarchies. Feminist scholars have pushed against this assumption, leading to insights on researchers’ roles in fieldwork relations and knowledge production. We combine feminist perspectives and land change science (LCS) approaches to examine interactions between researcher positoinality and knowledge production. While ‘the field’ is a critical component in LCS research, there is a dearth of critical work on positionality. We examine how our positionalities – as a black, Ghanaian graduate student and a white, tenured professor – produce differential fieldwork relations. We link our experiences and relations to methods, results and ethics, revealing important implications for LCS researchers. We conclude by suggesting validation of self-reflection on positionality, as well as disruption of white hetero-patriarchism, create inclusive spaces, in terms of social differences, epistemology and methodology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Land Use Science\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"211 - 225\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Land Use Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2021.2015000\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Land Use Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2021.2015000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

田野调查通常被视为一种个人主义的成人仪式,其中研究者是一个“中立”的观察者,因此模糊了性别、种族和公民身份的等级。女权主义学者反对这一假设,从而对研究人员在实地工作关系和知识生产中的角色产生了见解。我们将女权主义观点与土地变化科学(LCS)方法相结合,研究研究者的积极性与知识生产之间的相互作用。虽然“领域”是LCS研究的关键组成部分,但缺乏关于定位的关键工作。我们研究了我们的身份——作为一名黑人加纳研究生和一名白人终身教授——是如何产生不同的实地工作关系的。我们将我们的经验和关系与方法、结果和伦理联系起来,揭示了对LCS研究人员的重要启示。最后,我们建议在社会差异、认识论和方法论方面,验证对位置性的自我反思,以及对白人异性父权制的破坏,创造包容性空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Positionality, ‘the field,’ and implications for knowledge production and research ethics in land change science
ABSTRACT Fieldwork is often framed as an individualistic rite of passage, wherein the researcher is a ‘neutral’ observer, thereby obscuring gender, racial and citizenship hierarchies. Feminist scholars have pushed against this assumption, leading to insights on researchers’ roles in fieldwork relations and knowledge production. We combine feminist perspectives and land change science (LCS) approaches to examine interactions between researcher positoinality and knowledge production. While ‘the field’ is a critical component in LCS research, there is a dearth of critical work on positionality. We examine how our positionalities – as a black, Ghanaian graduate student and a white, tenured professor – produce differential fieldwork relations. We link our experiences and relations to methods, results and ethics, revealing important implications for LCS researchers. We conclude by suggesting validation of self-reflection on positionality, as well as disruption of white hetero-patriarchism, create inclusive spaces, in terms of social differences, epistemology and methodology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Land Use Science
Journal of Land Use Science Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Journal of Land Use Science provides a central outlet for high-quality articles on theoretical and empirical aspects of land-use science at the interface of social and environmental systems. The Journal brings together an array of research perspectives at multiple temporal, spatial and social scales that contribute a better understanding of land-system dynamics and communicate scientific advances towards attaining land-system sustainability.
期刊最新文献
How does the effect of urban growth management change over time and across urban land uses? Evidence from China’s construction land quotas Decision-making factors influencing land use transformation and its implication on forest landscape restoration in Ethiopia Critical overview of the expansion of Hass avocado plantations in Salamina, northern Caldas, Colombia Exploring land use conflicts arising from economic activities and their impacts on local communities in the European Arctic Industry-specific impacts of global drivers in the European Arctic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1