新佛教运动的烙印:新噶当巴传统对“现代佛教”的自我认同

Q1 Arts and Humanities Journal of Global Buddhism Pub Date : 2020-10-04 DOI:10.5281/4030961
Christopher Emory-Moore
{"title":"新佛教运动的烙印:新噶当巴传统对“现代佛教”的自我认同","authors":"Christopher Emory-Moore","doi":"10.5281/4030961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the New Kadampa Tradition’s North American missionary deployment of the epithet “Modern Buddhism” in publicity, text, and teaching. I argue that while “Modern Buddhism” branding supports the NKT’s international growth by promoting its founder’s teachings as universally accessible and not Tibetan, those teachings are more continuous with traditional Geluk doctrine than with David McMahan’s (2008) portrayal of Buddhist modernism. Specifically, I find minimal evidence of detraditionalization, demythologization, and psychologization in the NKT founder’s 2011 book Modern Buddhism and in public meditation instruction derived therefrom at a Canadian NKT center. My findings locate the NKT’s deployment of the “Modern Buddhism” brand within a graduated missionizing strategy that combines promotional modernism and pedagogical traditionalism to attract North American non-Buddhists by offering culturally desired, this-worldly benefits (e.g., stress reduction) followed by less familiar, other-worldly Buddhist goals (e.g., happiness in future lives).","PeriodicalId":37110,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Buddhism","volume":"21 1","pages":"11-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Branding a New Buddhist Movement: The New Kadampa Tradition’s Self- Identification as “Modern Buddhism”\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Emory-Moore\",\"doi\":\"10.5281/4030961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the New Kadampa Tradition’s North American missionary deployment of the epithet “Modern Buddhism” in publicity, text, and teaching. I argue that while “Modern Buddhism” branding supports the NKT’s international growth by promoting its founder’s teachings as universally accessible and not Tibetan, those teachings are more continuous with traditional Geluk doctrine than with David McMahan’s (2008) portrayal of Buddhist modernism. Specifically, I find minimal evidence of detraditionalization, demythologization, and psychologization in the NKT founder’s 2011 book Modern Buddhism and in public meditation instruction derived therefrom at a Canadian NKT center. My findings locate the NKT’s deployment of the “Modern Buddhism” brand within a graduated missionizing strategy that combines promotional modernism and pedagogical traditionalism to attract North American non-Buddhists by offering culturally desired, this-worldly benefits (e.g., stress reduction) followed by less familiar, other-worldly Buddhist goals (e.g., happiness in future lives).\",\"PeriodicalId\":37110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Buddhism\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"11-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Buddhism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/4030961\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Buddhism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/4030961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了新噶当巴传统在北美传教士在宣传、文本和教学中对“现代佛教”这一称谓的运用。我认为,虽然“现代佛教”品牌通过宣传其创始人的教义是普遍可及的,而不是藏传的,从而支持了NKT的国际发展,但这些教义与传统格鲁派教义相比,比大卫·麦克马汉(2008)对佛教现代主义的描绘更具有连续性。具体来说,我在NKT创始人2011年出版的《现代佛教》一书中,以及在加拿大NKT中心衍生的公共冥想指导中,发现了很少的去传统化、去神话化和心理化的证据。我的发现将NKT对“现代佛教”品牌的部署定位于一个逐步的传教策略中,该策略结合了宣传现代主义和教学传统主义,通过提供文化上期望的、现世的利益(例如,减轻压力)来吸引北美的非佛教徒,然后是不太熟悉的、来世的佛教目标(例如,来世的幸福)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Branding a New Buddhist Movement: The New Kadampa Tradition’s Self- Identification as “Modern Buddhism”
This article examines the New Kadampa Tradition’s North American missionary deployment of the epithet “Modern Buddhism” in publicity, text, and teaching. I argue that while “Modern Buddhism” branding supports the NKT’s international growth by promoting its founder’s teachings as universally accessible and not Tibetan, those teachings are more continuous with traditional Geluk doctrine than with David McMahan’s (2008) portrayal of Buddhist modernism. Specifically, I find minimal evidence of detraditionalization, demythologization, and psychologization in the NKT founder’s 2011 book Modern Buddhism and in public meditation instruction derived therefrom at a Canadian NKT center. My findings locate the NKT’s deployment of the “Modern Buddhism” brand within a graduated missionizing strategy that combines promotional modernism and pedagogical traditionalism to attract North American non-Buddhists by offering culturally desired, this-worldly benefits (e.g., stress reduction) followed by less familiar, other-worldly Buddhist goals (e.g., happiness in future lives).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Global Buddhism
Journal of Global Buddhism Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sera Monastery Interpersonal Karma: A Note Universal Karma Sociokarma and Kindred Spirits: An Acknowledgement Ravana's Kingdom: The Ramayana and Sri Lankan History from Below
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1