Dipnet调查提供了透镜繁殖两栖动物幼虫的准确丰度估计

IF 1.3 3区 生物学 Q2 ZOOLOGY Herpetologica Pub Date : 2023-06-28 DOI:10.1655/Herpetologica-D-22-00010
David G. Cook, Leyna R. Stemle, Christopher A. Searcy
{"title":"Dipnet调查提供了透镜繁殖两栖动物幼虫的准确丰度估计","authors":"David G. Cook, Leyna R. Stemle, Christopher A. Searcy","doi":"10.1655/Herpetologica-D-22-00010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Several aquatic sampling techniques are commonly used to detect and quantify amphibian larvae. Although many techniques have been standardized, comparisons among methods have been poorly studied. We employed a removal design to investigate the detection rate of amphibian larvae using box enclosures and evaluated the reliability of timed dipnet sampling relative to the more quantitative box enclosure sampling across 13 vernal pools. For these comparisons, we studied larvae of the endangered California Tiger Salamander (Ambystoma californiense; CTS) and the smaller and more abundant tadpoles of the Pacific Treefrog (Pseudacris regilla; PTF). Based on N-mixture model estimates, box enclosure sampling captured only 5% more of the CTS larvae present than PTF tadpoles, despite disparities in their sizes and estimated abundances. Dipnet sampling was slightly more effective at detecting CTS larvae than was enclosure sampling, while both methods equally detected PTF tadpoles. We found a strong relationship (R2 = 0.92) between the densities of CTS larvae estimated from dipnet sampling and those calculated from the more quantitative enclosure sampling, indicating that dipnet sampling is a reliable measurement of relative abundance. We conclude that timed dipnet surveys can be an important tool for monitoring populations of CTS, and possibly other lenticbreeding amphibians, especially given its relative efficiency that can be replicated across both time and space.","PeriodicalId":56312,"journal":{"name":"Herpetologica","volume":"79 1","pages":"73 - 78"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dipnet Surveys Provide Accurate Abundance Estimates for Lentic-Breeding Amphibian Larvae\",\"authors\":\"David G. Cook, Leyna R. Stemle, Christopher A. Searcy\",\"doi\":\"10.1655/Herpetologica-D-22-00010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: Several aquatic sampling techniques are commonly used to detect and quantify amphibian larvae. Although many techniques have been standardized, comparisons among methods have been poorly studied. We employed a removal design to investigate the detection rate of amphibian larvae using box enclosures and evaluated the reliability of timed dipnet sampling relative to the more quantitative box enclosure sampling across 13 vernal pools. For these comparisons, we studied larvae of the endangered California Tiger Salamander (Ambystoma californiense; CTS) and the smaller and more abundant tadpoles of the Pacific Treefrog (Pseudacris regilla; PTF). Based on N-mixture model estimates, box enclosure sampling captured only 5% more of the CTS larvae present than PTF tadpoles, despite disparities in their sizes and estimated abundances. Dipnet sampling was slightly more effective at detecting CTS larvae than was enclosure sampling, while both methods equally detected PTF tadpoles. We found a strong relationship (R2 = 0.92) between the densities of CTS larvae estimated from dipnet sampling and those calculated from the more quantitative enclosure sampling, indicating that dipnet sampling is a reliable measurement of relative abundance. We conclude that timed dipnet surveys can be an important tool for monitoring populations of CTS, and possibly other lenticbreeding amphibians, especially given its relative efficiency that can be replicated across both time and space.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Herpetologica\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"73 - 78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Herpetologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1655/Herpetologica-D-22-00010\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herpetologica","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1655/Herpetologica-D-22-00010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:几种水生采样技术通常用于检测和量化两栖动物幼虫。尽管许多技术已经标准化,但对方法之间的比较研究很少。我们采用了一种移除设计来调查使用箱式围栏的两栖动物幼虫的检测率,并评估了定时dipnet采样相对于13个春季水池中更定量的箱式围栏采样的可靠性。为了进行这些比较,我们研究了濒危的加利福尼亚虎蝾螈(Ambystoma californense;CTS)和太平洋树蛙(Pseudacris regilla;PTF)中体型较小、数量较多的蝌蚪的幼虫。根据N-混合物模型的估计,尽管CTS幼虫的大小和估计的丰度存在差异,但箱围采样捕获的CTS幼虫仅比PTF蝌蚪多5%。Dipnet采样在检测CTS幼虫方面比围栏采样更有效,而两种方法都能同样检测到PTF蝌蚪。我们发现,通过双网采样估计的CTS幼虫密度与通过更定量的围栏采样计算的CTS幼虫的密度之间存在很强的关系(R2=0.92),这表明双网采样是相对丰度的可靠测量。我们得出的结论是,定时双网调查可以成为监测CTS种群以及其他慢食两栖动物种群的重要工具,特别是考虑到其相对效率可以在时间和空间上复制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dipnet Surveys Provide Accurate Abundance Estimates for Lentic-Breeding Amphibian Larvae
Abstract: Several aquatic sampling techniques are commonly used to detect and quantify amphibian larvae. Although many techniques have been standardized, comparisons among methods have been poorly studied. We employed a removal design to investigate the detection rate of amphibian larvae using box enclosures and evaluated the reliability of timed dipnet sampling relative to the more quantitative box enclosure sampling across 13 vernal pools. For these comparisons, we studied larvae of the endangered California Tiger Salamander (Ambystoma californiense; CTS) and the smaller and more abundant tadpoles of the Pacific Treefrog (Pseudacris regilla; PTF). Based on N-mixture model estimates, box enclosure sampling captured only 5% more of the CTS larvae present than PTF tadpoles, despite disparities in their sizes and estimated abundances. Dipnet sampling was slightly more effective at detecting CTS larvae than was enclosure sampling, while both methods equally detected PTF tadpoles. We found a strong relationship (R2 = 0.92) between the densities of CTS larvae estimated from dipnet sampling and those calculated from the more quantitative enclosure sampling, indicating that dipnet sampling is a reliable measurement of relative abundance. We conclude that timed dipnet surveys can be an important tool for monitoring populations of CTS, and possibly other lenticbreeding amphibians, especially given its relative efficiency that can be replicated across both time and space.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Herpetologica
Herpetologica 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1936, Herpetologica is a quarterly peer-reviewed journal serving herpetologists, biologists, ecologists, conservationists, researchers and the scientific community. The journal contains original research papers and essays about the biology of reptiles and amphibians, and covers many relevant topics including: behavior, conservation, ecology, genetics, morphology, physiology and taxonomy.
期刊最新文献
Awardees of the 2023 E.E. Williams Research Grants Joseph C. Mitchell Grant in Herpetology Call for Applications E.E. Williams Research Grant Call for Applications Water Turbidity and Plant Density Influence Shell Shape in Painted Turtles (Chrysemys picta) First Comprehensive Tadpole Description of the Relict and Endemic Mountain Frog Chrysopaa sternosignata (Murray 1885) from Afghanistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1