数学教科书中意义创造的潜力

Malin Norberg
{"title":"数学教科书中意义创造的潜力","authors":"Malin Norberg","doi":"10.16993/DFL.123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A Multimodal Analysis of Subtraction in Swedish Year 1 Textbooks are a common teaching tool widely used in children’s mathematical education. Comparative studies of textbooks have focused on different aspects, such as content, mathematical symbols and so on. However, a multimodal approach to textbook research—that is, studying how writing, images, mathematical symbols, etc. interact—is sparse. This study analyses 40 exercises from 17 Swedish Year 1 (children 7–8 years) textbooks using a multimodal approach with a focus on subtraction as an arithmetic operation. The aim was to describe and analyse how subtraction in Swedish Year 1 mathematics textbooks can be understood using a multimodal approach. The results show that it is sometimes possible to solve an exercise without focusing on the mathematical content that the exercise is designed to offer. Writing, images, mathematical symbols, speech and moving images are used differently within the same textbook and between textbooks. The results also show that there are considerable similarities between the exercises in printed and digital textbooks, with some exceptions. The examples in the study indicate that three different approaches are needed when working with these exercises, which implies great complexity in children’s meaning making in their work with mathematics textbooks. This could negatively impact children’s access to beneficial learning situations. Therefore, this study could contribute to a larger awareness of the complexity in question, which, by extension, may contribute to the development of beneficial learning situations in mathematics education, especially regarding subtraction.","PeriodicalId":31187,"journal":{"name":"Designs for Learning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potential for Meaning Making in Mathematics Textbooks\",\"authors\":\"Malin Norberg\",\"doi\":\"10.16993/DFL.123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A Multimodal Analysis of Subtraction in Swedish Year 1 Textbooks are a common teaching tool widely used in children’s mathematical education. Comparative studies of textbooks have focused on different aspects, such as content, mathematical symbols and so on. However, a multimodal approach to textbook research—that is, studying how writing, images, mathematical symbols, etc. interact—is sparse. This study analyses 40 exercises from 17 Swedish Year 1 (children 7–8 years) textbooks using a multimodal approach with a focus on subtraction as an arithmetic operation. The aim was to describe and analyse how subtraction in Swedish Year 1 mathematics textbooks can be understood using a multimodal approach. The results show that it is sometimes possible to solve an exercise without focusing on the mathematical content that the exercise is designed to offer. Writing, images, mathematical symbols, speech and moving images are used differently within the same textbook and between textbooks. The results also show that there are considerable similarities between the exercises in printed and digital textbooks, with some exceptions. The examples in the study indicate that three different approaches are needed when working with these exercises, which implies great complexity in children’s meaning making in their work with mathematics textbooks. This could negatively impact children’s access to beneficial learning situations. Therefore, this study could contribute to a larger awareness of the complexity in question, which, by extension, may contribute to the development of beneficial learning situations in mathematics education, especially regarding subtraction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Designs for Learning\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Designs for Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16993/DFL.123\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Designs for Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16993/DFL.123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

瑞典一年级教材中减法的多模态分析是儿童数学教育中广泛使用的常用教学工具。对教科书的比较研究集中在不同的方面,如内容、数学符号等。然而,对教科书研究的多模式方法——即研究写作、图像、数学符号等等如何相互作用——却很少。这项研究分析了17本瑞典一年级(7-8岁儿童)教科书中的40项练习,采用了多模式方法,重点是将减法作为一种算术运算。目的是描述和分析如何使用多模式方法理解瑞典一年级数学教科书中的减法。结果表明,有时可以在不关注练习所提供的数学内容的情况下解决练习。写作、图像、数学符号、言语和运动图像在同一本教科书中和不同的教科书中使用不同。研究结果还表明,除了一些例外,印刷版和数字版教科书中的练习有相当大的相似性。研究中的例子表明,在进行这些练习时需要三种不同的方法,这意味着儿童在使用数学课本时的意义形成非常复杂。这可能会对儿童获得有益学习环境产生负面影响。因此,这项研究可能有助于更大程度地认识到问题的复杂性,进而有助于在数学教育中发展有益的学习环境,尤其是在减法方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Potential for Meaning Making in Mathematics Textbooks
A Multimodal Analysis of Subtraction in Swedish Year 1 Textbooks are a common teaching tool widely used in children’s mathematical education. Comparative studies of textbooks have focused on different aspects, such as content, mathematical symbols and so on. However, a multimodal approach to textbook research—that is, studying how writing, images, mathematical symbols, etc. interact—is sparse. This study analyses 40 exercises from 17 Swedish Year 1 (children 7–8 years) textbooks using a multimodal approach with a focus on subtraction as an arithmetic operation. The aim was to describe and analyse how subtraction in Swedish Year 1 mathematics textbooks can be understood using a multimodal approach. The results show that it is sometimes possible to solve an exercise without focusing on the mathematical content that the exercise is designed to offer. Writing, images, mathematical symbols, speech and moving images are used differently within the same textbook and between textbooks. The results also show that there are considerable similarities between the exercises in printed and digital textbooks, with some exceptions. The examples in the study indicate that three different approaches are needed when working with these exercises, which implies great complexity in children’s meaning making in their work with mathematics textbooks. This could negatively impact children’s access to beneficial learning situations. Therefore, this study could contribute to a larger awareness of the complexity in question, which, by extension, may contribute to the development of beneficial learning situations in mathematics education, especially regarding subtraction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessing Students’ Multimodal Texts in the Subject of English: Synthesising Peers’ and Teachers’ Recognition of Semiotic Work App-Genres for Children’s Agency – Affordances in Applications Used in Preschool Design Sprint Workshops – Exploring a Data-Based Method in Mathematics Education Motivational Factors for Empowering People with Diabetes and the Influence of Perceived Self-Efficacy Editorial for the Special Collection: Remediation of Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1