真诚祈祷:真诚与信仰的诱导

IF 0.5 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS Pub Date : 2023-01-12 DOI:10.1111/jore.12415
Michael Haruni
{"title":"真诚祈祷:真诚与信仰的诱导","authors":"Michael Haruni","doi":"10.1111/jore.12415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In a Jewish context, it seems, it is a naïve consensus view that in praying liturgically one aims to express to God, in the manner of ordinary, interpersonal conversation, those thoughts stated by the text. But on this ordinary conversation model (OCM), a problem of insincerity arises when, as commonly happens, the text states a claim the practitioner does not believe. The idea of redeeming one's prayer by <i>reinterpretation</i> is, I argue, incompatible with OCM. Another strategy, which finds some encouragement in Jewish tradition, is to try <i>inducing the missing belief</i>. I further argue, however, that for one's expression of a belief to be proper, in the sense of being <i>authentic</i>, this belief must be corroborated by the evolving, diachronically largely-coherent understanding distinctive of one's person—a requirement which an induced, otherwise-missing belief cannot fulfill. This, I suggest, provides some reason to seek a model of liturgical prayer different from OCM.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":45722,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Praying Truthfully: Sincerity and the Inducing of Belief\",\"authors\":\"Michael Haruni\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jore.12415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>In a Jewish context, it seems, it is a naïve consensus view that in praying liturgically one aims to express to God, in the manner of ordinary, interpersonal conversation, those thoughts stated by the text. But on this ordinary conversation model (OCM), a problem of insincerity arises when, as commonly happens, the text states a claim the practitioner does not believe. The idea of redeeming one's prayer by <i>reinterpretation</i> is, I argue, incompatible with OCM. Another strategy, which finds some encouragement in Jewish tradition, is to try <i>inducing the missing belief</i>. I further argue, however, that for one's expression of a belief to be proper, in the sense of being <i>authentic</i>, this belief must be corroborated by the evolving, diachronically largely-coherent understanding distinctive of one's person—a requirement which an induced, otherwise-missing belief cannot fulfill. This, I suggest, provides some reason to seek a model of liturgical prayer different from OCM.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jore.12415\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jore.12415","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在犹太人的背景下,这似乎是naïve共识的观点,在祈祷仪式中,一个人的目的是向上帝表达,以普通的,人际交流的方式,那些文本所陈述的想法。但在这种普通对话模式(OCM)中,当文本陈述一个实践者不相信的主张时,就会出现不真诚的问题。我认为,通过重新解释来弥补祈祷的想法与OCM是不相容的。另一种策略,在犹太传统中找到一些鼓励,是尝试诱导缺失的信仰。然而,我进一步认为,一个人对信念的表达要恰当,在真实的意义上,这种信念必须得到对个人特征的不断发展的、历时性的、大量连贯的理解的证实——这是一种诱导的、否则就缺失的信念无法满足的要求。我认为,这为寻求一种不同于OCM的礼仪祈祷模式提供了一些理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Praying Truthfully: Sincerity and the Inducing of Belief

In a Jewish context, it seems, it is a naïve consensus view that in praying liturgically one aims to express to God, in the manner of ordinary, interpersonal conversation, those thoughts stated by the text. But on this ordinary conversation model (OCM), a problem of insincerity arises when, as commonly happens, the text states a claim the practitioner does not believe. The idea of redeeming one's prayer by reinterpretation is, I argue, incompatible with OCM. Another strategy, which finds some encouragement in Jewish tradition, is to try inducing the missing belief. I further argue, however, that for one's expression of a belief to be proper, in the sense of being authentic, this belief must be corroborated by the evolving, diachronically largely-coherent understanding distinctive of one's person—a requirement which an induced, otherwise-missing belief cannot fulfill. This, I suggest, provides some reason to seek a model of liturgical prayer different from OCM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Founded in 1973, the Journal of Religious Ethics is committed to publishing the very best scholarship in religious ethics, to fostering new work in neglected areas, and to stimulating exchange on significant issues. Emphasizing comparative religious ethics, foundational conceptual and methodological issues in religious ethics, and historical studies of influential figures and texts, each issue contains independent essays, commissioned articles, and a book review essay, as well as a Letters, Notes, and Comments section. Published primarily for scholars working in ethics, religious studies, history of religions, and theology, the journal is also of interest to scholars working in related fields such as philosophy, history, social and political theory, and literary studies.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Religion, Race, and the Limit of Ethics: Historical Considerations A Daoist Critique of Effort in Pierre Hadot's Philosophy Animism, Eco-Immanence, and Divine Transcendence: Toward an Integrated Religious Framework for Environmental Ethics Kierkegaard, Social Media, and Despair
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1