生存放射学:在COVID-19大流行期间,流行的现场互动医科学生放射学研讨会如何转向在线

IF 0.4 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare Pub Date : 2022-02-10 DOI:10.1177/20101058211055306
Jyothirmayi Velaga, Sonia Shu Yi Lee, Nguyen Tuan Anh Tran, Bimal Mayur Kumar Vora, L. T. Cheng
{"title":"生存放射学:在COVID-19大流行期间,流行的现场互动医科学生放射学研讨会如何转向在线","authors":"Jyothirmayi Velaga, Sonia Shu Yi Lee, Nguyen Tuan Anh Tran, Bimal Mayur Kumar Vora, L. T. Cheng","doi":"10.1177/20101058211055306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Survival Radiology (SR) is a flagship annual full-day in-person radiology workshop targeted at final year medical students in Singapore to prepare them for internship. Previous in-person editions have consistently received positive reviews from 2014 to 2019. However, the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid online pivot for its sixth edition in 2020. Objectives This study aims to (a) identify key success factors of a traditional in-person medical student radiology workshop, (b) describe the rapid online pivot in 2020 and (c) to identify key success factors for online educational initiatives. Methods Post-workshop survey responses of SR from 2014 to 2020 were evaluated. Likert-scale data were quantitatively analysed, while free-text responses were qualitatively analysed. Results A total of 1248 post-workshop surveys (2014–2020 workshops) and 266 free-text responses (2020 workshop) were received from 2640 participants over the years. Progressive changes that sustained or improved participant feedback for in-person SR workshops included adoption of a case-based approach, utility of ‘live’ audience response systems and incorporation of quizzes with a favourable overall feedback rating of 4.42–4.89 from 2014 to 2019. The webinar version of SR in 2020 became the best-rated edition since inception with a rating of 4.9. Qualitative analysis of feedback from SR 2020 showed that the participants preferred the webinar model, online modes of engagement and interactivity. Conclusion Our experience shows that it is not only possible to successfully pivot online for such workshops, but that blended educational formats utilising online engagements supplemented by in-person activities will be well-received by ‘Generation Z’ learners even after the COVID-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":44685,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survival Radiology: How a popular in-person interactive medical student radiology workshop pivoted online during the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Jyothirmayi Velaga, Sonia Shu Yi Lee, Nguyen Tuan Anh Tran, Bimal Mayur Kumar Vora, L. T. Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20101058211055306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Survival Radiology (SR) is a flagship annual full-day in-person radiology workshop targeted at final year medical students in Singapore to prepare them for internship. Previous in-person editions have consistently received positive reviews from 2014 to 2019. However, the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid online pivot for its sixth edition in 2020. Objectives This study aims to (a) identify key success factors of a traditional in-person medical student radiology workshop, (b) describe the rapid online pivot in 2020 and (c) to identify key success factors for online educational initiatives. Methods Post-workshop survey responses of SR from 2014 to 2020 were evaluated. Likert-scale data were quantitatively analysed, while free-text responses were qualitatively analysed. Results A total of 1248 post-workshop surveys (2014–2020 workshops) and 266 free-text responses (2020 workshop) were received from 2640 participants over the years. Progressive changes that sustained or improved participant feedback for in-person SR workshops included adoption of a case-based approach, utility of ‘live’ audience response systems and incorporation of quizzes with a favourable overall feedback rating of 4.42–4.89 from 2014 to 2019. The webinar version of SR in 2020 became the best-rated edition since inception with a rating of 4.9. Qualitative analysis of feedback from SR 2020 showed that the participants preferred the webinar model, online modes of engagement and interactivity. Conclusion Our experience shows that it is not only possible to successfully pivot online for such workshops, but that blended educational formats utilising online engagements supplemented by in-person activities will be well-received by ‘Generation Z’ learners even after the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20101058211055306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20101058211055306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景生存放射学(SR)是一个旗舰的年度全天面对面放射学研讨会,面向新加坡医学院大四学生,为他们的实习做准备。从2014年到2019年,之前的面授版一直获得积极评价。然而,新冠肺炎大流行需要在2020年的第六版中快速进行在线调整。目的本研究旨在(a)确定传统面对面医学生放射学研讨会的关键成功因素,(b)描述2020年的快速在线转型,以及(c)确定在线教育举措的关键成功因子。方法对2014年至2020年SR的会后调查结果进行评估。Likert量表数据进行了定量分析,而自由文本回答则进行了定性分析。结果多年来,共收到2640名参与者的1248份研讨会后调查(2014-2012年研讨会)和266份免费文本回复(2020年研讨会)。持续或改善参与者对面对面SR研讨会反馈的渐进变化包括采用基于案例的方法,使用“现场”观众反应系统,并在2014年至2019年期间纳入总体反馈评分为4.42–4.89的测验。2020年的SR网络研讨会版本以4.9的评分成为自成立以来收视率最高的版本。对SR 2020反馈的定性分析表明,参与者更喜欢网络研讨会模式、在线参与和互动模式。结论我们的经验表明,即使在新冠肺炎大流行之后,利用在线参与和现场活动补充的混合教育形式也将受到“Z世代”学习者的欢迎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Survival Radiology: How a popular in-person interactive medical student radiology workshop pivoted online during the COVID-19 pandemic
Background Survival Radiology (SR) is a flagship annual full-day in-person radiology workshop targeted at final year medical students in Singapore to prepare them for internship. Previous in-person editions have consistently received positive reviews from 2014 to 2019. However, the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid online pivot for its sixth edition in 2020. Objectives This study aims to (a) identify key success factors of a traditional in-person medical student radiology workshop, (b) describe the rapid online pivot in 2020 and (c) to identify key success factors for online educational initiatives. Methods Post-workshop survey responses of SR from 2014 to 2020 were evaluated. Likert-scale data were quantitatively analysed, while free-text responses were qualitatively analysed. Results A total of 1248 post-workshop surveys (2014–2020 workshops) and 266 free-text responses (2020 workshop) were received from 2640 participants over the years. Progressive changes that sustained or improved participant feedback for in-person SR workshops included adoption of a case-based approach, utility of ‘live’ audience response systems and incorporation of quizzes with a favourable overall feedback rating of 4.42–4.89 from 2014 to 2019. The webinar version of SR in 2020 became the best-rated edition since inception with a rating of 4.9. Qualitative analysis of feedback from SR 2020 showed that the participants preferred the webinar model, online modes of engagement and interactivity. Conclusion Our experience shows that it is not only possible to successfully pivot online for such workshops, but that blended educational formats utilising online engagements supplemented by in-person activities will be well-received by ‘Generation Z’ learners even after the COVID-19 pandemic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare
Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
A case report and literature review of iatrogenic copper deficiency myeloneuropathy due to zinc treatment in patients with Wilson’s disease A blended learning program focusing on comprehensive opioid management in pain (COMP): A pilot program Clinical impact of pharmacists’ interventions in intensive care units in a tertiary institution in Singapore – A retrospective cohort study Assessing the reliability and feasibility of frailty screening tools among hospitalised older adults Do not dismiss interstitial lung abnormalities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1