美国对股权众筹的监管:英国的遗留问题和教训

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q1 LAW Journal of Corporate Law Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/14735970.2022.2040815
Yanzhe Li
{"title":"美国对股权众筹的监管:英国的遗留问题和教训","authors":"Yanzhe Li","doi":"10.1080/14735970.2022.2040815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Equity crowdfunding (ECF) provides small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) with affordable access to funds, but it may expose investors to various risks. To promote capital formation for SMEs while maintaining adequate investor protection, the US has adopted a special ECF regime under the JOBS Act of 2012 and more recently made some amendments to it. However, two key problems of this regime remain to be addressed. One lies in the mandated issuer disclosures under the crowdfunding exemption. The other relates to the unduly burdensome funding portal regime. This article turns to the regulation of ECF in the UK to explore whether it has anything for the US to learn from. The comparative analysis demonstrates that, despite some high-level similarities, the two regimes have notable differences that determine the different impacts on ECF market actors. Drawing insights from the UK experience, the article makes recommendations for improving the US regime.","PeriodicalId":44517,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Law Studies","volume":"22 1","pages":"265 - 298"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The regulation of equity crowdfunding in the US: remaining concerns and lessons from the UK\",\"authors\":\"Yanzhe Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14735970.2022.2040815\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Equity crowdfunding (ECF) provides small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) with affordable access to funds, but it may expose investors to various risks. To promote capital formation for SMEs while maintaining adequate investor protection, the US has adopted a special ECF regime under the JOBS Act of 2012 and more recently made some amendments to it. However, two key problems of this regime remain to be addressed. One lies in the mandated issuer disclosures under the crowdfunding exemption. The other relates to the unduly burdensome funding portal regime. This article turns to the regulation of ECF in the UK to explore whether it has anything for the US to learn from. The comparative analysis demonstrates that, despite some high-level similarities, the two regimes have notable differences that determine the different impacts on ECF market actors. Drawing insights from the UK experience, the article makes recommendations for improving the US regime.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Corporate Law Studies\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"265 - 298\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Corporate Law Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2022.2040815\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Law Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2022.2040815","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

股权众筹(ECF)为中小企业提供了负担得起的融资渠道,但也给投资者带来了各种风险。为了促进中小企业的资本形成,同时保持充分的投资者保护,美国在2012年的《就业法案》下采用了一种特殊的ECF制度,并在最近对其进行了一些修订。然而,这一制度的两个关键问题仍有待解决。一是众筹豁免下强制发行人披露。另一个问题与过于繁重的资金门户制度有关。本文以英国对ECF的监管为例,探讨其是否有值得美国借鉴的地方。比较分析表明,尽管存在一些高度的相似性,但两种制度存在显著差异,这决定了对ECF市场参与者的不同影响。本文借鉴英国的经验,对完善美国的制度提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The regulation of equity crowdfunding in the US: remaining concerns and lessons from the UK
ABSTRACT Equity crowdfunding (ECF) provides small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) with affordable access to funds, but it may expose investors to various risks. To promote capital formation for SMEs while maintaining adequate investor protection, the US has adopted a special ECF regime under the JOBS Act of 2012 and more recently made some amendments to it. However, two key problems of this regime remain to be addressed. One lies in the mandated issuer disclosures under the crowdfunding exemption. The other relates to the unduly burdensome funding portal regime. This article turns to the regulation of ECF in the UK to explore whether it has anything for the US to learn from. The comparative analysis demonstrates that, despite some high-level similarities, the two regimes have notable differences that determine the different impacts on ECF market actors. Drawing insights from the UK experience, the article makes recommendations for improving the US regime.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
The extension of vicarious liability in corporate groups Investor personhood: the case against paternalism and welfarism in corporate law Separate legal personality – an explanation and a defence Directors’ positive duty to act in the interests of the entity: shareholders’ interests bounded by corporate purpose Private credit: a renaissance in corporate finance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1