一项回顾性研究显示,吸烟者和非吸烟者的周期阈值和2019年冠状病毒病临床类型没有显著关联,尽管临床类型显示吸烟者处于高风险中

IF 1 Q4 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_86_23
A. Azad, Suboor Naik, A. Malik, Varshiesh Raina
{"title":"一项回顾性研究显示,吸烟者和非吸烟者的周期阈值和2019年冠状病毒病临床类型没有显著关联,尽管临床类型显示吸烟者处于高风险中","authors":"A. Azad, Suboor Naik, A. Malik, Varshiesh Raina","doi":"10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_86_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Emerging epidemiological studies indicate a paradoxical association between smoking and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This retrospective study aimed to investigate the association between cycle threshold (Ct) values and clinical type among COVID-19-positive smokers and nonsmokers. Methods: The study was conducted from October 3, 2020, to October 3, 2022. Five hundred and sixty COVID-19 patients were enrolled, which included 320 smoking group (SG) and 240 non-SG (NSG). Demographic and clinical features were acquired, and comparison was based drawn on gender, age, Ct range, and clinical type (mild/mild-moderate/severe COVID-19). COVID-19 was confirmed by real time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction test based on Ct value below 35. Results: Initial evaluation revealed no significant association between Ct range and clinical type either within or between SG and NSG. Follow-up at 7/14 days revealed no significant difference between the groups for Ct range/clinical type; however, within groups Ct range showed a clear change towards higher values. The recovery rate was also evaluated which displayed no difference at 7 days while at 14 days' recover rate was 47.5% for SG and 80.0% for NSG. Moreover, in both groups un-recovered patients were mostly observed either in mild-moderate and severe COVID state; however, SG showed more patients in mild-moderate group and longer discharge time. Conclusions: We found that Ct value and clinical type have no significant association in COVID-19 smokers versus nonsmokers and smokers are at high risk and take a longer time to recover from COVID.","PeriodicalId":36500,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cycle threshold value and coronavirus disease 2019 clinical type among smokers and nonsmokers reveal no significant association despite clinical type shows smokers are at high risk: A retrospective study\",\"authors\":\"A. Azad, Suboor Naik, A. Malik, Varshiesh Raina\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_86_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Emerging epidemiological studies indicate a paradoxical association between smoking and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This retrospective study aimed to investigate the association between cycle threshold (Ct) values and clinical type among COVID-19-positive smokers and nonsmokers. Methods: The study was conducted from October 3, 2020, to October 3, 2022. Five hundred and sixty COVID-19 patients were enrolled, which included 320 smoking group (SG) and 240 non-SG (NSG). Demographic and clinical features were acquired, and comparison was based drawn on gender, age, Ct range, and clinical type (mild/mild-moderate/severe COVID-19). COVID-19 was confirmed by real time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction test based on Ct value below 35. Results: Initial evaluation revealed no significant association between Ct range and clinical type either within or between SG and NSG. Follow-up at 7/14 days revealed no significant difference between the groups for Ct range/clinical type; however, within groups Ct range showed a clear change towards higher values. The recovery rate was also evaluated which displayed no difference at 7 days while at 14 days' recover rate was 47.5% for SG and 80.0% for NSG. Moreover, in both groups un-recovered patients were mostly observed either in mild-moderate and severe COVID state; however, SG showed more patients in mild-moderate group and longer discharge time. Conclusions: We found that Ct value and clinical type have no significant association in COVID-19 smokers versus nonsmokers and smokers are at high risk and take a longer time to recover from COVID.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_86_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_86_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新出现的流行病学研究表明,吸烟与2019年冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)之间存在矛盾的关联。这项回顾性研究旨在调查COVID-19阳性吸烟者和非吸烟者的周期阈值(Ct)值与临床类型之间的关系。方法:本研究于2020年10月3日至2022年10月30日进行。560名新冠肺炎患者入选,其中包括320名吸烟组(SG)和240名非吸烟组(NSG)。获取人口统计学和临床特征,并根据性别、年龄、Ct范围和临床类型(轻度/轻度-中度/重度新冠肺炎)进行比较。基于Ct值低于35,通过实时逆转录聚合酶链反应检测确诊新冠肺炎。结果:初步评估显示,无论是SG还是NSG,Ct范围与临床类型之间都没有显著关联。在7/14天的随访显示,两组之间的Ct范围/临床类型没有显著差异;然而,在组内Ct范围显示出向更高值的明显变化。还评估了恢复率,在7天时没有显示出差异,而在14天时,SG和NSG的恢复率分别为47.5%和80.0%。此外,在两组中,未康复的患者大多处于轻度、中度和重度新冠肺炎状态;轻度-中度组SG患者较多,出院时间较长。结论:我们发现,在新冠肺炎吸烟者与非吸烟者中,Ct值和临床类型没有显著关联,吸烟者处于高风险状态,需要更长的时间才能从COVID中恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cycle threshold value and coronavirus disease 2019 clinical type among smokers and nonsmokers reveal no significant association despite clinical type shows smokers are at high risk: A retrospective study
Background: Emerging epidemiological studies indicate a paradoxical association between smoking and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This retrospective study aimed to investigate the association between cycle threshold (Ct) values and clinical type among COVID-19-positive smokers and nonsmokers. Methods: The study was conducted from October 3, 2020, to October 3, 2022. Five hundred and sixty COVID-19 patients were enrolled, which included 320 smoking group (SG) and 240 non-SG (NSG). Demographic and clinical features were acquired, and comparison was based drawn on gender, age, Ct range, and clinical type (mild/mild-moderate/severe COVID-19). COVID-19 was confirmed by real time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction test based on Ct value below 35. Results: Initial evaluation revealed no significant association between Ct range and clinical type either within or between SG and NSG. Follow-up at 7/14 days revealed no significant difference between the groups for Ct range/clinical type; however, within groups Ct range showed a clear change towards higher values. The recovery rate was also evaluated which displayed no difference at 7 days while at 14 days' recover rate was 47.5% for SG and 80.0% for NSG. Moreover, in both groups un-recovered patients were mostly observed either in mild-moderate and severe COVID state; however, SG showed more patients in mild-moderate group and longer discharge time. Conclusions: We found that Ct value and clinical type have no significant association in COVID-19 smokers versus nonsmokers and smokers are at high risk and take a longer time to recover from COVID.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal
Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
42.90%
发文量
24
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigation Abutment Stress Shielding Distribution on Titanium Alloy Biomaterial under Bruxism Chewing Cycles: Three-dimensional Finite Element Chewing Simulation Information and Information Technology Needed by Adults, Families, and Managers of Elderly Centers Evaluation of Warfarin-associated Major Hemorrhage in Hospitalized Patients Correlation of Genetic Mutation in Rv0676 and Drug Susceptibility Patterns in Tuberculosis Isolates Nepeta macrosiphon Essential Oil Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Activity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1