{"title":"一项回顾性研究显示,吸烟者和非吸烟者的周期阈值和2019年冠状病毒病临床类型没有显著关联,尽管临床类型显示吸烟者处于高风险中","authors":"A. Azad, Suboor Naik, A. Malik, Varshiesh Raina","doi":"10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_86_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Emerging epidemiological studies indicate a paradoxical association between smoking and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This retrospective study aimed to investigate the association between cycle threshold (Ct) values and clinical type among COVID-19-positive smokers and nonsmokers. Methods: The study was conducted from October 3, 2020, to October 3, 2022. Five hundred and sixty COVID-19 patients were enrolled, which included 320 smoking group (SG) and 240 non-SG (NSG). Demographic and clinical features were acquired, and comparison was based drawn on gender, age, Ct range, and clinical type (mild/mild-moderate/severe COVID-19). COVID-19 was confirmed by real time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction test based on Ct value below 35. Results: Initial evaluation revealed no significant association between Ct range and clinical type either within or between SG and NSG. Follow-up at 7/14 days revealed no significant difference between the groups for Ct range/clinical type; however, within groups Ct range showed a clear change towards higher values. The recovery rate was also evaluated which displayed no difference at 7 days while at 14 days' recover rate was 47.5% for SG and 80.0% for NSG. Moreover, in both groups un-recovered patients were mostly observed either in mild-moderate and severe COVID state; however, SG showed more patients in mild-moderate group and longer discharge time. Conclusions: We found that Ct value and clinical type have no significant association in COVID-19 smokers versus nonsmokers and smokers are at high risk and take a longer time to recover from COVID.","PeriodicalId":36500,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cycle threshold value and coronavirus disease 2019 clinical type among smokers and nonsmokers reveal no significant association despite clinical type shows smokers are at high risk: A retrospective study\",\"authors\":\"A. Azad, Suboor Naik, A. Malik, Varshiesh Raina\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_86_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Emerging epidemiological studies indicate a paradoxical association between smoking and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This retrospective study aimed to investigate the association between cycle threshold (Ct) values and clinical type among COVID-19-positive smokers and nonsmokers. Methods: The study was conducted from October 3, 2020, to October 3, 2022. Five hundred and sixty COVID-19 patients were enrolled, which included 320 smoking group (SG) and 240 non-SG (NSG). Demographic and clinical features were acquired, and comparison was based drawn on gender, age, Ct range, and clinical type (mild/mild-moderate/severe COVID-19). COVID-19 was confirmed by real time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction test based on Ct value below 35. Results: Initial evaluation revealed no significant association between Ct range and clinical type either within or between SG and NSG. Follow-up at 7/14 days revealed no significant difference between the groups for Ct range/clinical type; however, within groups Ct range showed a clear change towards higher values. The recovery rate was also evaluated which displayed no difference at 7 days while at 14 days' recover rate was 47.5% for SG and 80.0% for NSG. Moreover, in both groups un-recovered patients were mostly observed either in mild-moderate and severe COVID state; however, SG showed more patients in mild-moderate group and longer discharge time. Conclusions: We found that Ct value and clinical type have no significant association in COVID-19 smokers versus nonsmokers and smokers are at high risk and take a longer time to recover from COVID.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_86_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_86_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cycle threshold value and coronavirus disease 2019 clinical type among smokers and nonsmokers reveal no significant association despite clinical type shows smokers are at high risk: A retrospective study
Background: Emerging epidemiological studies indicate a paradoxical association between smoking and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This retrospective study aimed to investigate the association between cycle threshold (Ct) values and clinical type among COVID-19-positive smokers and nonsmokers. Methods: The study was conducted from October 3, 2020, to October 3, 2022. Five hundred and sixty COVID-19 patients were enrolled, which included 320 smoking group (SG) and 240 non-SG (NSG). Demographic and clinical features were acquired, and comparison was based drawn on gender, age, Ct range, and clinical type (mild/mild-moderate/severe COVID-19). COVID-19 was confirmed by real time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction test based on Ct value below 35. Results: Initial evaluation revealed no significant association between Ct range and clinical type either within or between SG and NSG. Follow-up at 7/14 days revealed no significant difference between the groups for Ct range/clinical type; however, within groups Ct range showed a clear change towards higher values. The recovery rate was also evaluated which displayed no difference at 7 days while at 14 days' recover rate was 47.5% for SG and 80.0% for NSG. Moreover, in both groups un-recovered patients were mostly observed either in mild-moderate and severe COVID state; however, SG showed more patients in mild-moderate group and longer discharge time. Conclusions: We found that Ct value and clinical type have no significant association in COVID-19 smokers versus nonsmokers and smokers are at high risk and take a longer time to recover from COVID.