富含血小板血浆治疗顽固性足底筋膜炎的镇痛疗效和功能结果:皮质类固醇注射的随机比较研究

IF 0.6 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2023-06-17 DOI:10.1080/11101849.2023.2224651
Zeinab Hamed Sawan, Sanaa Ahmed El-Tohamy, Khadeja M. Elhossieny, Osama Hussein Abdel-Halim Basha, Amr Shaaban Hafez
{"title":"富含血小板血浆治疗顽固性足底筋膜炎的镇痛疗效和功能结果:皮质类固醇注射的随机比较研究","authors":"Zeinab Hamed Sawan, Sanaa Ahmed El-Tohamy, Khadeja M. Elhossieny, Osama Hussein Abdel-Halim Basha, Amr Shaaban Hafez","doi":"10.1080/11101849.2023.2224651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Steroid injection is a widespread treatment for plantar fasciitis but seems to be useful to a lesser extent, Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP) injections into the plantar fascia start the healing process required to stop the degeneration of the plantar fascia at its root. Aim of the study To compare analgesic efficacy, functional outcome, degree of satisfaction and improvement of fascial thickness and echogenicity after platelet-rich plasma injection versus corticosteroids injection in refractory cases of plantar fasciitis. Patients & method 60 patients with refractory plantar fasciitis who were resistant to conservative treatment were randomized to receive either PRP or steroid injection. All patients were assessed with the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for pain, the Roles-Maudsley (RM) Score and plantar fascia thickness and echogenicity. Data were collected prospectively, pre-treatment, at 3, 6, 12 week, and 6 months post-injection. Results There was significant improvement in both groups as regards the clinical outcome measures involving (VAS & AOFAS) and radiological outcome measures including (thickness and echogenicity) in all post-injection times. However, steroid group showed early improvement (at 3rd week post-injection) with short duration while PRP group showed improvement at 12 weeks post-injection till the end of the study. Conclusion The use of PRP injection is safer with better analgesia and functional outcome than steroid therapy for treating chronic plantar fasciitis.","PeriodicalId":11437,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analgesic efficacy and functional outcome in refractory cases of plantar fasciitis treated with platelet-rich plasma: randomized comparative study with corticosteroids injection\",\"authors\":\"Zeinab Hamed Sawan, Sanaa Ahmed El-Tohamy, Khadeja M. Elhossieny, Osama Hussein Abdel-Halim Basha, Amr Shaaban Hafez\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/11101849.2023.2224651\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Background Steroid injection is a widespread treatment for plantar fasciitis but seems to be useful to a lesser extent, Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP) injections into the plantar fascia start the healing process required to stop the degeneration of the plantar fascia at its root. Aim of the study To compare analgesic efficacy, functional outcome, degree of satisfaction and improvement of fascial thickness and echogenicity after platelet-rich plasma injection versus corticosteroids injection in refractory cases of plantar fasciitis. Patients & method 60 patients with refractory plantar fasciitis who were resistant to conservative treatment were randomized to receive either PRP or steroid injection. All patients were assessed with the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for pain, the Roles-Maudsley (RM) Score and plantar fascia thickness and echogenicity. Data were collected prospectively, pre-treatment, at 3, 6, 12 week, and 6 months post-injection. Results There was significant improvement in both groups as regards the clinical outcome measures involving (VAS & AOFAS) and radiological outcome measures including (thickness and echogenicity) in all post-injection times. However, steroid group showed early improvement (at 3rd week post-injection) with short duration while PRP group showed improvement at 12 weeks post-injection till the end of the study. Conclusion The use of PRP injection is safer with better analgesia and functional outcome than steroid therapy for treating chronic plantar fasciitis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/11101849.2023.2224651\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11101849.2023.2224651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analgesic efficacy and functional outcome in refractory cases of plantar fasciitis treated with platelet-rich plasma: randomized comparative study with corticosteroids injection
ABSTRACT Background Steroid injection is a widespread treatment for plantar fasciitis but seems to be useful to a lesser extent, Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP) injections into the plantar fascia start the healing process required to stop the degeneration of the plantar fascia at its root. Aim of the study To compare analgesic efficacy, functional outcome, degree of satisfaction and improvement of fascial thickness and echogenicity after platelet-rich plasma injection versus corticosteroids injection in refractory cases of plantar fasciitis. Patients & method 60 patients with refractory plantar fasciitis who were resistant to conservative treatment were randomized to receive either PRP or steroid injection. All patients were assessed with the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for pain, the Roles-Maudsley (RM) Score and plantar fascia thickness and echogenicity. Data were collected prospectively, pre-treatment, at 3, 6, 12 week, and 6 months post-injection. Results There was significant improvement in both groups as regards the clinical outcome measures involving (VAS & AOFAS) and radiological outcome measures including (thickness and echogenicity) in all post-injection times. However, steroid group showed early improvement (at 3rd week post-injection) with short duration while PRP group showed improvement at 12 weeks post-injection till the end of the study. Conclusion The use of PRP injection is safer with better analgesia and functional outcome than steroid therapy for treating chronic plantar fasciitis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
期刊最新文献
Intrathecal levo-bupivacaine versus hyperbaric bupivacaine for inguinal hernia repairs in ex-preterm infants: A double blinded randomized prospective study Comparison of two different methods as reliable predictors of successful caudal block in children Effect of sevoflurane versus propofol on early cognitive functions in elderly patients after lumbar disc surgery Muscle wasting assessed by ultrasound versus scoring systems as early predictor of outcomes of intensive care unit stay in critically ill patients Posterior quadratus lumborum versus caudal epidural block for perioperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing upper abdominal surgeries: Arandomized, double-blind trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1