给予和取得目的地品牌所有权:利益相关者参与机制

IF 1.8 Q3 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Journal of Place Management and Development Pub Date : 2022-06-06 DOI:10.1108/jpmd-12-2020-0124
Alberte Tøttenborg, Can-Seng Ooi, A. Hardy
{"title":"给予和取得目的地品牌所有权:利益相关者参与机制","authors":"Alberte Tøttenborg, Can-Seng Ooi, A. Hardy","doi":"10.1108/jpmd-12-2020-0124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to explore the complexities of engaging with local stakeholders in destination branding. As the main creators and drivers of the destination brand, many brand authorities metaphorically “give ownership” of the brand to local stakeholders, for them to “take ownership” of it. This paper examines the inherent challenges of this process. In the Tasmanian destination branding process presented here, the Tasmanian authorities used best practices to generate a sense of ownership of the destination brand among local tourism businesses. Some players engaged, but many did not. The study shows the necessity to understand the dynamics between giving ownership of the brand and the various local tourism business stakeholders actually taking ownership.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study looks at an Australian destination branding experience, namely, Tasmania’s “Go Behind the Scenery”. Primary data were gathered through 14 in-depth interviews with tourism operators, selected through a purposive sampling approach, based on their various levels of participation in the branding processes. The interviews aimed to understand how they variously engaged with the brand and processes of ownership.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study shows that a relatively open interpretation of the brand can welcome wider engagement and generate a sense of ownership through the local businesses’ own interpretations. But there are also barriers for these stakeholders in developing an even stronger sense of ownership. They need more support in addressing their individual circumstance before the brand can align with their business.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper accentuates an ownership gap, understood as the gap between giving ownership (mechanisms to transfer ownership from brand authorities to stakeholders) and taking ownership (stakeholders assume responsibility for and manifest the brand). In identifying a gap between these two aspects of engagement, this paper initiates a more nuanced discussion on the mechanisms of stakeholder engagement in the branding process.\n","PeriodicalId":46966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Place Management and Development","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Giving and taking ownership of a destination brand: mechanisms of stakeholder engagement\",\"authors\":\"Alberte Tøttenborg, Can-Seng Ooi, A. Hardy\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jpmd-12-2020-0124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis paper aims to explore the complexities of engaging with local stakeholders in destination branding. As the main creators and drivers of the destination brand, many brand authorities metaphorically “give ownership” of the brand to local stakeholders, for them to “take ownership” of it. This paper examines the inherent challenges of this process. In the Tasmanian destination branding process presented here, the Tasmanian authorities used best practices to generate a sense of ownership of the destination brand among local tourism businesses. Some players engaged, but many did not. The study shows the necessity to understand the dynamics between giving ownership of the brand and the various local tourism business stakeholders actually taking ownership.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis study looks at an Australian destination branding experience, namely, Tasmania’s “Go Behind the Scenery”. Primary data were gathered through 14 in-depth interviews with tourism operators, selected through a purposive sampling approach, based on their various levels of participation in the branding processes. The interviews aimed to understand how they variously engaged with the brand and processes of ownership.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThis study shows that a relatively open interpretation of the brand can welcome wider engagement and generate a sense of ownership through the local businesses’ own interpretations. But there are also barriers for these stakeholders in developing an even stronger sense of ownership. They need more support in addressing their individual circumstance before the brand can align with their business.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis paper accentuates an ownership gap, understood as the gap between giving ownership (mechanisms to transfer ownership from brand authorities to stakeholders) and taking ownership (stakeholders assume responsibility for and manifest the brand). In identifying a gap between these two aspects of engagement, this paper initiates a more nuanced discussion on the mechanisms of stakeholder engagement in the branding process.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":46966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Place Management and Development\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Place Management and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpmd-12-2020-0124\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Place Management and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpmd-12-2020-0124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的本文旨在探讨与当地利益相关者合作打造目的地品牌的复杂性。作为目的地品牌的主要创造者和推动者,许多品牌权威机构将品牌的所有权“交给”当地利益相关者,让他们“拥有”品牌。在这里介绍的塔斯马尼亚目的地品牌过程中,塔斯马尼亚当局使用最佳实践在当地旅游企业中产生目的地品牌的所有权感。一些玩家参与了,但许多玩家没有。该研究表明,有必要了解赋予品牌所有权和实际拥有所有权的各种当地旅游企业利益相关者之间的动态关系。设计/方法论/方法本研究着眼于澳大利亚目的地品牌体验,即塔斯马尼亚的“走进风景背后”。主要数据是通过对旅游运营商的14次深入采访收集的,这些采访是根据他们在品牌过程中的不同参与程度通过有目的的抽样方法选择的。采访旨在了解他们是如何以不同的方式参与品牌和所有权过程的。发现这项研究表明,对品牌的相对开放的解释可以欢迎更广泛的参与,并通过当地企业自己的解释产生主人翁感。但这些利益相关者在培养更强的主人翁意识方面也存在障碍。在品牌与他们的业务保持一致之前,他们需要更多的支持来解决他们的个人情况。独创性/价值本文强调了所有权差距,即赋予所有权(将所有权从品牌主管部门转移给利益相关者的机制)和获得所有权(利益相关者承担品牌责任并体现品牌)之间的差距。在确定参与的这两个方面之间的差距时,本文对品牌过程中利益相关者参与的机制进行了更细致的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Giving and taking ownership of a destination brand: mechanisms of stakeholder engagement
Purpose This paper aims to explore the complexities of engaging with local stakeholders in destination branding. As the main creators and drivers of the destination brand, many brand authorities metaphorically “give ownership” of the brand to local stakeholders, for them to “take ownership” of it. This paper examines the inherent challenges of this process. In the Tasmanian destination branding process presented here, the Tasmanian authorities used best practices to generate a sense of ownership of the destination brand among local tourism businesses. Some players engaged, but many did not. The study shows the necessity to understand the dynamics between giving ownership of the brand and the various local tourism business stakeholders actually taking ownership. Design/methodology/approach This study looks at an Australian destination branding experience, namely, Tasmania’s “Go Behind the Scenery”. Primary data were gathered through 14 in-depth interviews with tourism operators, selected through a purposive sampling approach, based on their various levels of participation in the branding processes. The interviews aimed to understand how they variously engaged with the brand and processes of ownership. Findings This study shows that a relatively open interpretation of the brand can welcome wider engagement and generate a sense of ownership through the local businesses’ own interpretations. But there are also barriers for these stakeholders in developing an even stronger sense of ownership. They need more support in addressing their individual circumstance before the brand can align with their business. Originality/value This paper accentuates an ownership gap, understood as the gap between giving ownership (mechanisms to transfer ownership from brand authorities to stakeholders) and taking ownership (stakeholders assume responsibility for and manifest the brand). In identifying a gap between these two aspects of engagement, this paper initiates a more nuanced discussion on the mechanisms of stakeholder engagement in the branding process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Place Management and Development
Journal of Place Management and Development HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Exploring the drivers of residents’ identification and green citizenship behavior in green cities: a multicountry study Street art and place-making of villages: examples of Italian painted villages Conceptualising place branding in three approaches: towards a new definition of place brands as embodied experiences Leveraging consumer chronic time pressure and time management to improve retail venue outcomes Economic outcomes of place branding: evidence from a scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1