一级创伤中心患者体验与临床结果之间的关系:一项基于横断面调查的研究

Andrew Oberle, Dajun Tian, K. Hayes, Steven W. Howard, V. Moran
{"title":"一级创伤中心患者体验与临床结果之间的关系:一项基于横断面调查的研究","authors":"Andrew Oberle, Dajun Tian, K. Hayes, Steven W. Howard, V. Moran","doi":"10.21037/jhmhp-21-65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Helping survivors of traumatic injuries achieve optimal recovery is a crucial global health issue. Traumatic injuries present major implications for the health of patients, care systems, and world economies. Focusing on the improvement of structures and processes that influence hospitalized trauma patient experience is a potentially important way to improve outcomes and health-related finances. The purpose of this study is to determine if there are associations between patient experience and clinical outcomes for hospitalized trauma patients. Methods: The study used a cross-sectional design. Primary data was collected in March and April 2020. Potential participants were 95 trauma patients who received care for traumatic injuries at a United States urban Level I trauma center from November 2018 to January 2020 and consented to be contacted for future research. Phone surveys were used to collect quantitative and qualitative data on participants’ patient experiences and health outcomes related to their hospitalization. Additional health outcomes were collected from participants’ electronic health records. General linear and Poisson regressions were used to analyze associations between experience and outcomes. Differences between injury severity groups were analyzed using chi-square and t-tests. Results: Thirty participants completed the phone survey, a response rate of 31.6%. Positive nurse communication was associated with a significantly lower risk of hospital-acquired complications compared to negative nurse communication (−33%; 95% CI, −61% to −5.5%). Patients with severe injuries had a lower risk of 30-day readmissions when reporting positive nurse communication (−56% decrease; 95% CI, −88% to −23%), positive doctor communication (−50%; 95% CI, −81% to −19%), and positive overall hospital rating (−56%; 95% CI, −99% to −13%) when compared to severely injured patients who reported negative nurse and doctor communication and overall rating. Conclusions: This study shows that aspects of patient experience, especially those related to communication with providers, are significantly associated with clinical outcomes for acute trauma patients, with potential implications for Continuous Quality Improvement and value-based reimbursement. Additional research would confirm if these associations exist for larger samples and patients treated for traumatic injuries in non-urban settings.","PeriodicalId":92075,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital management and health policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations between patient experience and clinical outcomes at a level I trauma center: a cross-sectional survey-based study\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Oberle, Dajun Tian, K. Hayes, Steven W. Howard, V. Moran\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/jhmhp-21-65\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Helping survivors of traumatic injuries achieve optimal recovery is a crucial global health issue. Traumatic injuries present major implications for the health of patients, care systems, and world economies. Focusing on the improvement of structures and processes that influence hospitalized trauma patient experience is a potentially important way to improve outcomes and health-related finances. The purpose of this study is to determine if there are associations between patient experience and clinical outcomes for hospitalized trauma patients. Methods: The study used a cross-sectional design. Primary data was collected in March and April 2020. Potential participants were 95 trauma patients who received care for traumatic injuries at a United States urban Level I trauma center from November 2018 to January 2020 and consented to be contacted for future research. Phone surveys were used to collect quantitative and qualitative data on participants’ patient experiences and health outcomes related to their hospitalization. Additional health outcomes were collected from participants’ electronic health records. General linear and Poisson regressions were used to analyze associations between experience and outcomes. Differences between injury severity groups were analyzed using chi-square and t-tests. Results: Thirty participants completed the phone survey, a response rate of 31.6%. Positive nurse communication was associated with a significantly lower risk of hospital-acquired complications compared to negative nurse communication (−33%; 95% CI, −61% to −5.5%). Patients with severe injuries had a lower risk of 30-day readmissions when reporting positive nurse communication (−56% decrease; 95% CI, −88% to −23%), positive doctor communication (−50%; 95% CI, −81% to −19%), and positive overall hospital rating (−56%; 95% CI, −99% to −13%) when compared to severely injured patients who reported negative nurse and doctor communication and overall rating. Conclusions: This study shows that aspects of patient experience, especially those related to communication with providers, are significantly associated with clinical outcomes for acute trauma patients, with potential implications for Continuous Quality Improvement and value-based reimbursement. Additional research would confirm if these associations exist for larger samples and patients treated for traumatic injuries in non-urban settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of hospital management and health policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of hospital management and health policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/jhmhp-21-65\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital management and health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jhmhp-21-65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:帮助创伤幸存者实现最佳康复是一个至关重要的全球健康问题。创伤对患者的健康、护理系统和世界经济都有重大影响。专注于改善影响住院创伤患者体验的结构和流程,是改善结果和健康相关财务状况的潜在重要途径。本研究的目的是确定住院创伤患者的患者经历和临床结果之间是否存在关联。方法:本研究采用横断面设计。主要数据收集于2020年3月和4月。潜在参与者是95名创伤患者,他们于2018年11月至2020年1月在美国城市一级创伤中心接受了创伤护理,并同意联系他们进行未来的研究。电话调查用于收集参与者与住院相关的患者经历和健康结果的定量和定性数据。从参与者的电子健康记录中收集了其他健康结果。一般线性回归和泊松回归用于分析经验和结果之间的关联。使用卡方检验和t检验分析损伤严重程度组之间的差异。结果:30名参与者完成了电话调查,有效率为31.6%。与消极的护士沟通相比,积极的护士沟通与医院获得性并发症的风险显著降低有关(-33%;95%CI,-61%至-5.5%)。严重受伤患者在报告积极的护士交流时,30天再次入院的风险较低(-56%下降;95%CI为-88%至-23%),与报告护士和医生沟通和总体评分为阴性的严重受伤患者相比,积极的医生沟通(−50%;95%置信区间,−81%至−19%)和积极的总体医院评分(−56%;95%可信区间,−99%至−13%)。结论:这项研究表明,患者体验的各个方面,特别是与提供者沟通相关的方面,与急性创伤患者的临床结果显著相关,对持续质量改进和基于价值的报销有潜在影响。更多的研究将证实,在非城市环境中接受创伤治疗的较大样本和患者是否存在这些关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Associations between patient experience and clinical outcomes at a level I trauma center: a cross-sectional survey-based study
Background: Helping survivors of traumatic injuries achieve optimal recovery is a crucial global health issue. Traumatic injuries present major implications for the health of patients, care systems, and world economies. Focusing on the improvement of structures and processes that influence hospitalized trauma patient experience is a potentially important way to improve outcomes and health-related finances. The purpose of this study is to determine if there are associations between patient experience and clinical outcomes for hospitalized trauma patients. Methods: The study used a cross-sectional design. Primary data was collected in March and April 2020. Potential participants were 95 trauma patients who received care for traumatic injuries at a United States urban Level I trauma center from November 2018 to January 2020 and consented to be contacted for future research. Phone surveys were used to collect quantitative and qualitative data on participants’ patient experiences and health outcomes related to their hospitalization. Additional health outcomes were collected from participants’ electronic health records. General linear and Poisson regressions were used to analyze associations between experience and outcomes. Differences between injury severity groups were analyzed using chi-square and t-tests. Results: Thirty participants completed the phone survey, a response rate of 31.6%. Positive nurse communication was associated with a significantly lower risk of hospital-acquired complications compared to negative nurse communication (−33%; 95% CI, −61% to −5.5%). Patients with severe injuries had a lower risk of 30-day readmissions when reporting positive nurse communication (−56% decrease; 95% CI, −88% to −23%), positive doctor communication (−50%; 95% CI, −81% to −19%), and positive overall hospital rating (−56%; 95% CI, −99% to −13%) when compared to severely injured patients who reported negative nurse and doctor communication and overall rating. Conclusions: This study shows that aspects of patient experience, especially those related to communication with providers, are significantly associated with clinical outcomes for acute trauma patients, with potential implications for Continuous Quality Improvement and value-based reimbursement. Additional research would confirm if these associations exist for larger samples and patients treated for traumatic injuries in non-urban settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recent trends in hospital market concentration and profitability: the case of New Jersey COVID-19 outbreak and integration of social media in public health crisis communication: a case study of UMMC, Kuala Lumpur Spatial disparities in flood vulnerability in New York City Spatial and visual comparison analysis of health disparities in London neighbourhoods: the case of Southwark and Lambeth Impact of COVID-19 on operation room utilization efficiency and cardiac surgery care pathway: single centre experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1