我们现在如何生活:与矩阵女权主义设计合作重新想象空间

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 Q4 AREA STUDIES London Journal Pub Date : 2021-11-16 DOI:10.1080/03058034.2021.1992828
Christine Hannigan
{"title":"我们现在如何生活:与矩阵女权主义设计合作重新想象空间","authors":"Christine Hannigan","doi":"10.1080/03058034.2021.1992828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"‘How We Live Now: Reimagining Spaces with Matrix Feminist Design Co-operative’ is the latest exhibition of the Barbican’s Level G Programme, ‘an experimental platform for projects that ask crucial social and cultural questions’. The question asked here is who creates the built environment, and for whom; the answer is provided through a focus on the work of Matrix, a pioneering architectural co-operative founded in 1981. In their 13 years of operation, the group worked solely on state-funded, social building projects, typically with women and children’s groups as clientele. Feminist design collective Edit created the physical structures of the exhibit to reflect Matrix’s concern with the informal use of space. Architectural drawings and photographs chronicling Matrix’s work are fastened to plywood frames, alluding to a construction site. Curtains made by Cawley Studio hang from a metal rail snaking through the exhibit to subdivide the space (Figure 1). Parting them to enter, the viewer is transported back to 1980s England. Panels display adverts for cars and household consumables with copy and images demeaning women, bizarrely irrelevant to the product advertised. Heather Powell’s film Paradise Circus (1988) plays on a large television, cataloguing the hostility of Birmingham’s built environment: its thoughtlessly designed housing, unsafe and creepy tunnel network, and labyrinthine road layout that prioritised motorists and polluted the air. The film examines the government’s decades of post-war slum clearances and replacement Garden City neighbourhoods. These suburban prototypes were planned and designed by men who failed to properly consider the needs of anyone unlike them. The house was not viewed as a place of work, and accommodation for people moving through the city with disabilities, or children, or without cars, was nearly non-existent. This scene-setting brings Matrix’s radical approach, and the wave of feminism of which it was a part, into full relief. Juxtaposed to these lazy, sexist banalities is Matrix’s manifesto, a single sheet of unadorned paper which sets out:","PeriodicalId":43904,"journal":{"name":"London Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How We Live Now: Reimagining Spaces with Matrix Feminist Design Co-operative\",\"authors\":\"Christine Hannigan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03058034.2021.1992828\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"‘How We Live Now: Reimagining Spaces with Matrix Feminist Design Co-operative’ is the latest exhibition of the Barbican’s Level G Programme, ‘an experimental platform for projects that ask crucial social and cultural questions’. The question asked here is who creates the built environment, and for whom; the answer is provided through a focus on the work of Matrix, a pioneering architectural co-operative founded in 1981. In their 13 years of operation, the group worked solely on state-funded, social building projects, typically with women and children’s groups as clientele. Feminist design collective Edit created the physical structures of the exhibit to reflect Matrix’s concern with the informal use of space. Architectural drawings and photographs chronicling Matrix’s work are fastened to plywood frames, alluding to a construction site. Curtains made by Cawley Studio hang from a metal rail snaking through the exhibit to subdivide the space (Figure 1). Parting them to enter, the viewer is transported back to 1980s England. Panels display adverts for cars and household consumables with copy and images demeaning women, bizarrely irrelevant to the product advertised. Heather Powell’s film Paradise Circus (1988) plays on a large television, cataloguing the hostility of Birmingham’s built environment: its thoughtlessly designed housing, unsafe and creepy tunnel network, and labyrinthine road layout that prioritised motorists and polluted the air. The film examines the government’s decades of post-war slum clearances and replacement Garden City neighbourhoods. These suburban prototypes were planned and designed by men who failed to properly consider the needs of anyone unlike them. The house was not viewed as a place of work, and accommodation for people moving through the city with disabilities, or children, or without cars, was nearly non-existent. This scene-setting brings Matrix’s radical approach, and the wave of feminism of which it was a part, into full relief. Juxtaposed to these lazy, sexist banalities is Matrix’s manifesto, a single sheet of unadorned paper which sets out:\",\"PeriodicalId\":43904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"London Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"London Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03058034.2021.1992828\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"London Journal","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03058034.2021.1992828","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“我们现在的生活方式:与矩阵女权主义设计合作重塑空间”是巴比肯G级计划的最新展览,“这是一个提出关键社会和文化问题的项目的实验平台”。这里提出的问题是谁创造了建筑环境,为谁创造;答案是通过对Matrix的工作的关注来提供的,Matrix是一家成立于1981年的开创性建筑合作社。在他们13年的运营中,该组织只从事国家资助的社会建设项目,通常以妇女和儿童团体为客户。女性主义设计团体Edit创造了展览的物理结构,以反映Matrix对空间非正式使用的关注。记录Matrix作品的建筑图纸和照片被固定在胶合板框架上,暗指一个建筑工地。考利工作室制作的窗帘悬挂在金属栏杆上,金属栏杆蜿蜒穿过展览,以细分空间(图1)。离开他们进入,观众被带回了20世纪80年代的英国。面板上展示了汽车和家用耗材的广告,其中有贬低女性的文案和图片,与广告中的产品毫无关系。希瑟·鲍威尔(Heather Powell)的电影《天堂马戏团》(Paradise Circus)(1988年)在一台大型电视上播放,记录了伯明翰建筑环境的敌意:其轻率设计的住房、不安全和令人毛骨悚然的隧道网,以及以驾车者为优先考虑并污染空气的迷宫式道路布局。这部电影探讨了政府几十年来对战后贫民窟的清理和花园城街区的替代。这些郊区原型是由那些没有适当考虑到与他们不同的人的需求的人策划和设计的。这所房子不被视为工作场所,在城市中流动的残疾人、儿童或无车人员几乎没有住处。这一场景背景使《黑客帝国》的激进方法以及它所属的女权主义浪潮得到了充分的缓解。与这些懒惰、性别歧视的陈词滥调并列的是Matrix的宣言,这是一张朴实无华的纸,上面写着:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How We Live Now: Reimagining Spaces with Matrix Feminist Design Co-operative
‘How We Live Now: Reimagining Spaces with Matrix Feminist Design Co-operative’ is the latest exhibition of the Barbican’s Level G Programme, ‘an experimental platform for projects that ask crucial social and cultural questions’. The question asked here is who creates the built environment, and for whom; the answer is provided through a focus on the work of Matrix, a pioneering architectural co-operative founded in 1981. In their 13 years of operation, the group worked solely on state-funded, social building projects, typically with women and children’s groups as clientele. Feminist design collective Edit created the physical structures of the exhibit to reflect Matrix’s concern with the informal use of space. Architectural drawings and photographs chronicling Matrix’s work are fastened to plywood frames, alluding to a construction site. Curtains made by Cawley Studio hang from a metal rail snaking through the exhibit to subdivide the space (Figure 1). Parting them to enter, the viewer is transported back to 1980s England. Panels display adverts for cars and household consumables with copy and images demeaning women, bizarrely irrelevant to the product advertised. Heather Powell’s film Paradise Circus (1988) plays on a large television, cataloguing the hostility of Birmingham’s built environment: its thoughtlessly designed housing, unsafe and creepy tunnel network, and labyrinthine road layout that prioritised motorists and polluted the air. The film examines the government’s decades of post-war slum clearances and replacement Garden City neighbourhoods. These suburban prototypes were planned and designed by men who failed to properly consider the needs of anyone unlike them. The house was not viewed as a place of work, and accommodation for people moving through the city with disabilities, or children, or without cars, was nearly non-existent. This scene-setting brings Matrix’s radical approach, and the wave of feminism of which it was a part, into full relief. Juxtaposed to these lazy, sexist banalities is Matrix’s manifesto, a single sheet of unadorned paper which sets out:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
London Journal
London Journal Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The scope of The London Journal is broad, embracing all aspects of metropolitan society past and present, including comparative studies. The Journal is multi-disciplinary and is intended to interest all concerned with the understanding and enrichment of London and Londoners: historians, geographers, economists, sociologists, social workers, political scientists, planners, educationalist, archaeologists, conservationists, architects, and all those taking an interest in the fine and performing arts, the natural environment and in commentaries on metropolitan life in fiction as in fact
期刊最新文献
Designs on Democracy: Architecture and the Public in Interwar London Designs on Democracy: Architecture and the Public in Interwar London . By N eal S hasore . Pp. xxvii + 432 + 142 illustrations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. £71.00. ISBN 978-0-19-284972-4. Hardback. Vagabonds: Life on the Streets of Nineteenth-Century London Vagabonds: Life on the Streets of Nineteenth-Century London . By O skar J ensen . Pp. 352. London: Duckworth Books, 2022. £20.00. ISBN 978071564392. Hardback. A Network of Contacts: Metropolitan Influences in the Delivery of Poor Relief in the London Hinterland (1778–1785) London Marine Insurance, 1438–1824: Risk, Trade, and the Early Modern State Nicholas Barbon: Developing London, 1667–1698
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1